Clinical Trial Comparing Dose-intensified SBRT With Conventional Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases (DOSIS RCT)

May 15, 2023 updated by: University of Zurich

Dose-intensified Image-guided Fractionated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Painful Spinal Metastases Versus Conventional Radiation Therapy: a Randomised Controlled Trial (DOSIS RCT)

This study will compare pain (primary end-point) and local metastatic tumor control (secondary end-point) after dose-intensified image-guided fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for painful mass-type spinal metastases versus conventional radiation therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Radiation therapy is an effective palliative treatment for painful spinal metastases. A sub-group of patients with mass-type spinal metastases, a factor associated with poor local metastasis control, require treatment optimization ensuring durable pain control and metastatic tumor control.

Proposed solution: To intensify (escalate) radiation dose using simultaneous integrated boost with image-guided hypofractionated SBRT for painful mass-type spinal metastases in a randomized controlled trial. Two experimental fractionation regimes will be tested in the study depending on presence or absence of epidural involvement. Dose intensification is expected to achieve long-term pain control and long-term palliation as well as long-term local metastatic tumor control without adding toxicity as compared to conventional fractionation regimes with conventional radiation therapy.

The study will be carried out as multinational, multicentre phase II clinical controlled trial enrolling patients with painful mass-type spinal metastases who are eligible for radiation therapy without surgery. This study additionally includes a prospective observational arm for patients not eligible for randomisation who are treated in analogy to arm A of the randomised arm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

219

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Zürich, Switzerland, 8091
        • UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Klinik für Radio-Onkologie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Established histological diagnosis of a malignant primary or metastatic tumor;
  • Histologically, radiologically or scintigraphically proven spinal metastasis;
  • Pain in the affected spinal region or free of pain under pain medication;
  • Age ≥18 years old;
  • Karnofsky performance status ≥60%;
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Modified Bauer Score < 2;
  • No-mass-type metastatic lesion, defined as a 3D space-occupying lesion visible on CT and/or MR;
  • "Radiosensitive" histology of the primary tumor, e.g., lymphoma, small-cell lung cancer, multiple myeloma, germ cell tumors;
  • Progressive neurological symptoms/deficit;
  • More than 3 affected vertebrae in one target site;
  • More than 2 treatment sites;
  • Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) 13 - 18, i.e., unstable;
  • Unable to tolerate treatment (unable to lie flat and immobilized);
  • Previous radiotherapy of the region at the level of the affected vertebrae;
  • Previous radionuclide therapy within 30 days before stereotactic body radiation therapy;
  • Previous surgery (stabilization) of the affected vertebrae;
  • Contraindications for MR scanning, e.g., pacemakers;
  • Patients with allergy to contrast agents used in computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging or patients who cannot be premedicated to use contrast agent;
  • Pregnant or lactating women;
  • Women of child bearing potential or sexually active males not willing to use effective contraception while on treatment and 3 months after the end of treatment;
  • Mental conditions rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study;
  • Patient unlikely to comply with protocol, i.e. uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, and unlikely to complete the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SBRT (Arm A)

dose-intensified image-guided SBRT using simultaneous integrated boost:

  • in the case of no epidural involvement: 40 Gy and 20 Gy in 5 fractions to the high-dose and conventional-dose target volume, respectively.
  • In the case epidural involvement: 48.5 Gy and 30 Gy in 10 fractions to the high-dose and conventional-dose target volume, respectively.
Active Comparator: Conventional Radiation Therapy (Arm B)

External 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT):

Homogeneous irradiation of the affected vertebra delivering either

  • 20 Gy in 5 fractions or
  • 30 Gy in 10 fractions.
Experimental: SBRT (prospective observational)
Patients eligible for the prospective observational arm will be treated according to the investigational arm (arm A) of the randomised arm of the trial.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain response - improvement by ≥ 2 points on the pain Visual Analogue Scale at 6 months post-treatment at the treatment site
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Local metastasis control
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Local metastasis control is defined from the day of randomization to a day of local (at the site of the treated spinal metastasis) progression, i.e. local failure, determined on control MR images as a change in signal intensity or on CT images as increasing soft-tissue mass. Increased epidural disease or enlargement of paraspinal disease on control images will be documented as progression.
up to 2 years
Overall survival
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Overall survival is defined from the day of randomization to a day of death of any cause.
up to 2 years
Cancer-specific survival
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Cancer-specific survival is defined from the day of randomization to a day of death due to cancer progression.
up to 2 years
Quality-of-life (QoL)
Time Frame: Day 1 and last day of treatment (usually day5 if Radiotherapy is delivered in 5 fractions, and day 12 if Radiotherapy is delivered in 10 fractions); months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
Quality-of-life (QoL) as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C15-PL, EORTC-BM22 and EQ-5D-5L patient reported questionnaires
Day 1 and last day of treatment (usually day5 if Radiotherapy is delivered in 5 fractions, and day 12 if Radiotherapy is delivered in 10 fractions); months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24
Epidural spinal cord compression
Time Frame: up to 2 years
Epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) will be scored using Bilsky criteria.
up to 2 years
Acute and late toxicity
Time Frame: Acute toxicity: up to 3 months; late toxicity: from 3 months up to 24 months
Acute aund late toxicity will be assessed in accordance to NCI CTCEA version 4.03 criteria.
Acute toxicity: up to 3 months; late toxicity: from 3 months up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthias Guckenberger, Prof. Dr., Universitatsspital Zurich

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 8, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 13, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DOSIS RCT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Metastasis

Clinical Trials on dose-intensified image-guided SBRT using simultaneous integrated boost

3
Subscribe