Reoxygenation After Cardiac Arrest II (REOX II Study) (REOX II)

March 7, 2022 updated by: The Cooper Health System
The broad objective of this study is to test the association between hyperoxia exposure after resuscitation from cardiac arrest and outcome. After obtaining written informed consent subjects enrolled in REOX II will undergo a rapid faction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) optimization protocol to prevent exposure to hyperoxia. We will compare outcomes between subjects enrolled in REOX I (observational study only) and REOX II (intervention: rapid FiO2 optimization protocol). Our overarching hypothesis is that exposure to hyperoxia after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is associated with increased oxidative stress and worsened neurological and cognitive outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Specific Aim 1: Test if initiation of the rapid FiO2 optimization protocol following ROSC from cardiac arrest is associated with the degree of in vivo oxidative stress during the post-resuscitation phase of therapy.

Approach: We will conduct a multicenter interventional study (FiO2 optimization protocol) of adult patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest. We will record data pertaining to oxygenation parameters and other factors and measure biomarkers of oxidative stress [isoprostanes (IsoPs) and isofurans (IsoFs)] in the plasma at 0 and 6 hours after ROSC using gas chromatography negative ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry. We will compare plasma IsoPs/IsoFs at each time point between subjects enrolled in REOX II (i.e. receive the study intervention, rapid FiO2 optimization) and REOX I (i.e. do not receive the study intervention) using t-test or Mann-Whitney U as appropriate with corrections for multiple comparisons.

Specific Aim 2: Test if initiation of the rapid FiO2 optimization protocol following ROSC from cardiac arrest is associated with a decrease in neurological disability at hospital discharge.

Approach: In the study described above, we will determine the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at hospital discharge. We will compare proportions of good neurological outcome [defined as a mRS ≤ 3] between subjects enrolled in REOX II (i.e. receive the study intervention, rapid FiO2 optimization) vs. those enrolled in REOX I (i.e. do not receive the study intervention), using binomial test.

Specific Aim 3: Test if initiation of the rapid FiO2 optimization protocol following ROSC from cardiac arrest is associated with neuropsychological outcomes among survivors at 180 days.

Approach: In the study described above, we will assess neuropsychological outcome among survivors at 180 days. Neuropsychological testing will use validated instruments across five cognitive domains (attention, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV-digit span; (2) reasoning, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV-similarities; (3) immediate and delayed memory, Wechsler Memory Scale-III-logical memory I and II; (4) verbal fluency, Controlled Oral Word Association Test; and (5) executive functioning, Hayling Sentence Completion Test). Among survivors, we will compare the 180-day neuropsychological measures (composite z-scores for each cognitive domain) between the same two groups using t-test or Mann-Whitney U as appropriate with corrections for multiple comparisons. We will also compare the proportions of patients able to return to work between the two groups using binomial test

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University/ Methodist Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    • Mississippi
      • Jackson, Mississippi, United States, 39216
        • University of Mississippi Medical Center
    • New Jersey
      • Camden, New Jersey, United States, 08103
        • Cooper University Hospital
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and Penn Presbyterian Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >17 years
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Return of spontaneous circulation
  • Not following commands immediately after ROSC
  • Endotracheal intubation
  • Clinician intent to treat with therapeutic hypothermia (or absence of clinician intent to withhold therapeutic hypothermia)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presumed etiology of arrest is trauma
  • Presumed etiology of arrest is hemorrhage
  • Presumed etiology of arrest is sepsis
  • Permanent resident of nursing home or other long-term care facility
  • Any other condition, that in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the subject from being a suitable candidate, e.g. end stage chronic illness with no reasonable expectation of survival to hospital discharge

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Adult patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest
Rapid FiO2 optimization protocol
We plan to test a protocol for FiO2 optimization for mechanically ventilated post-cardiac arrest subjects, with a therapeutic goal of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) of 60-99 mmHg, based on the PaO2 range that was associated with the lowest risk of poor outcome in our previously published work. We also use PaO2 (measured by arterial blood gas [ABG] analysis) as the ultimate goal rather than arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) measured by pulse oximetry because an SaO2 value <100% on pulse oximetry monitoring does not always exclude supranormal PaO2. The protocol in this application begins with very rapid reduction of FiO2 as much as possible according to SaO2 values, and when FiO2 is maximally reduced by SaO2 an ABG is measured, followed by finer adjustment of FiO2 to achieve a PaO2 60-99 mmHg. The protocol not only prescribes each downward titration of FiO2 but it also includes detailed limbs for upward titration of FiO2 to account for potential "overshoot" in FiO2 reduction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Plasma Isofurans (pg/mL)/Isoprostanes (pg/mL) Ratio
Time Frame: Change in the isofurans/isoprostanes ratio between 0 and 6 hours post-ROSC
Change in the isofurans/isoprostanes ratio between 0 and 6 hours post-ROSC

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (Primary Neurological Outcome)
Time Frame: Upon hospital discharge, on average two weeks

0: No symptoms at all

  1. No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities
  2. Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance
  3. Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance
  4. Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance
  5. Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention
  6. Dead
Upon hospital discharge, on average two weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite Neuropsychological Testing Score
Time Frame: 180 days
The neuropsychological testing uses validated instruments across five cognitive domains: (1) attention, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV-digit span; (2) reasoning, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV-similarities; (3) immediate and delayed memory, Wechsler Memory Scale-III-logical memory I and II; (4) verbal fluency, Controlled Oral Word Association Test; and (5) executive functioning, Hayling Sentence Completion Test.
180 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Stephen Trzeciak, MD, MPH, The Cooper Health System

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 29, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrest

Clinical Trials on Protocol for rapid FiO2 optimization

3
Subscribe