Prospective Comparative Study to Compare Safety and Effectiveness of Two Vertebral Compression Fracture Reduction Techniques (SAKOS)

February 21, 2019 updated by: Vexim SA

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Study to Compare the Safety and Effectiveness of Two Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF) Reduction Techniques: the SpineJack® and the KyphX Xpander® Inflatable Bone Tamp

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the SpineJack® with the Kyphx Xpander® Inflatable Bone Tamp and support a non-inferiority finding for the use of SpineJack® VCF treatment system versus Balloon Kyphoplasty.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

152

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Besancon, France
        • Hôpital Jean Minjoz Service Neurochirurgie
      • Brest, France
        • Centre Hospitalier La Cavale Blanche
      • Marseille, France
        • CHU La Timone
      • Marseille, France
        • Hopital Nord
      • Nantes, France
        • CHU Hôtel Dieu Service Neuro traumatologie
      • Bonn, Germany
        • Klinik und Poliklinik fur Orthopädie Universitatsklinikum
      • Freiburg, Germany
        • Loretto-Krankenhaus Freiburg
      • Monchengladbach, Germany
        • Krankenhaus NEUWERK Sankt Augustinus kliniken
      • Cagliari, Italy
        • Ospedale SS Trinita ASL8
      • Santander, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
      • Valladolid, Spain
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid,
      • Fribourg, Switzerland
        • HFR Fribourg - Hôpital Cantonal
      • Lausanne, Switzerland
        • Clinique Bois-Cerf

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or Female with at least 50 years of age
  2. 1 painful VCF which at least meet all following criteria:

    • Fracture due to diagnosed or presumed underlying osteoporosis
    • VCF between T7 and L3
    • Fracture age <3 months
    • VCF shows loss of height in the anterior, mid or posterior third of the VB from estimated pre-fracture configuration of at least 15% but not more than 40% based on X-Ray at baseline
    • The Index fracture is acute or persistent (not healed), as demonstrated by T2 weighted STIR MRI (or bone scan if patient is contraindicated for MRI)
  3. Patient has failed conservative medical therapy, defined as either having a VAS back pain score of ≥50 mm at 6 weeks after initiation of fracture care or a VAS back pain score of ≥70mm at 2 weeks after initiation of fracture care
  4. Investigator believes target VB is suitable for SpineJack procedure and Balloon kyphoplasty (e.g., appropriate pedicle diameter) assessed on CT scan pre op
  5. Patient has an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score of ≥ 30/100
  6. Patient is mentally capable and willing to sign a study specific informed consent as documentation of the informed consent process prior to any study procedures
  7. The patient is willing and able to comply with all study requirements including follow-up visits and radiographic assessments.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Target VCF due to underlying or suspected tumor
  2. Target VCF due to high-energy trauma
  3. Target VCF is diagnosed as an osteonecrotic fracture
  4. Segmental kyphosis of target VB of >30°
  5. Any prior surgical treatment for a vertebral body compression fracture or other surgical procedure on target VB or adjacent level
  6. The patient has uncontrolled diabetes
  7. Pre-existing or clinically unstable neurologic deficit
  8. The patient has spinal canal compromise causing clinical manifestations of cord, neural foramen, or nerve root compression at the level to be treated
  9. Any physical exam evidence of myelopathy or radiculopathy
  10. The patient has pain based on clinical diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus or severe spinal stenosis (progressive weakness or paralysis)
  11. Patient not able to walk without assistance prior to fracture
  12. Any radiographic evidence of pedicle fracture visible on CT scan pre op
  13. Spondylolisthesis >Grade 1 at target VB
  14. Any underlying systemic bone disease other than osteoporosis (e.g., osteomalacia, osteogenesis imperfect, Paget's disease, etc.)
  15. A medical contraindication to spinal surgery and/or general anesthesia, such as coagulopathy and/or taking warfarin (Coumadin) or other anticoagulant on regular basis for coagulopathy (with a threshold for normal being INR≤1.5, PTT within lab normal range, and platelet count > 100,000)
  16. Pain due to any other condition that requires daily narcotic medication
  17. Disabling back pain due to causes other than acute fracture
  18. History of intolerance or allergic reaction to titanium or acrylic compounds
  19. Active systemic or local infection at baseline
  20. Body mass index >40
  21. Severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies
  22. Any other medical illness or condition that, in the investigator's opinion, is likely to impair long-term follow-up (e.g., cancer) or greatly increase the risk of surgery including but not limited to patients with contraindications for general anesthesia (surgeon expertise)
  23. Any evidence of alcohol or drug abuse
  24. The patient has uncontrolled psychiatric illness or severe dementia
  25. The patient is currently on anti-cancer therapy or anti-HIV therapy
  26. Patient's life expectancy is less than the study duration or undergoing palliative care
  27. Participating in any other investigational study
  28. The patient is on long-term steroid therapy (steroid dose ≥ 30 mg /day for > 3 months)
  29. The patient is known to be involved in medical litigation including Workmen's Compensation
  30. Patient with contraindication for MRI
  31. The patient is pregnant or considering getting pregnant during study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SpineJack® system
VCF treatment system Vertebral fracture surgery
Vertebral augmentation for one osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture
Active Comparator: Balloon Kyphoplasty
VCF treatment system Vertebral fracture surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants With Study Success
Time Frame: 12 month post-op

The primary composite endpoint defines a successful subject if the following components are satisfied (safety and effectiveness):

  1. Reduction in VCF fracture-related pain at 12 months from baseline as measured by a 100 mm VAS scale (reduction of pain at 12 months by > 20 mm) AND,
  2. Maintenance or improvement in function at 12 months from baseline as measured by the 100 point Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) AND,
  3. Absence of device-related serious adverse events, defined as device-related adverse events (device migration, recollapse, protrusion) or symptomatic cement extravasation requiring surgical re-intervention or retreatment at the index level, including revision, removal, reoperation, and/or supplemental fixation.
12 month post-op

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Marie-Pierre HONTAS, Director Clinical Affairs, Vexim SA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis

Clinical Trials on Vertebral fracture surgery SpineJack®

Subscribe