Double Lock Versus Continuous Non-locking Technique for Closure of Rectus Sheath in Cesarean Sections on Post-operative Pain

July 30, 2017 updated by: dr mohammed elsafty, Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
In this trial we compare the effect of 2 closure techniques of the rectus sheath during cesarean sections on postoperative pain. One closure technique is double lock technique and the other is the conventional continuous non-locking technique.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • first cesarean section

Exclusion Criteria:

  • urgent cesarean section
  • previous abdominal surgery
  • previous cesarean section
  • obstetric and medical complications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: group a
This arm will have lower segment cesarean section done with double locking technique for closure of Rectus Sheath.
Procedure: lower segment cesarean section and double lock closure of rectus sheath
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: group b
This arm will have lower segment cesarean section done with continuous non-locking technique for closure of rectus sheath.
Procedure: lower segment cesarean section and continuous non-locking closure of rectus sheath

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
postoperative pain evaluated by VAS
Time Frame: first week postoperative
first week postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
operative time
Time Frame: intraoperative
intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Ain Shams Maternity Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 10, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2476ASU

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on lower segment cesarean section and double lock closure of rectus sheath

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Turkmenistan

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe