Impact of Rehabilitation in Quality of Life in PD

April 3, 2017 updated by: Ilaria Zivi, Ospedale Generale Di Zona Moriggia-Pelascini

Impact of an Intensive Multi-Disciplinary Rehabilitation Treatment on Quality Of Life in Subjects With Parkinson's Disease

This study is aimed to evaluate the impact of an intensive, multidisciplinary rehabilitative program on quality of life in patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease clinically characterized by rigidity, bradykinesia and resting tremor. Beyond these symptoms the principal feature of this condition is the lost of habitual automatic movements and the disruption of different cognitive-motivational processes. These features are related to a pathological dopaminergic tone that alters the cortico-striatal pathways with several consequences on motor and emotional behaviours. Given its complexity PD impact very seriously on patients' quality of life (QoL).

Dopamine replacement therapy (DRT) is the standard treatment for the motor symptom of PD and previous studies have demonstrated its positive effect on QoL. However DRT does not reduce axial PD symptoms such as freezing of gait, postural instability and balance disturbances. Further, long-term DRT could negatively impact on cognitive and motivational functions and leads to different motor and behavioural side effects.

In the last years, rehabilitation has been proposed as an effective and complementary treatment for the management of PD and several evidences highlighted the need of a multidisciplinary and intensive approach to achieve good results.

To evaluate the impact of an intensive, multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment (MIRT), on QoL of subjects with PD. Literature data showed that this type of treatment determine a positive effect on both motor and non-motor symptoms. Starting from these evidences, in this study the investigators have examined whether MIRT act positively on QoL and for how long this potential positive effect is maintained.

250 PD patients with Parkinson's Disease hospitalized for a 4-weeks MIRT were enrolled. PDQ39 was administered at enrolment, and at three points after discharge: at 1, 3 and 6 months. The investigators decided to evaluate QoL after homecoming in order to avoid an inpatient state bias. Other outcome measures were considered and assessed at the enrolment and at discharge: Unified Parkinson's Disease Scale (UPDRS), Parkinson Disease Disability Scale (PDDS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), FOG (Freezing of Gait Questionnaire), 6MWT (6 minutes walking Test), Time Up and Go test (TUG). Cognitive and psychopathological status of patients was also assessed using Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB), State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAY I-II), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Como
      • Gradevole ed Uniti, Como, Italy, 22015
        • Department of Parkinson's Disease and Brain Injury Rehabilitation, of the 'Moriggia-Pelascini' Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parkinson Disease
  • MMSE ≥ 24

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Co-morbidity with other neurological disease
  • Visual and auditory dysfunctions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rehabilitative treatment (MIRT)
Rehabilitative treatment MIRT consist in daily sessions of: motor treatment, occupational therapy and language speech therapy
MIRT consists of a 4-week physical therapy that entails four daily sessions, five days a week, in a hospital setting. The duration of each session is about one hour. The first session comprise cardiovascular warm-up activities, relaxation, muscle- stretching, exercises to improve the range of motion of spinal, pelvic and scapular joints, exercises to improve the functionality of the abdominal muscles, and postural changes in the supine position. The second session includes aerobic exercises to improve balance and gait using a stabilometric platform, treadmill plus, crossover and cycloergometer. The third is a session of occupational therapy to improve autonomy in daily living activities. The last session includes one hour of speech therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parkinson Disease Questionnaire (PDQ39)
Time Frame: 6 month
The PDQ-39 is a 39-item self-report questionnaire, which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality over the last month Each dimension total score range from 0 (never have difficulty) to 100 (always have difficulty). Lower scores reflect better QoL
6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month
six minute walking test (6MWT)
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month
Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FoG)
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month
Parkinson Disease Disability Scale
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe