- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02427763
Microbiological and Epithelial Evaluation Related to the Use of Orthodontic Thermoplastic Device
April 22, 2015 updated by: Luiza Cristina do Nascimento, Universidade Positivo
Epithelial Changes and Streptococci Mutans and Lactobacilli Quantify Related With the Use of Thermoplastic Aligner
Thermoplastic devices are used in orthodontic treatment and consists of a series of nearly invisible, removable aligners.
However, every device used in the mouth can change the buccal flora and increase the number of bacterias.
This is a risk factor for enamel demineralization.
The treatment can vary in time of use per day.
The patient under orthodontic treatment has to use the device for 22 hour each day.
When the period of retention comes, it is reduced to 8 hours.
The investigators want to know if the concentration of bacterias in saliva and dental plaque will increase, and if the material can cause damage on gingiva.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The orthodontic thermoplastic devices became more affordable and with simple techniques, due to the technological advancement.
The main advantage of this appliance is that it is nearly invisible, seen that patients do not want to show braces.
Others reasons for searching this kind of treatment is because it is removable.
While eating, brushing the teeth or even in a important social event, there is the facility to remove the appliance.
In the other hand this appliance, according to the american board association, does not finish the treatment as well as the conventional braces.
Another problem is that every device placed in the mouth is more plaque retentive, increasing the risk of enamel demineralization.
Also, this device disrupts the normal flow of the saliva, preventing the buffering.
This study will analyse the amount of streptococcus mutans and lactobacillus in the saliva and in the biofilm of the teeth and of the appliance, seeded in culture medium.
Another point, is check the prognosis of the gingival health owing to the contact with the device during the hole treatment.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
105
Phase
- Early Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
PR
-
Curitiba, PR, Brazil, 81280-330
- Universidade Positivo
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years to 40 years (Child, Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have stabilized their growth between 16 and 40
- Who have agreed to participate in the study if elected and to sign informed consent
- Residing in the metropolitan area of Curitiba and have the opportunity to attend recall appointments
Exclusion Criteria:
- Periodontal status deteriorated
- missing teeth
- Cleft lip and palate
- History of orthognathic surgery
- History of dental or skeletal open bite
- Presence of some habit oral tongue thrusting, mouth breathing, thumb sucking even after termination of orthodontic treatment
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Retainer use
The volunteer use a thermoplastic appliance (Essix) for 8hours Interventions:
|
the patient will use de thermoplastic device during the night or during all day
Other Names:
the patient spit during 30 seconds in a small bottle
Other Names:
a sterile swab is rubbed at the buccal surface of the upper teeth
Other Names:
a sterile cytobrush is rubbed at the buccal surface of gingiva at the upper arch
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Aligner use
The volunteer use thermoplastic appliance (Essix) for 22 hours Interventions:
|
the patient will use de thermoplastic device during the night or during all day
Other Names:
the patient spit during 30 seconds in a small bottle
Other Names:
a sterile swab is rubbed at the buccal surface of the upper teeth
Other Names:
a sterile cytobrush is rubbed at the buccal surface of gingiva at the upper arch
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
change in the amount of bacterias streptococcus mutans and lactobacillus sp. that adhere to thermoplastic device
Time Frame: baseline, 15 days, 30 days respectively
|
Collect biofilm with a sawb of the thermoplastic device and inoculated at selective plate, to verify the colony-forming unit on the sample
|
baseline, 15 days, 30 days respectively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
change in the amount of bacterias streptococcus mutans that adhere to biofilm od the teeth
Time Frame: Baseline, 15 days, 30 days respectively
|
Collect biofilm with a sawb of the upper teeth and inoculated at selective plate, to verify the colony-forming unit on the sample
|
Baseline, 15 days, 30 days respectively
|
change in the amount of bacterias lactobacillus sp. that adhere to upper teeth
Time Frame: Baseline, 15 days, 30 days, respectively
|
Collect biofilm with a sawb of the upper teeth and inoculated at selective plate, to verify the colony-forming unit on the sample
|
Baseline, 15 days, 30 days, respectively
|
change in the amount of bacterias streptococcus mutans in the saliva
Time Frame: Baseline, 15 days, 30 days, respectively
|
Collect saliva and inoculated at selective plate, to verify the colony-forming unit on the sample
|
Baseline, 15 days, 30 days, respectively
|
change in the amount of bacterias lactobacillus sp. in the saliva
Time Frame: Baseline, 15 days, 30 days, respectively
|
Collect saliva and inoculated at selective plate, to verify the colony-forming unit on the sample
|
Baseline, 15 days, 30 days, respectively
|
Check any change in the epithelium
Time Frame: Baseline, 15 days, 30 days, respectively
|
Use cytobrush to collect gingiva
|
Baseline, 15 days, 30 days, respectively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Flares Baratto Filho, PhD, Universidade Positivo
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Dincer M, Isik Aslan B. Effects of thermoplastic retainers on occlusal contacts. Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb;32(1):6-10. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp062. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
- do Nascimento LE, Pithon MM, dos Santos RL, Freitas AO, Alviano DS, Nojima LI, Nojima MC, Ruellas AC. Colonization of Streptococcus mutans on esthetic brackets: self-ligating vs conventional. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Apr;143(4 Suppl):S72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.07.017.
