- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02394704
Intervention for Intrusive Negative Thinking
December 3, 2021 updated by: Greg Siegle, University of Pittsburgh
Graduated Sensory Salience as an Intervention for Intrusive Negative Thinking
Intrusive negative thinking styles such as rumination are typical of many psychiatric disorders, are difficult to treat, and predict poor treatment outcome.
The investigators propose to evaluate a new intervention for negative thinking that capitalizes and builds on the preserved ability to attend to physical sensation.
The investigators will examine changes in physiological mechanisms and symptoms.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Intrusive negative cognitions are key features of many psychiatric disorders, are difficult to treat, and predict poor outcomes in conventional and neurobehavioral interventions.
Here, we evaluate the extent to which a novel intervention capitalizing on a preserved neurocircuitry for attending to evolutionarily salient somatosensory stimuli can be used to train attentional mechanisms to override otherwise pre-potent negative cognitions.
The initial period will involve open-label intervention refinement and mechanistic evaluation of mechanism; N=35 individuals with high levels of intrusive negative cognitions and dysphoria will be assessed pre/post intervention in the graded sensory training condition.
Success will suggest a new intervention pathway for a traditionally treatment-resistant dimension of psychopathology.
The second phase will be a randomized trial of 70 participants equally allocated to graded and non-graded training conditions.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
194
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
- Oxford Building
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria for all participants:
- Signed study consent document
- Native English speakers (learned English before age 5)
- Right handed
- 20/30 vision or better
- Free from benzodiazepines and betablockers within 8 hours of evaluations
Subject specific Inclusion Criteria
- Endorsement of chronic and intrusive negative thinking
- High scores on rumination; Response Style Questionnaire (RSQ >= 44)
- Automatic Negative Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ >= 48)
- Dysphoria; Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS>= 8)
- Must be in current treatment (either Intensive Outpatient Therapy, regular therapy sessions with a licensed provider, or close care by a psychiatrist). This is to ensure the research team is not the patient's only care provider, as this intervention is intended to be adjunct with therapy.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
- Current alcohol or substance dependence
- Psychotic disorders or psychosis
- Neurological disorders (stroke, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, epilepsy, etc.)
- Inability to complete questionnaires in English. The justification is that many of the primary analyses involve assessment of change in self-reported symptoms using measures normed in English. Participants must thus be able to read those measures to give valid indications of the extent to which they have responded to the intervention.
- Current use of any psychotropic drugs thought to affect learning, including antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, stimulants, and anti-Parkinsonian drugs. Current is defined as within 2 weeks of testing, 4 weeks for fluoxetine.
- Chronic pain that could be exacerbated by transcutaneous electrical stimulation
- Having any eye problems or difficulties in corrected vision or hearing
- Having a North American Adult Reading Test (NAART) equivalent Full Scale Intelligence Quotient < 85
- Being pregnant. Determined by self-report at the interview and by a pregnancy test
- Severe or poorly controlled concurrent medical disorders that may cause thinking disruptions or require medication that could cause negative thinking
- Current use of medications that could cause affect thinking symptoms. That is, participants need to be able to think clearly to complete the proposed information processing tasks. And they need to be able to learn to be able to make use of the intervention. Medications which compromise clear thinking or which block learning will thus be considered exclusion criteria.
- Any implanted electrical device (pacemaker, vagus nerve stimulator implant, etc.) or prior treatment with a vagus nerve stimulator
- Underwent electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) < 9 months prior to study entry.
- People who have foreign objects in their body that are not cleared for safety at 3 Tesla scanning, such as aneurysm clips or pacemakers, will be excluded from the fMRI portion of the study.
- Participants deemed "not a good fit" for the study for other reasons (such as, but not limited to, continually arriving late or rescheduling, not being a trustworthy historian or accurate reporter of symptoms, being belligerent with study staff, or presenting an active suicide risk) can also be excluded.
- Any heart condition
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Graded sensory attention training
Sensory stimuli will begin at a maximal tolerable intensity and decrease in intensity throughout the training, to shift from involuntary to voluntary attentional focus.
|
Participants will be instructed to attend to sensory stimuli and to press a button as quickly and accurately as possible while ruminating.
Stimuli will consist of vibration via a wearable subwoofer or non-painful electrical muscle stimulation (10Hz biphasic current with a pulse width of 200us with rectangular 2" electrodes placed on the back near the shoulders) or vibratory stimulation with a vibroacoustic element placed on the back near the shoulders.
Up to four sessions will be approximately 45 minutes, over the course of two weeks.
|
|
Active Comparator: Non-graded sensory attention training
Sensory stimuli will begin and be maintained at a minimal detectable intensity to maximize voluntary attentional training.
|
Participants will be instructed to attend to sensory stimuli and to press a button as quickly and accurately as possible while ruminating.
Stimuli will consist of vibration via a wearable subwoofer or non-painful electrical muscle stimulation (10Hz biphasic current with a pulse width of 200us with rectangular 2" electrodes placed on the back near the shoulders) or vibratory stimulation with a vibroacoustic element placed on the back near the shoulders.
Up to four sessions will be approximately 45 minutes, over the course of two weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sustained attention composite (computer based tasks and physiological measures)
Time Frame: two weeks (five intervention days)
|
Sustained attention is operationalized by performance on computer-based tasks (sensitivity, reaction times) and associated physiological measures (pupil dilation, eye movements, heart rate, EEG) and central measures (fMRI derived reactivity in affect, somatosensory, and attention networks).
These metrics will be interpreted together as a meta-analytic composite by counting the number of component measures with significant change in association with the intervention in comparison to a permutation-test derived critical number of indices change under the null hypothesis given the autocorrelation of the administered measures.
|
two weeks (five intervention days)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Depressive severity (patient self-report)
Time Frame: two weeks (five intervention days)
|
Clinical variables determined by patient self-report.
|
two weeks (five intervention days)
|
|
Rumination (patient self-report)
Time Frame: two weeks (five intervention days)
|
Clinical variables determined by patient self-report.
|
two weeks (five intervention days)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Greg J Siegle, Ph.D., University of Pittsburgh
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 1, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 9, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
August 17, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 19, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
March 20, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 7, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 3, 2021
Last Verified
December 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- PRO13040640
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Intrusive Negative Thinking
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingNeurofeedback | Repetitive Negative ThinkingUnited States
-
CanSagligi FoundationCompletedRepetitive Negative ThinkingTurkey
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedAnxiety | Depressive Symptoms | Negative ThinkingUnited States
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingHealthy Controls Group - Age and Sex-matched | Repetitive Negative ThinkingBelgium
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNot yet recruitingRepetitive Negative Thinking | Serious Mental Illness SymptomsUnited States
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompleted
-
Esra TayazCompleted
-
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteCompleted
-
University of IcelandUppsala UniversityActive, not recruitingIntrusive Memories of Traumatic Event(s)Iceland
Clinical Trials on Sensory attention training
-
Technical University of MunichGerman Research Foundation; Studienstiftung des deutschen VolkesCompletedExperimental Pain in Healthy Human SubjectsGermany
-
Mclean HospitalTerminatedDepression | Attention Training | Symptoms, Cognitive | Symptoms, Affective | Symptoms, BehavioralUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoCompleted
-
King's College LondonNetherlands Organisation for Scientific ResearchUnknownAnorexia NervosaUnited Kingdom
-
Palo Alto UniversityTerminated
-
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreCompleted
-
University of California, San FranciscoAlliance for Decision EducationCompletedHealthy AdolescentsUnited States
-
The University of Hong KongUnknownDevelopmental Coordination DisorderHong Kong