Sensorimotor Training in Low-back Pain Rehabilitation (SeMoPoP)

April 5, 2016 updated by: Michael A. McCaskey

Effects of a Sensorimotor Training on Postural Control and Pain: A Parallel, Single-blinded Randomised Controlled Trial

This study evaluates the effects of additional sensorimotor training (proprioceptive postural training, PPT) to conventional therapy in the treatment of chronic low-back pain. Half of the participants will receive instructed treadmill training as an active comparator against PPT. All participants receive conventional physiotherapy as prescribed by their treating medical doctors. It is expected that the PPT group will improve in postural control, proprioceptive, as well as pain and function outcomes to a significantly greater extent than the active control group.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Aargau
      • Rheinfelden, Aargau, Switzerland, 4310
        • Reha Rheinfelden

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with musculoskeletal low back pain (non-specific low back pain)
  • Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected neurological diseases or lesions
  • Traumatic injury of musculoskeletal system (fractures, tumours)
  • Spinal pathologies (e.g., tumour, infection, fracture, and inflammatory disease)
  • Previous spinal surgery
  • Presence of any contraindication to exercise (fracture or cardiovascular limitations)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sensorimotor
The experimental group will receive added PPT to the conventional physiotherapy. PPT will be applied by means of a neuro-orthopaedic medical device ("Posturomed®", see section 3.2). The "Posturomed" allows adaptive oscillation in the horizontal plane. Therapy instructions advise seven stages of difficulty. In all stages the patient is asked to provoke oscillation by stepping on site. After three steps, the patient must stand still on one leg for 2 seconds before he or she repeats the steps. Difficulty is increased by a) decreasing the damping through release of the breaks and b) through added juggling of a ball during the motor task (dual-task and divided attention). The next stage is reached once stabilisation in the previous stage is secured.
Other Names:
  • Sensorimotor training
All participating patients will attend usual care according to their treatment plan (taking part in the study does not affect the treatment plan). A physiotherapy referral requests 9 treatments, each of which takes 30 minutes. These will take place twice a week for 4.5 weeks. The study protocol does not dictate the content of the physiotherapy sessions themselves, but detailed documentation of provided treatments is required (therapy documentation sheet). Additionally, the aim of the physiotherapy sessions should always include reduction of muscular imbalances and optimisation of posture.
Active Comparator: Low-intensity activity
Added to conventional therapy, as administered to all participants, the control group will do added treadmill walking. The control intervention will consist of 10 minutes of walking at comfortable pace. The patient will be instructed in treadmill functions and asked to set the speed between 2 and 4 km/h. The speed should be adjusted to the level where the patient would still be able to talk comfortably.
All participating patients will attend usual care according to their treatment plan (taking part in the study does not affect the treatment plan). A physiotherapy referral requests 9 treatments, each of which takes 30 minutes. These will take place twice a week for 4.5 weeks. The study protocol does not dictate the content of the physiotherapy sessions themselves, but detailed documentation of provided treatments is required (therapy documentation sheet). Additionally, the aim of the physiotherapy sessions should always include reduction of muscular imbalances and optimisation of posture.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change of self-reported pain on 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Change of functional status recorded with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Centre of Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Area of surface a the 95% confidence ellipse of centre of pressure displacement during postural task
Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Joint Repositioning Error (segmental)
Time Frame: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Repositioning acuity after surface perturbation.
Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Uncontrolled Manifold Index (UCM)
Time Frame: Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)
Segmental joint configuration.
Baseline (-4 days); Pre-Test (0 days); Post-Test (+25 days) and follow-up (+45 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael A McCaskey, MSc, Reha Rheinfelden
  • Study Chair: Eling D. de Bruin, PD PhD, ETH Zurich
  • Study Chair: Corina Schuster-Amft, PT PhD, Reha Rheinfelden

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 1, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 6, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014-0873

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Proprioceptive postural training

3
Subscribe