Mobile Service Robot for Task-Oriented Stroke Therapy: User Evaluations

June 21, 2021 updated by: University of Pennsylvania
By developing an affordable mobile service robot for therapeutic activities in a health center environment, this project addresses the issue of both the high cost and man-power required to provide rehabilitation for stroke survivors and other patients. Our goal is to measure users - clinician and patient - responses to a telepresence robot, VGo, that has been modified with a humanoid torso robot, NAO, to facilitate remote communication between the patient and clinician, and to complete supervisory exercise coaching.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a short demonstration and survey study. Clinical staff and patients will be gathered together and our idea for the mobile service robot will discussed. A demonstration of the telepresence feature of the robots and the NAO robot greeting and helping them with simple exercises will follow (e.g., pick up and object that is handy and lift their hands over their heads). The approximately 30-minute demonstration part of the study will start with an introduction and explanation about the project and a short speech about the Rehabilitation and Robotics Lab. After the demonstration the oral consent will be read and surveys will be handed out to those study participants who agree to complete them; if necessary, the research team will assist the study participant with the survey. Surveys will then be collected, and the group will be thanked by the research team.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19146
        • Penn Medicine Rittenhouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Therapists with neuro-rehab experience. Patients with neural injury.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Certified rehabilitation healthcare professionals
  • Participants with upper extremity disabilities
  • Participant must be older than 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

-Less than 18 years of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Focus groups- Patients
Subjects with or without an upper extremity disability will be asked to observe and interact with the mobile service robot.
The goal is to build a low-cost mobile service robot that will focus on the simple, but key, repetitive, data-driven tasks that robots do well. Rather than attempt to create a robot helper that mimics humans, the goal is to free human caregivers from the time-consuming tasks that robots can accomplish with facility, thereby allowing humans to focus on tasks that humans do best (i.e. human contact). This survey differs in terms of design questions.
Focus Groups-clinicians
Clinicians with neuro-rehab experience.
The goal is to build a low-cost mobile service robot that will focus on the simple, but key, repetitive, data-driven tasks that robots do well. Rather than attempt to create a robot helper that mimics humans, the goal is to free human caregivers from the time-consuming tasks that robots can accomplish with facility, thereby allowing humans to focus on tasks that humans do best (i.e. human contact).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perception of the interaction with the robot
Time Frame: up to 1 week
Perception of the robot measured by surveys administered to participants as well as by observation with the robot.
up to 1 week
Usability of the robot
Time Frame: up to 1 week
Portability, ease of set up, cost, and appearance measured by surveys administered to participants as well as by observation with the robot.
up to 1 week
Sociability with the robot
Time Frame: up to 1 week
Sociability of robot measured by surveys administered to participants as well as by observation with the robot.
up to 1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Design requirements
Time Frame: up to 1 week
Design requirements measured by surveys administered to participants as well as by observation with the robot.
up to 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michelle J Johnson, PhD, Penn Medicine Rittenhouse

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Wilk R. and Johnson MJ. 5th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics. ; 08/2014. doi:10.1109/BIOROB.2014.6913816

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Mobile Service Robot Survey for Patients

3
Subscribe