Efficacy and Safety of Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) of Olopatadine Hydrochloride and Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray (Molo; Also Referred as GSP 301) in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) (GSP 301- PoC)

June 18, 2018 updated by: Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. India

A Single-Center, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Comparative Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Two Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Products of Olopatadine Hydrochloride and Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray as Compared to the FDC of Azelastine Hydrochloride and Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, Olopatadine Nasal Spray, and Placebo in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis.

A single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of FDC olopatadine hydrochloride and mometasone furoate nasal spray (Molo; also referred as GSP 301) was conducted in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis. In this study, the efficacy and safety of two regimens (BID and QD) of the FDC (i.e. Molo 1 and Molo 2) were evaluated compared to placebo nasal spray, DYMISTA® and PATANASE®.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

180

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L4W 1V7
        • Glenmark Investigational Site 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female patients aged 18 to 65 years (inclusive) with a clinical history of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) (for at least 2 years) and exhibiting a positive skin prick test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to any of the components of the formulation
  • Patients with a history of seasonal asthma during ragweed season.
  • Patient requiring chronic use of inhaled or systemic corticosteroids
  • Patients with perennial rhinitis; non-allergic rhinitis; or ocular infection within 3 weeks before the screening
  • Patients with history of acute or significant chronic sinusitis or chronic purulent post-nasal drip or Rhinitis Medicamentosa as determined by the Investigator.
  • Patients with history of narrow-angle glaucoma, increased intraocular pressure, posterior subcapsular cataract, urinary retention, uncontrolled hypertension, severe Coronary Artery Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease, uncontrolled Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperthyroidism, Renal Impairment or Prostatic Hypertrophy, and those receiving MAO inhibitor therapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo nasal spray
Placebo nasal spray - 2 sprays per nostril, BID
Experimental: Molo 1 (also referred as GSP 301-2 NS)
Fixed Dose Combination of Molo nasal spray (olopatadine hydrochloride 665 mcg and mometasone furoate 25 mcg nasal spray) - 2 sprays per nostril, BID
Experimental: Molo 2 (also referred as GSP 301-1 NS)
Fixed Dose Combination of Molo nasal spray (olopatadine hydrochloride 665 mcg and mometasone furoate 50 mcg nasal spray) - 2 sprays per nostril, QD
Active Comparator: DYMISTA nasal spray
Fixed Dose Combination of azelastine hydrochloride 137 mcg and fluticasone propionate 50 mcg nasal spray - 1 spray per nostril, BID
Active Comparator: PATANASE nasal spray
Olopatadine hydrochloride 665 mcg nasal spray - 2 sprays per nostril, BID

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in mean post-treatment instantaneous Total Nasal Symptoms Score (iTNSS) for Molo 1 and Molo 2 compared with placebo from baseline to end of treatment
Time Frame: 15 days
Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) is calculated as the sum of instantaneous scoring of the severity of four individual nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing). Subject responds on a 4-point severity scale with scores ranging from 0 (no signs/absent) to 3 (severe signs).
15 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in mean post-treatment iTNSS for Molo 1 and Molo 2 compared with reference products Dymista and Patanase
Time Frame: 15 days
Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) is calculated as the sum of instantaneous scoring of the severity of four individual nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing). Subject responds on a 4-point severity scale with scores ranging from 0 (no signs/absent) to 3 (severe signs).
15 days
Change in mean post-treatment iTNSS for reference products Dymista and Patanase compared with placebo
Time Frame: 15 days
Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) is calculated as the sum of instantaneous scoring of the severity of four individual nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing). Subject responds on a 4-point severity scale with scores ranging from 0 (no signs/absent) to 3 (severe signs).
15 days
Onset of action assessed by comparing change in iTNSS after the first dose
Time Frame: 15 days
15 days
Change from baseline in post-treatment instantaneous Total Symptoms Score (iTSS) (Molo 1 and Molo 2 versus Active Comparator)
Time Frame: 15 days
Instantaneous Total Symptom Score (iTSS) is calculated as the sum of the four individual nasal symptom (nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing) scores and the three individual ocular symptom (ocular itching, tearing/watering eyes, and ocular redness) scores. Subject responds on a 4-point severity scale with scores ranging from 0 (no signs/absent) to 3 (severe signs).
15 days
Change from baseline in individual instantaneous Nasal Symptoms Scores (iNSS) (Molo 1 and Molo 2 versus Active Comparator)
Time Frame: 15 days
Individual Instantaneous Nasal Symptoms Scores (iNSS) is calculated as the score of individual nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing). Subject responds on a 4-point severity scale with scores ranging from 0 (no signs/absent) to 3 (severe signs).
15 days
Change from baseline in instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Score (iTOSS) (Molo 1 and Molo 2 versus Active Comparator)
Time Frame: 15 days
Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Score (iTOSS) is calculated as the sum of the three individual ocular symptoms (ocular itching, tearing/watering eyes, and ocular redness). Subject responds on a 4-point severity scale with scores ranging from 0 (no signs/absent) to 3 (severe signs).
15 days
Change in mean post-treatment Environmental Exposure Chamber - Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (EEC-QoLQ) scores
Time Frame: 15 days
The EEC-QoLQ has questions in three domains (non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems and emotional) related to how much a subject was bothered with symptoms. Subject responds on a 7-point scale with score ranging from 0 (better outcome) to 6 (worse outcome).
15 days
Responses to a reflective Global Assessment of Tolerability and Acceptance Questionnaire (GATAQ)
Time Frame: 15 days
Scale of 0 (very much acceptable) - 6 (not acceptable)
15 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sudeesh Tantry, PhD, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 27, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Clinical Trials on Placebo nasal spray

3
Subscribe