- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05131490
Effect on Adaptation to Cancer of Mobile Application Developed for Gynecological Cancer Patients
Effect on Physical and Psychosocial Adaptation of Mobile Application Developed for Gynecological Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This study was planned as a parallel, single-blind, pre-post-test randomized controlled experimental study in which two groups (experiment-control) will be compared. The block randomization method will be used. The patients who will participate in the research will be reached through social media networks related to cancer (Facebook and Instagram account of the Dance with Cancer Association, etc.) and the data will be collected from patients who are suitable for the sample characteristics through mobile application. The sample size was calculated in the G*power statistics program by utilizing the data of a study in which on cancer patients using a mobile application intervention was previously performed (α =0.05, d=0.75). Accordingly, it was found that 23 people should be taken for each group to sampling for 80% power. Considering that there might be losses, the number of samples was increased by 10% and it was planned to include a total of 52 people in the study. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed to manage bias and losses.
A pilot application will be conducted for 4 weeks with 6 patients regarding the usability of the mobile application and these patients will not be included in the study. At the end of 4 weeks, feedback will be received from the patients participating in the pilot application with the mobile application evaluation form. Necessary changes will be made in the mobile application in line with the feedback.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Denizli, Turkey
- Pamukkale University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be over 18 years old
- Be at least primary school graduate
- Volunteering to participate in research
- Being diagnosed with gynecological cancer for the first time (no cancer recurrence)
- Receiving at least one course of chemotherapy and continuing chemotherapy treatment
- Be Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale score below 3
- Be not have a psychiatric illness
- Owning a smartphone
- Be have internet access and have used any mobile application before
Exclusion Criteria:
- Be have any psychiatric illness
- Be have not yet received or completed chemotherapy treatment
- Be Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale score of 3 and above
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimental
Experimental group intervention consists two months a mobile application intervention developed for gynecological cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
|
The mobile application will consist of modules. It is planned to include four education modules and consultancy modules in the application.
|
|
No Intervention: No intervention
Control group receive routine care.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Psychosocial Adjustment to İllnes Scale-Self Report (PAIS-SR)
Time Frame: Change from baseline PAIS-SR score at 4 and 8 weeks
|
The scale measures the interaction of individuals with other individuals and institutions forming the socio-cultural environment and consists of 7 sub-dimensions.
These; Health Care Orientation (8 items); Vocational Environment (6 items); Domestic Environment (8 items); Sexual Relationship (6 items); extended family relationships (5 items); social environment (6 items); psychological pressure (7 items) it consists of 46 items in total, including.
It is calculated by giving scores ranging from 0 to 3 for the items in the scale.
Major negative changes since illness are scored with 3 points, no change or positive changes with 0 points.
A score below 35 indicates "good psychosocial adjustment", a score between 35 and 51 indicates "moderately good psychosocial adjustment", and a score above 51 indicates "poor psychosocial adjustment".
An increase in the score is an indication of difficulty in adaptation and deterioration.
|
Change from baseline PAIS-SR score at 4 and 8 weeks
|
|
MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI)
Time Frame: Change from baseline MDASI score at 4 and 8 weeks
|
It is a short inventory that measures the impact and severity of cancer-related symptoms. Each symptom is evaluated at 11 levels (0=no symptoms, 10=very bad). The scale consists of two sub-dimensions and 19 items. In the first part of the inventory, "symptoms" (13 items), in the second part "inhibition of the individual's life" (6 items) and the situation in the last 24 hours are evaluated. In the event that the life of the individual in the second part of the inventory is hindered; general activity, mood, work and/or works in home, relationships with other people, walking, enjoying life are evaluated. A high score indicates an increase in the severity of the symptom and a negative impact on life. |
Change from baseline MDASI score at 4 and 8 weeks
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline HADS score at 4 and 8 weeks
|
The aim of the scale is not to diagnose, but to determine the risk group by scanning anxiety and depression in a short time in patients with physical illness. The scale has anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) subscales. The scale is a self-report scale and consists of 14 items, 7 of which investigate symptoms of anxiety and 7 of which investigate symptoms of depression. Responses are evaluated on a four-point Likert scale and scored between 0-3. Odd numbers measure anxiety, even numbers measure depression. For both subscales, "7 and below" non-patients, "8-10" borderline patients, and "11 and above" patient evaluations were deemed appropriate. The scoring of each item in the scale is different. Items 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, and 13 show decreasing severity and the scoring is 3, 2, 1, 0. On the other hand, the 2nd, 4th, 7th, 9th, 12th and 14th items are scored as 0, 1, 2, 3, respectively. The lowest score that can be obtained from both subscales is 0, and the highest score is 21. |
Change from baseline HADS score at 4 and 8 weeks
|
|
Assessment of Survivor Concerns (ASC)
Time Frame: Change from baseline ASC score at 4 and 8 weeks
|
The scale was developed in 2007 to evaluate the fear of recurrence of cancer and general health in cancer patients.
