Mitroflow DL Post Approval Study- North America

February 18, 2020 updated by: LivaNova

Mitroflow Aortic Pericardial Heart Valve With Phospholipid Reduction Treatment Post Approval Study

Prospective, non-randomized, multicenter post-approval study to collect long term clinical and echographic data on Mitroflow DL patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Mitroflow DL valve when used to replace diseased or dysfunctional native or prosthetic aortic heart valves. The study will be conducted in a minimum of 15 centers in the United States. Patients will be evaluated at each of the following time intervals:preoperative, at implant, in the early postoperative period, at 1 year (between 11 and 13 months postoperatively), and annually for 8 years. The duration of the study is anticipated to be 8 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

186

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA Medical Center
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92123
        • Sharp Memorial Hospital
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32207
        • River City Clinical Research
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • UF Health - Jacksonville
      • Lakeland, Florida, United States, 33805
        • Watson Clinic Center for Research
    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20814
        • Suburban Hospital - John Hopkins Medicine
    • Michigan
      • Bay City, Michigan, United States, 48708
        • Bay Regional Medical Center
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48236
        • St. John Hospital & Medical Center
    • New Hampshire
      • Manchester, New Hampshire, United States, 03102
        • Catholic Medical Center
    • New Jersey
      • Paterson, New Jersey, United States, 07503
        • St. Joseph's Regional Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States, 19096
        • Lankenau Medical Center
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients is indicated for Mitroflow DL implantation according to the Instructions for Use (IFU).
  2. Patient or patient's legal representative is willing to sign the informed consent.
  3. Patient's preoperative evaluation indicated the need for native or prosthetic aortic valve replacement
  4. Any patient amenable to aortic valve replacement with a biological prosthesis should be enrolled in the study, even in conjuction with valve repair, coronary artery bypass grafting and other procedures
  5. Patient is able to return for all follow-up evaluations for the duration of the study (geographically stable).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is contra-indicated for Mitroflow DL implantation according to the Instructions for Use.
  2. The patient has a pre-existing valve prosthesis in the mitral, pulmonary, or tricsupid position.
  3. Patient requires a double or triple valve replacement (repair is not considered an exclusion).
  4. Patient has active endocarditis or myocarditis.
  5. Patient is pregnant or lactating.
  6. Patient is participating in a concomitant research study of an investigational product.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mitroflow DL
Treatment with Mitroflow Pericardial Aortic Heart Valve with Phospholipid Reduction Therapy (Model DL)
Treatment with Mitroflow Pericardial Aortic Heart Valve with Phospholipid Reduction Therapy (Model DL)
Other Names:
  • Mitroflow Pericardial Aortic Heart Valve with PRT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of structural Valve Deterioration in Implanted Patients
Time Frame: 8 years
To establish rates of structural valve deterioration through 8 years follow-up
8 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early and Late Valve-Related Adverse Event Rates
Time Frame: Early (30 days) and Late (> 30 days)
To determine early and late valve-related adverse event rates, including valve thrombosis, thromboembolism, paravalvular leak (all and major), bleeding(all and major), and endocarditis, for Mitroflow DL are comparable to appropriate historical controls
Early (30 days) and Late (> 30 days)
Early and Late Rates of hemolysis, non-structural valve dysfunction, valve-related embolism, re-operation, explant and death
Time Frame: Early (30 days) and Late (> 30 days)
To determine rates of hemolysis, non-structural dysfunction, valve-related embolism, reoperation, explant and death (all cause and valve-related)
Early (30 days) and Late (> 30 days)
Hemodynamic Performance
Time Frame: 8 years
To evaluate the hemodynamic performance of the Mitroflow DL valve as compared to other stented aortic bioprostheses in the current literature
8 years
Improvements in NYHA
Time Frame: 8 years
To evaluate the overall improvements in patient condition by comparison of pre-operative and post-operative New York Heart Associate (NYHA) functional classification
8 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Kern, MD, University of Virginia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Diseases

Clinical Trials on Mitroflow DL

3
Subscribe