Prospective Clinical Analysis of Ultrasound-guided Biceps Corticosteroid Injections

July 14, 2022 updated by: Jeremy A Alland, Rush University Medical Center
Using randomization, prospectively determine superiority of either ultrasound-guided or landmark-guided biceps corticosteroid injections with regard to various clinical variables.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients are diagnosed with biceps tendinitis in the outpatient clinic. After diagnosis, all the patients that meet inclusion/exclusion criteria will be offered to enroll in the study. Study will be described to the patient with regard to protocol and consent. All questions regarding the study will be answered, and it will be explicitly described that the study involvement will not change clinical care. It will be explained that investigators expect a follow up appointment at minimum at three weeks and three months. There may be further follow up requested up to 1 year from enrollment.

After collection of informed consent, the patient will be randomized to either ultrasound-guided or landmark-guided injection. The patient will complete clinical scores at the initial visit prior to the injection. After injection, the patient will have follow up scheduled for three weeks and three months. To ensure patient blinding, an ultrasound will be placed on the patient for both groups, but only active imaging with be performed for the ultrasound-guided patient group. For clinician blinding, a different clinician than the injecting clinician will perform the follow up examinations. The patient is instructed to not seek additional injections or physical therapy during the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Midwest Orthopeadics at Rush

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pain at intertubercular groove
  • Anterior humeral pain
  • Positive Speed's Test
  • Bicep's tendinitis is primary diagnosis for patient
  • Patient agrees to follow up and consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior biceps surgery or injections
  • Prior SLAP or labral repair
  • Concomitant shoulder arthroplasty

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ultrasound-guided Injection
Injection performed with ultrasound-guidance
Using ultrasound-guidance to perform a corticosteroid injection
Corticosteroid used in injection (40 mg)
Anesthesic used in injection
Active Comparator: Landmark-guided Injection
Injection performed at point of maximal tenderness along biceps tendon
Corticosteroid used in injection (40 mg)
Anesthesic used in injection
Using landmark-guidance to perform a corticosteroid injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Simple Shoulder Test
Time Frame: 1 year
12 question assessment of shoulder function with yes or no answers
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Injection

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound-guidance

Subscribe