Impact of Local Anesthetic Wound Infiltration on Postoperative Pain Following Cesarean Delivery

February 21, 2020 updated by: Duke University
The purpose of this study is to determine if the infusion of the local anesthetic ropivacaine (a numbing medicine) and the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ketorolac (a pain killer similar to ibuprofen) through a catheter placed along the cesarean delivery incision, will reduce the pain experienced after cesarean section and need for narcotic pain medicine.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class 1,2, and 3
  • English speaking women at a gestational age > 37 weeks
  • scheduled for cesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal epidural anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BMI > 50 kg/m2
  • history of intravenous drug or opioid abuse
  • previous history of chronic pain syndrome
  • history of opioid use in the past week
  • allergy or contraindication to any of the study medications
  • non-English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ropivacaine
Subjects will receive 440 mg ropivacaine and 30 mg ketorolac. Infusion of study medication will start after the skin is sutured and will continue for 48 hours after cesarean delivery.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Subjects will receive saline placebo. Infusion of study medication will start after the skin is sutured and will continue for 48 hours after cesarean delivery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Score on Movement (Sitting in Bed From a Supine Position)
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable
24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Scores at Rest
Time Frame: 2 hours
Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable
2 hours
Pain Scores at Rest
Time Frame: 24 hours
Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable
24 hours
Pain Scores at Rest
Time Frame: 48 hours
Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable
48 hours
Opioid Consumption
Time Frame: 2 hours
measured in mg oxycodone equivalents
2 hours
Opioid Consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours
measured in mg oxycodone equivalents
24 hours
Opioid Consumption
Time Frame: 48 hours
measured in mg oxycodone equivalents
48 hours
Time to First Rescue Analgesic
Time Frame: 48 hours
48 hours
Number of Subjects Experiencing Nausea
Time Frame: 2 hours
Asking patients whether or not they experienced the symptom in the preceding time-frame
2 hours
Number of Subjects Experiencing Nausea
Time Frame: 24 hours
Asking patients whether or not they experienced the symptom in the preceding time-frame
24 hours
Number of Subjects Experiencing Nausea
Time Frame: 48 hours
Asking patients whether or not they experienced the symptom in the preceding time-frame
48 hours
Number of Subjects Experiencing Vomiting
Time Frame: 2 hours
Asking patients whether or not they experienced the symptom in the preceding time-frame
2 hours
Number of Subjects Experiencing Vomiting
Time Frame: 24 hours
Asking patients whether or not they experienced the symptom in the preceding time-frame
24 hours
Number of Subjects Experiencing Vomiting
Time Frame: 48 hours
Asking patients whether or not they experienced the symptom in the preceding time-frame
48 hours
Number of Subjects Experiencing Pruritus
Time Frame: 2 hours
Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable
2 hours
Number of Subjects Experiencing Pruritus
Time Frame: 24 hours
Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable
24 hours
Number of Subjects Experiencing Pruritus
Time Frame: 48 hours
Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable
48 hours
Patient Satisfaction With Postoperative Analgesia on a 0-10 Scale
Time Frame: 48 hours
Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being not at all satisfied and 10 being completely satisfied
48 hours
Number of Subjects With Chronic Pain
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Phone interview asking patient about presence of pain at incision site
8 weeks
Number of Subjects With Chronic Pain
Time Frame: 6 months
Phone interview asking patient about presence of pain at incision site
6 months
Postpartum Depression, as Measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Patients contacted over the phone completed screening with the EPDS, on a scale of 0-30. A score of over 13 indicate risk for postpartum depression
8 weeks
Postpartum Depression, as Measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
Patients contacted over the phone completed screening with the EPDS, on a scale of 0-30. A score of over 13 indicate risk for postpartum depression
6 months
Pain Score on Movement
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
Score reported on a scale of 0-10, with 0 being none and 10 being the worst imaginable
48 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ashraf Habib, MD, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe