Peripheral Metabolic Function in Chronic Heart Failure Patients

April 4, 2016 updated by: Anders Rasmussen Rinnov

Peripheral Metabolic Function in Chronic Heart Failure Patients: Key to Lessen the Cardiac Load

Exercise intolerance is a major limiting symptom in patients with CHF. However the poor correlation between the hemodynamic parameters of left ventricular performance at rest and exercise performance has led to the concept that peripheral factors such as muscle perfusion and muscle metabolism play a role as determinants of exercise capacity.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The pathophysiology behind the breathlessness and fatigue experienced by CHF patients during exercise remains unclear. Recent evidence suggests that the peripheral skeletal muscle, which becomes abnormal in heart failure, is the source of afferent signals which disrupt normal patterns of cardiorespiratory control. When CHF patients exercise, an inappropriately strong sympathetic response further limits exercise tolerance by evoking larger than normal increases in peripheral sympathetic activation at a faster rate than in healthy individuals. A consequence of this exacerbated sympathetic response may be the further sympathetic restraint of blood flow to the active skeletal muscles resulting in hypoperfusion of the muscle vascular bed and fatigue. Small muscle mass exercise training increases muscle oxidative capacity and improves aerobic work capacity in CHF patients. A range of studies is proposed here that will provide an integrative view of the mechanistic basis behind exercise intolerance in CHF and relate the intramuscular metabolic status to the autonomic control of hemodynamics during exercise. An understanding of the mechanistic basis of the improved exercise tolerance with training, independent of improved resting cardiac function, will yield important information regarding the integrated control of blood flow and metabolic demand in CHF and highlight the importance of maintaining the integrity of the peripheral musculature in CHF.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Recruiting
        • Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism (CIM), Centre for Physical Activity Research
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II - III
  • Ejection fraction <35%
  • Heart failure as a result of previous myocardial infarction
  • Optimal treatment (ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers)
  • Stable heart failure
  • Patients with and without implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Peripheral vascular disease with symptoms of atherosclerosis (intermittent claudication)
  • Aneurysm in a. femoral
  • Moderate to severe heart valve disease
  • Moderate to severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with FEV1 <60%
  • Heart Failure Patients with Biventricular pacemaker (BVP)
  • Serious heart rhythm disturbances (arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation and frequent premature ventricular contractions)
  • Myocardial infarction within the last month
  • Unstable angina (angina pectoris)
  • Renal failure (creatinine greater than 2.5 mg / dL)
  • Severe systemic disease of the nervous system, pulmonary or other severe organ involvement
  • BMI> 30
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exercise training - Whole body exercise
Control subjects will train 2-legged cycling (whole body exercise) for 6 weeks
All gruoups will undergo 6 weeks of training intervention either with a small musclemass (one-legged exercise) or whole body exercise (two-legged cycling)
Experimental: Exercise training - One-legged exercise
Control subjects will train high intense one-legged exercise for 6 weeks
All gruoups will undergo 6 weeks of training intervention either with a small musclemass (one-legged exercise) or whole body exercise (two-legged cycling)
Experimental: Exercise training - 2-legged cycling CHF
CHF patients will train 2-legged cycling (whole body exercise) for 6 weeks
All gruoups will undergo 6 weeks of training intervention either with a small musclemass (one-legged exercise) or whole body exercise (two-legged cycling)
Experimental: Exercise training - CHF
CHF Patients will train high intense one-legged exercise for 6 weeks
All gruoups will undergo 6 weeks of training intervention either with a small musclemass (one-legged exercise) or whole body exercise (two-legged cycling)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline sympathetic nerve activity after 6 weeks of training
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Sympathetic nerve activity, measured in plasma and dialysat with reference to nor-adrenaline.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The effect of exercise training on exercise capacity in regards to oxygen uptake
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Exercise capacity in regards to oxygen uptake (VO2peak) will be evaluated before and after the training intervention
6 weeks
The effect of exercise training on exercise capacity in regards to maximal workload
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Exercise capacity in regards to Workload during 2-legged cycling (Wattpeak) will be evaluated before and after the training intervention
6 weeks
The effect of exercise training on exercise capacity in regards to a 6 min walk test
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Exercise capacity in regards to a 6 min walk test (meters) will be evaluated before and after the training intervention
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Stefan P Mortensen, Dr. Med, IMM - Department of Cardiovascular and Renal Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VEK-H-3-2013-048

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Exercise training

3
Subscribe