A Trial of a Botanical Drug Containing East Indian Sandalwood Oil (EISO) for the Treatment of Oral Mucositis

November 16, 2021 updated by: Santalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

An Open-Label, Proof of Concept, Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability Trial of a Botanical Drug Containing East Indian Sandalwood Oil (EISO) for the Prevention and Treatment of Oral Mucositis Induced by Radiation Therapy

The initial proposed clinical study will be conducted in adult head and neck cancer subjects. This will be an open-labeled, proof of concept trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of EISO in a form of oral rinse as adjunctive therapy to standard of care. Santalis believes that the proposed study is a prudent and appropriate approach to investigate the potential of their product to prevent or improve oral mucositis symptoms commonly seen in subjects undergoing radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The objectives of this proof of concept trial are: to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of SAN005 when administered to adults for the prevention and treatment of radiation induced oral mucositis.

Subjects will be instructed on the administration of study medication thrice daily till oral mucositis resolves. Subjects will return to the clinic once a week while receiving radiation and then once every two weeks once their radiation has been completed and then until their mucositis has resolved for the Final Study Visit.

Preliminary Efficacy Evaluation will be the severity of pain rated by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRPS) and mucositis grade by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria at Visit 7 (Day 36). Additional secondary efficacy evaluations will include the severity of pain rated by the NRPS and mucositis grade by RTOG criteria at each study visit, frequency of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube for feeding during the duration of treatment and weight loss from baseline through Visit 5 and 7. The time of mucositis onset and duration will also be used in assessing efficacy. Additional secondary and exploratory endpoints will be outlined in the statistical analysis plan. The overall efficacy is determined by comparing the data to historical controls. Safety will be assessed by evaluating adverse events (AEs) with respect to severity, duration, and relationship to study drug. In addition, tolerability evaluations will be performed at each study visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • UTHSCSA Cancer Therapy and Research Center (CTRC)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with head and neck cancer involving the oropharynx or oral cavity, who are expected to undergo high dose radiation therapy (i.e., ≥ 60 Gy) that typically results in oral mucositis, with or without concurrent chemotherapy or biologic targeted therapy.
  2. At least 18 years of age
  3. Estimated survival of at least 6 months.
  4. No prior radiation therapy to the head and neck area, and no chemotherapy within the last year except for induction chemotherapy delivered (or to be delivered) prior to the current course of radiation therapy
  5. Female subjects of child-bearing potential must agree to use an adequate form of contraceptive (e.g., hormonal, barrier method or abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of the trial.
  6. Are willing to refrain from using other treatments for oral mucositis until they consult with the study investigator(s).
  7. Are able to give written informed consent in a manner approved by the Institutional Review Board and comply with the requirements of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have preexisting mucositis from other causes.
  2. Are immunosuppressed or in chronic use of immunosuppressive drugs.
  3. Have a known sensitivity to any of the constituents of the test product including sensitivities to sandalwood oil, fragrances or any member of the Compositae family of vascular plants (e.g., sunflowers, daisies, dahlias, etc.).
  4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status > 3
  5. Unwilling or unable to follow the protocol requirements.
  6. Have any condition that in the opinion of the investigator would confound the efficacy, safety and tolerability assessments, such as oral thrush.
  7. Have participated in any clinical trial in the previous 30 days.
  8. Are pregnant, breastfeeding, or unwilling to practice an acceptable form of birth control during the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 0.25% EISO Mouth Rinse
A mouth rinse containing 0.25% East Indian sandalwood oil (EISO), a candidate botanical drug substance. The rinse will be used three times a day for up to ten weeks. The material will not be ingested but used to "swish, gargle and spit".
A mouth rinse to be used three times a day during the course of radiation and/or chemotherapy to prevent or minimize oral mucositis
Other Names:
  • East Indian sandalwood oil, Albuterpenoids

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients Achieving Less Than or Equal to "2" RTOG Score At Visit 9
Time Frame: Up to ten (10) weeks

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) is the measure of anatomical changes associated with oral mucositis. Patients scores will be compared to historical data of patient progression.

RTOG Scoring Criteria- Grade 0(none)- No change over baseline Grade 1(mild)- Irritation, may experience slight pain, not requiring analgesic Grade 2(moderate)- Patchy mucositis that may produce inflammatory serosanguinitis discharge; may experience moderate pain requiring analgesia Grade 3(severe) -Confluent, fibrinous mucositis, may include severe pain requiring narcotic Grade 4(life-threatening)-Ulceration, hemorrhage, or necrosis

Up to ten (10) weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subject Self Reporting Burning or Irritation
Time Frame: Up to ten (10) weeks
Calculated by the number and percentage of subjects self reporting irritation of grade 1 (mild) or higher.
Up to ten (10) weeks
NRPS (Numerical Rating Pain Scale)
Time Frame: Up to ten (10) weeks

Severity of pain in the oral cavity/oropharynx was measured using the numerical rating pain scale (NRPS) at each study visit. The NRPS is an 11-point scale from 0-10:

0 = No pain 10 = The most intense pain imaginable.

Up to ten (10) weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Will be Assessed Based on the Frequency and Severity of Adverse Events.
Time Frame: [ Time Frame: Up to ten (10) weeks ]

Adverse Events (AEs) will be assessed in accordance the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The number of patients experiencing adverse events possibly, or probably related to the study product will be reported.

Possibly related: A clinical event, including laboratory test abnormality (if applicable), with a reasonable time sequence to administration of the drug, but which could also be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs or chemicals.

Probably related: A clinical event, including laboratory test abnormality (if applicable), with a reasonable time sequence to administration of the drug, unlikely to be attributed to concurrent disease or other drugs or chemicals, and which follows a clinically reasonable response on withdrawal.

[ Time Frame: Up to ten (10) weeks ]

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Paul Castella, PhD, Santalis Pharmaceuticals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 4, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 20, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 26, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oral Mucositis

Clinical Trials on 0.25% EISO mouth rinse

Subscribe