- Jaderberg S, Feldmann I, Engstrom C. Removable thermoplastic appliances as orthodontic retainers--a prospective study of different wear regimens. Eur J Orthod. 2012 Aug;34(4):475-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr040. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
- Low B, Lee W, Seneviratne CJ, Samaranayake LP, Hagg U. Ultrastructure and morphology of biofilms on thermoplastic orthodontic appliances in 'fast' and 'slow' plaque formers. Eur J Orthod. 2011 Oct;33(5):577-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq126. Epub 2010 Dec 27.
- Mai W, He J, Meng H, Jiang Y, Huang C, Li M, Yuan K, Kang N. Comparison of vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jun;145(6):720-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.01.019.
- Thickett E, Power S. A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear. Eur J Orthod. 2010 Feb;32(1):1-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp061. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
- Ziuchkovski JP, Fields HW, Johnston WM, Lindsey DT. Assessment of perceived orthodontic appliance attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4 Suppl):S68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.025.
- Turkoz C, Canigur Bavbek N, Kale Varlik S, Akca G. Influence of thermoplastic retainers on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus adhesion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 May;141(5):598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.11.021.
- Turkkahraman H, Sayin MO, Bozkurt FY, Yetkin Z, Kaya S, Onal S. Archwire ligation techniques, microbial colonization, and periodontal status in orthodontically treated patients. Angle Orthod. 2005 Mar;75(2):231-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)0752.0.CO;2.
- Shpack N, Greenstein RB, Gazit D, Sarig R, Vardimon AD. Efficacy of three hygienic protocols in reducing biofilm adherence to removable thermoplastic appliance. Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):161-70. doi: 10.2319/012413-75.1. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
October 1, 2014
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 22, 2015
First Posted (Estimate)
April 28, 2015
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
April 28, 2015
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 22, 2015
Last Verified
April 1, 2015
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- luiza2014
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Malocclusion
-
mahmoud abdelhameed mohamedCompleted
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompleted3D Evaluation of Powerscope Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class 2 Malocclusion (Powerscope app)Class II Malocclusion, Division 1Egypt
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompletedClass II Malocclusion, Division 1Egypt
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedClass II Malocclusion Division 1Egypt
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownClass II Malocclusion, Division 1
-
University of BaghdadRecruitingTreating Class II Malocclusion and Bimaxillary ProclinationIraq
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedClass II Malocclusion, Division 1Syrian Arab Republic
-
Al-Azhar UniversityRecruiting
-
University of AlbertaRecruiting
-
Future University in EgyptCompleted
Clinical Trials on hours of use (Essix)
-
Pacific Diabetes TechnologiesOregon Health and Science UniversityNot yet recruitingAssessment of an Integrated Continuous Glucose Monitor and Insulin Injection Port in Type 2 DiabetesType 2 Diabetes Treated With Insulin
-
University of GöttingenCompleted
-
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityCompletedCoronary Heart DiseaseChina
-
Boston Children's HospitalUnknownPediatric Rheumatological Condition (i.e., Arthritis, SLE, Kawasaki's Disaese)United States
-
University of Texas at AustinRecruiting
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedPolyp of Colon | Colo-rectal Cancer | Adenomatous Polyp of ColonUnited States
-
Eunah Cho, MDSamsung Medical CenterCompleted
-
University of BarcelonaCompletedQuality of Life | Mouth ProtectorsSpain
-
University of BernNot yet recruitingDental Caries in Children | Dental Caries | Oral Disease | Oral Manifestations | Dental Plaque | Dental DiseasesSwitzerland
-
Stanford UniversityRecruitingFood Allergy | Food Allergy in ChildrenUnited States