The scale has two subscales: "cancer worry subscale" and "general health worry subscale".
The scale included six items and three in each subscale.
However, as the sixth item was 'children's health worry"' which cannot be administered to those who have no children, the scale was revised, and this item was removed.
The number of items was reduced to five.
The new 5-item form of the scale is recommended.
According to the revised scale, the "cancer worry subscale" is comprised of three items and the "general health scale" two items.
The Assessment of Survivor Concerns Scale is a 4-point Likert type scale that is evaluated as "not at all" and "very much".
The lowest score possible on this scale is five and the highest is 20.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of concern.
|
Change from baseline ASC score at 4 and 8 weeks
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The ECOG Scale of Performance Status describes a patient's level of functioning in terms of their ability to care for themself, daily activity, and physical ability (walking, working, etc.).
This numbering scale is one way to define the population of patients to be studied in the trial.
The scale was developed by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), now part of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, and published in 1982.
It is used to promote greater standardization among researchers who design and evaluate clinical cancer studies and to assess the general well-being of patients.
A score between 0 and 5 is made.
|
Baseline
|
|
Mobile Application Evaluation Form
Time Frame: At the end of the 4-week pilot application
|
It is a form created by researchers to evaluate satisfaction with the use of the mobile application.
With this form, after the "pilot application" from patients will receive feedback on the ease of use and content of the mobile application.
|
At the end of the 4-week pilot application
|
|
Introductory Information Form
Time Frame: Baseline
|
It is the form that contains information about the socio-demographic characteristics of the patients diagnosed with gynecological cancer and the type, duration and stage of the diagnosed gynecological cancer, the treatments received and the number of chemotherapy cycles.
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 60116787-020/34123
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gynecologic Cancer
-
University of LouisvilleJames Graham Brown Cancer CenterCompleted
-
Shandong UniversityCompletedGynecologic Cancer | Gynecologic DiseaseChina
-
Washington University School of MedicineWashington University Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesTerminatedStage III Gynecologic Cancer | Stage IV Gynecologic CancerUnited States
-
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali...CompletedGynecologic Cancer | Surgery | Anesthesia | Hysterectomy | Gynecologic DiseaseItaly
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalNot yet recruitingGynecologic Cancer
-
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di PaviaRecruiting
-
Fudan UniversityGuangzhou Burning Rock Dx Co., Ltd.Recruiting
-
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineCompleted
-
Institute of Oncology LjubljanaCompletedGynecologic CancerSlovenia
-
University Hospital TuebingenCompletedGynecologic CancerGermany
Clinical Trials on A mobile application intervention developed for gynecological cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
-
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SwedenKarolinska University Hospital; Skane University Hospital; Karlstad Central Hospital and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingIntermittent ClaudicationSweden
-
Western Regional Medical CenterUnknownEsophageal CancerUnited States
-
Turku University HospitalTurku AMK Master SchoolCompleted
-
Cheng-Hsin General HospitalRecruitingBreast NeoplasmsTaiwan
-
Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiCompletedAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderGreece
-
Federal University of MaranhaoActive, not recruitingBreast Cancer | Breast - Female | Breast Cancer FemalesBrazil
-
Pakistan Institute of Living and LearningNot yet recruiting
-
Sanko UniversityUniversity of GaziantepCompletedBreast CancerTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Yanfei JinNot yet recruitingCancer | Sexual Dysfunction, Psychological | Relationship Distress
-
Dena h. Al-TameemiBaghdad Medical CityNot yet recruitingBreast Cancer | Breast Neoplasm | Medication Adherence | Symptom Management | Chemotherapy-Related Toxicities | Quality of Life in Cancer Patients | Accuracy of AI AppIraq