To Study GSP 301 in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

September 28, 2020 updated by: Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. India

A Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel-group, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Two Different Strengths and Regimens of a Fixed Dose Combination GSP 301 Nasal Spray Compared With Placebo Nasal Spray and Individual Monotherapy Formulations (Comparators), in Subjects (12 Years of Age and Older) With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR)

Study to evaluate the two different strengths and dose regimen of GSP 301 to be effective in treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1111

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States
        • Glenmark Investigational Site 10
      • Austin, Texas, United States
        • Glenmark Investigational Site 5
      • Austin, Texas, United States
        • Glenmark Investigational Site 6
      • Kerrville, Texas, United States
        • Glenmark Investigational Site 2
      • New Braunfels, Texas, United States
        • Glenmark Investigational Site 7
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
        • Glenmark Investigational Site 3
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
        • Glenmark Investigational Site 4
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
        • Glenmark Investigational Site 8
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
        • Glenmark Investigational Site 9
      • Waco, Texas, United States
        • Glenmark Investigational Site 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged ≥12 years and older inclusive of either sex.
  2. Documented clinical history of SAR (for at least 2 years preceding the Screening Visit [Visit 1]) with exacerbations (clinical evidence of active symptoms) during the study season for the mountain cedar pollen
  3. A 12-hour reflective TNSS ≥ 8 out of a possible 12 and a congestion score of ≥ 2 for the AM assessment at the Screening Visit (Visit 1).

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or lactating women.
  2. Plans to travel outside the known pollen area for the investigative site for > 24 hours during the last 7 days of run in period.
  3. History of nasal polyps of other clinically significant respiratory tract malformations, recent nasal biopsy, nasal trauma (such as nasal piercing) or surgery, atopic dermatitis or rhinitis medicamentosa.
  4. History of anaphylaxis and/or other severe local reaction(s) to skin testing.
  5. History of positive test for HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C infection.
  6. Documented evidence of acute or significant chronic sinusitis or chronic purulent postnasal drip.
  7. Subjects with an active pulmonary disorder or infection.
  8. Subjects with posterior subcapsular cataracts or glaucoma.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: GSP 301 Placebo NS
GSP 301 placebo NS administered as 2 sprays/nostril
Experimental: GSP 301-1 NS (QD)
GSP 301-1 NS (665 μg olopatadine hydrochloride/50 μg mometasone furoate) administered as 2 sprays/nostril
Experimental: GSP 301-2 NS (BID)
GSP 301-2 NS (665 μg olopatadine hydrochloride/25 μg mometasone furoate) administered as 2 sprays/nostril
Active Comparator: Olopatadine HCl-1 NS (QD)
Olopatadine HCl-1 NS (665 μg) administered as 2 sprays/nostril
Active Comparator: Olopatadine HCl-2 NS (BID)
Olopatadine HCl-2 NS (665 μg) administered as 2 sprays/nostril
Active Comparator: Mometasone Furoate-1 NS (QD)
Mometasone furoate -1 NS (50 μg) administered as 2 sprays/nostril
Active Comparator: Mometasone Furoate-2 NS (BID)
Mometasone furoate-2 NS (25 μg) administered as 2 sprays/nostril

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in rTNSS From Baseline to End of Treatment
Time Frame: 14 days

Subjects were asked to assess rTNSS (reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score), ie, an evaluation of symptom severity over the past 12 hours prior to the recording of the score. The TNSS was defined as the sum of the subject-reported symptom severity scores for the following four nasal symptoms, recorded by each subject in the diary: rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, nasal itching.

The total rTNSS scores for all four symptoms (i.e, the lowest possible score (0) and the highest possible score (12).) Higher score means a worse outcome.

The severity scale for each symptom evaluation was defined as follows:

  • 0 = absent (no sign/symptom evident)
  • 1 = mild (sign/symptom clearly present, but minimal awareness; easily tolerated)
  • 2 = moderate (definite awareness of sign/symptom that is bothersome but tolerable)
  • 3 = severe (sign/symptom that is hard to tolerate [i.e., causes interference with activities of daily living and/or sleeping])
14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sudeesh Tantry, Ph.D, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 17, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Clinical Trials on GSP 301 Placebo NS

3
Subscribe