Does Outpatient Palliative Care Improve Patient-centered Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease?

January 22, 2020 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver
The purpose of this study is to improve outcomes for persons living with Parkinson's Disease (PD) and their family caregivers. The investigators hypothesize that outpatient interdisciplinary palliative care will improve patient-centered outcomes for PD patients at high-risk for poor outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Palliative care is an approach to caring for individuals with life-threatening illnesses that addresses potential causes of suffering including physical symptoms such as pain, psychiatric symptoms such as depression, psychosocial issues and spiritual needs. Palliative care approaches have been successfully applied to improve patient-centered outcomes in cancer as well as several chronic progressive illnesses including heart failure and pulmonary disease. To date there have been minimal attempts to apply these principles to PD although preliminary evidence suggests that PD patients have significant unmet needs under current models of care which may be amenable through a palliative care model. This study will provide critical information to forward this field including data on the comparative effectiveness of outpatient palliative care for PD versus current standards of care; effects of this intervention on cost and service utilization; and the characteristics of patients most likely to benefit from such an approach and the specific services most needed by PD patients and their caregivers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

210

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E1
        • University of Alberta Canada
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California, San Francisco
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fluent in English
  • UK Brain Bank criteria for diagnosis of probable PD or Multiple Systems Atrophy (MSA) or Corticobasal Degeneration (CBD) or Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) or Lewy Body Dementia (LBD)
  • At high risk for poor outcomes as identified by the Palliative Care Needs Assessment Tool (PC-NAT)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Immediate and urgent palliative care needs
  • Unable or unwilling to commit to study procedures including;

    1. randomization,
    2. study visits or
    3. the addition of a neurologist to their care team
  • Presence of additional chronic medical illnesses which may require palliative services
  • Already receiving palliative care and/or hospice services.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Standard of Care
Usual care as in including both a Primary Care Physician (PCP) and neurologist.
Usual care defined as including both a PCP and neurologist
Active Comparator: Interdisciplinary outpatient palliative care
Usual care augmented by an outpatient interdisciplinary palliative care team.
Interdisciplinary outpatient palliative care is an approach to caring for individuals with life-threatening illnesses that addresses potential causes of suffering including physical symptoms such as pain, psychiatric symptoms such as depression, psychosocial issues and spiritual needs. Palliative care approaches have been successfully applied to improve patient-centered outcomes in cancer as well as several chronic progressive illnesses including heart failure and pulmonary disease.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the Subjects Quality of Life (QOL)
Time Frame: 0 to 6 months
The QOL-AD (Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease) survey will be used to measure the differences in the quality of life between groups.Higher numbers indicate better outcomes. The scale ranges from 4 to 52.
0 to 6 months
Changes in Caregiver Distress
Time Frame: 0 to 6 months
The Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview Form (ZBI) will be used to measure differences in Caregiver Distress between groups. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. Scale ranges from 0 to 48.
0 to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Patient Anxiety
Time Frame: 0 to 6 months
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to quantify changes in patient anxiety. Higher numbers indicate worse outcomes. Scale ranges from 0 to 21.
0 to 6 months
Changes in Patient Depression
Time Frame: 0 to 6 months
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to quantify changes in patient depression. Higher numbers indicate worse outcomes. Scale ranges from 0 to 21.
0 to 6 months
Changes in Caregiver Anxiety
Time Frame: 0 to 6 months
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to quantify changes in caregiver anxiety. Higher numbers indicate worse outcomes. Scale ranges from 0 to 21.
0 to 6 months
Changes in Caregiver Depression
Time Frame: 0 to 6 months
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used to quantify changes in caregiver depression. Higher numbers indicate worse outcomes. Scale ranges from 0 to 21.
0 to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benzi Kluger, University of Colorado - Anschutz Medical Campus

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care

3
Subscribe