Medial Plica Syndrome of the Knee: Conservative Treatment Versus Arthroscopic Plica Resection - a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

October 6, 2017 updated by: Steffen Sauer, Regionshospitalet Silkeborg
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the effect of conservative treatment in comparison to arthroscopic resection of pathological medial plicae of the knee for patients with medial plica syndrome. The investigators expect conservative treatment to be significantly superior to arthroscopic plica resection with regard to symptom remission and return to prior functional level.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Silkeborg, Denmark, 8600
        • Recruiting
        • Regionshospital Silkeborg
        • Contact:
      • Silkeborg, Denmark, 8600
        • Recruiting
        • Regionshospitalet Silkeborg
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged over 18 years
  • History of antermedial knee pain
  • Palpable medial band in clinical examination or medial plica appearence on MRI
  • Absence of all of the following diagnoses: Osteoarthritis, osteochondritis dissecans, meniscal injury, patella subluxation, pes anserinus bursit, patellofemoral pain syndrome
  • Given declaration of consent
  • Joining a fitness centre for the duration of minimum 3 months at their own expense.

Exclusion Criteria:

Aged under 18 years

  • Presence of one or more of the following diagnoses: Osteoarthritis, osteochondritis dissecans, meniscal injury, patella subluxation, pes anserinus bursit, patellofemoral pain syndrome
  • Prior surgical intervention, infection, fracture or patellar luxation concerning the relevant knee
  • Not willing to join a fitness centre for the duration of minimum 3 months at their own expense

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conservative treatment
Plica resection vs conservative treatment
Active Comparator: surgery
Plica resection vs conservative treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lysholm-Scale (Units on a scale)
Time Frame: 2 years
Difference of minimum 5 points concerning the average scoring outcome on the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scala in favor of patients undergoing conservative treatment in comparison to patients undergoing arthroscopic plica resection at 2 year follow up. Units of measure (Units on a scale)
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kujala-Scale (Units on a scale)
Time Frame: 2 years
Secondary endpoints: Higher average scoring outcome on the Anterior Knee Pain Scala (Kujala) in favor of patients undergoing conservative treatment in comparison to patients undergoing arthroscopic plica resection at 2 year follow up. Lower average results on Visual Anologue Scale concerning knee pain while walking indicated by patients undergoing conservative treatment in comparison to patients undergoing arthroscopic plica resection at 2 year follow up. Units of measure (Units on a scale)
2 years
QOL-Scale (Units on a scale)
Time Frame: 2 years
Higher average scoring outcome on the Quality of Life Scala (extracted from KOOS) in favor of patients undergoing conservative treatment in comparison to patients undergoing arthroscopic plica resection at 2 year follow up. Units of measure (Units on a scale)
2 years
VAS-Scale (Visual Analog Scale for pain) (Units on a scale)
Time Frame: 2 years
Lower average results on Visual Anologue Scale concerning knee pain while walking indicated by patients undergoing conservative treatment in comparison to patients undergoing arthroscopic plica resection at 2 year follow up. Units of measure (Units on a scale)
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 280981PM

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Plica Mediopatellaris

Clinical Trials on Plica resection vs conservative treatment

Subscribe