- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02502357
Healing Statements and Their Effect on Post Operative Pain (PHSPOPC)
The Power of Healing Statements on Post Operative Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a randomized controlled trial of women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Eligible patients will be approached for study participation after they have decided to proceed with the vaginal hysterectomy with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. After enrollment, demographics including age, race, prolapse stage, and medical history will be collected. Before vaginal hysterectomy with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy in the OR, they will be randomized to the group that will be read healing statements or to the group without healing statements. Women randomized to the healing statement group will have the following statements read to them by a trained research staff member, using Peggy Huddleston's technique. Before the patient is placed under general anesthesia, the study staff member will repeat 5 times:
"Following this operation, [the participant] will feel very comfortable and [the participant] will heal very well"
Toward the end of the surgery, the study staff member will say 5 times:
"The operation has gone very well." "Following the operation, [the participant] will be hungry. [The participant] will be thirsty and urinate easily."
Prior to reading these statements to the patient, the research staff member will listen to a previously recorded audio sample of how the statements should be read with regard to tone of voice and attitude.
Patients will then fill out the VAS pain scale 6 and 24 hours after surgery. Pain medication use, dosage, type of medication will be assessed by examining electronic medical records. Time to pass void trial and time to first bowel movement will be recorded on paper and brought to the patient's 2-week follow up visit. Nausea will be assessed 6 and 24 hours after surgery using the Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Intensity Scale. Patients will be given standard post-operative instructions for a vaginal hysterectomy with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, and be told to come to the clinic in 2 weeks for a follow up visit. During this time, the will be told to keep a daily diary of pain medication use including name, dosage, and amount taken. At the 2-week visit, the patient will fill out another VAS pain scale and PFDI-20 and their pain medication diaries will be collected. The patient's overall sense of recovery will be assessed using the PGI. Once the data is collected, statistical analysis will be performed.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
District of Columbia
-
Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
- Washington Hospital Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women who undergo vaginal hysterectomy with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy
- Age ≥18 years
- English speaking
- Available for 2 week follow up
- Able to complete study questionnaires
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of chronic pain prior to surgery
- Pain during intercourse or in lower abdomen or genital region at baseline prior to index surgery (identified if patient answers yes to question 20 on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20)
- Hearing impairment
- Pregnancy by self-report or positive pregnancy test
- Active pelvic infection, herpes, candidiasis
- Indication for surgery is due to neoplasm
- History of pain syndromes including fibromyalgia, interstitial cystitis, dysmenorrhea, and depression
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Healing Statements
Patients in the healing statements group will be read healing statements during anesthesia induction, prior to undergoing surgery.
|
Before the patient in the experimental group is placed under general anesthesia, the study staff member will repeat 5 times: "Following this operation, [the participant] will feel very comfortable and [the participant] will heal very well." Toward the end of the surgery, the study staff member will say 5 times: "The operation has gone very well." "Following the operation, [the participant] will be hungry. [The participant] will be thirsty and urinate easily." |
|
No Intervention: No Healing Statements
Patients in the no healing statements group will not be read healing statements during anesthesia induction prior to undergoing surgery.
They will receive standard of care.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Baseline Pain (analyzed by VAS Numeric Pain Distress Scale)
Time Frame: baseline
|
Pain
|
baseline
|
|
Post Operative Pain (analyzed by VAS Numeric Pain Distress Scale)
Time Frame: 6 hours after surgery
|
Pain
|
6 hours after surgery
|
|
Post Operative Pain (analyzed by VAS Numeric Pain Distress Scale)
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
|
Pain
|
24 hours after surgery
|
|
Post Operative Pain (analyzed by VAS Numeric Pain Distress Scale)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery
|
Pain
|
2 weeks after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post operative Nausea and Vomiting (analyzed by Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting Intensity Scale)
Time Frame: 6 hours after surgery and 24 hours after surgery
|
Nausea and Vomiting
|
6 hours after surgery and 24 hours after surgery
|
|
Time to First Bowel Movement
Time Frame: Followed for 2 weeks after surgery
|
Bowel Movement
|
Followed for 2 weeks after surgery
|
|
Time to Pass Void Trial (Urination)
Time Frame: Followed for 2 weeks after surgery
|
Urination
|
Followed for 2 weeks after surgery
|
|
Patient Perception of Improvement
Time Frame: 2 weeks after surgery
|
Patient Perception of Improvement measured by Patient Global Perception of Improvement Scale
|
2 weeks after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Cheryl Iglesia, MD, MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Evans C, Richardson PH. Improved recovery and reduced postoperative stay after therapeutic suggestions during general anaesthesia. Lancet. 1988 Aug 27;2(8609):491-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90131-6.
- Block RI, Ghoneim MM, Sum Ping ST, Ali MA. Efficacy of therapeutic suggestions for improved postoperative recovery presented during general anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1991 Nov;75(5):746-55. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199111000-00005.
- Liu WH, Standen PJ, Aitkenhead AR. Therapeutic suggestions during general anaesthesia in patients undergoing hysterectomy. Br J Anaesth. 1992 Mar;68(3):277-81. doi: 10.1093/bja/68.3.277.
- McLintock TT, Aitken H, Downie CF, Kenny GN. Postoperative analgesic requirements in patients exposed to positive intraoperative suggestions. BMJ. 1990 Oct 6;301(6755):788-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.301.6755.788.
- Huddleston P. Prepare for Surgery, Heal Faster: A Guide of Mindy-Body Techniques. Angel River Press, 2012.
- Watters M, Feldman J, Schoetz D, Abrams M, Goy C, Catman M, Huddleston P. The Power of Relaxation: A Holistic Approach to Preoperative Patient Education.
- Huddleston M, Bierbaum B. Cost-effectiveness of Using Mind-Body Techniques for Total Knee-Joint Replacement.
- Hutchings DD. The value of suggestion given under anesthesia: A report and evaluation of 200 cases. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 1961; 26-29.
- Furlong M. Positive suggestions presented during anaesthesia. Memory and Awareness in Anaesthesia (Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1990).
- Lebovits AH, Twersky R, McEwan B. Intraoperative therapeutic suggestions in day-case surgery: are there benefits for postoperative outcome? Br J Anaesth. 1999 Jun;82(6):861-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/82.6.861.
- Wolfe LS, Millet JB. Control of postoperative pain by suggestion under general anesthesia. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 1960; 3:109-112.
- Steinberg ME, Hord AH, Reed B, Sebels PS. Study of the effect of intraoperative analgesia and well-being. Memory and Awareness in Anesthesia (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prenctice Hall, 1993).
- Shah NM, Andriani LA, Mofidi JL, Ingraham CF, Tefera EA, Iglesia CB. Therapeutic Suggestion in Postoperative Pain Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jul 1;27(7):409-414. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000906.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2015-043
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse
-
NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsRecruitingPelvic Organ Prolapse | Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal Surgery | Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Patient Education | Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)United States
-
Hillel Yaffe Medical CenterCompletedHysterectomy | Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal Surgery | Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)Israel
-
Wolfson Medical CenterRecruiting
-
University of CalgaryAlberta Health services; Cook Group IncorporatedCompletedAnterior Pelvic Organ ProlapseCanada
-
Queen's UniversityNot yet recruitingPelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)Canada
-
Coloplast A/SCompletedPelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)United States
-
A.M.I. Agency for Medical Innovations GmbHActive, not recruitingProlapse | Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) | SacrocolpopexyGermany
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedPelvic Organ Prolapse, Patient EducationCanada
-
Chung Shan Medical UniversityActive, not recruitingPelvic Organ Prolapse | Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal Surgery | Sacrocolpopexy | PectopexyTaiwan
-
University of MelbourneCompletedVaginal Hysterectomy | Pelvic Organ Prolapse Vaginal SurgeryAustralia
Clinical Trials on Healing Statements
-
Henning BliddalOak Foundation; The Danish Rheumatism Association; The IMK FoundationCompletedRheumatoid Arthritis
-
University of TromsoSorlandet Hospital HFNot yet recruiting
-
London School of Economics and Political ScienceHarvard Medical School / Harvard Pilgrim Health Care InstituteCompleted
-
University of AlbertaAlberta Health & Wellness; Merck Frosst Canada Ltd.; Canadian Diabetes Association and other collaboratorsCompletedHypertension | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1Canada
-
University of Southern DenmarkUniversity of Aarhus; The Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, DenmarkCompleted
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaRecruitingWound Heal | Dental Implant | Immediate Dental ImplantSpain
-
Chiang Mai UniversityEnrolling by invitationPeri-implant Tissue Response With Use of Customized Healing AbutmentsThailand
-
Alexandria UniversityCompleted
-
Ana Molina VillarUnknown