Clinical Study of Stent Versus Direct Atherectomy Versus Angioplasty to Treat Lower Limb In-stent Restenosis

December 2, 2019 updated by: Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
This is a randomized study comparing Stent Versus Direct Atherectomy Versus Angioplasty to Treat Lower Limb In-stent Restenosis (superficial femoral or popliteal artery).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized study comparing Stent Versus Direct Atherectomy Versus Angioplasty to Treat Lower Limb In-stent Restenosis (superficial femoral or popliteal artery).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100053
        • Recruiting
        • Gu Yong Quan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Provides written informed consent Willing to comply with follow-up evaluations at specified times Has claudication or rest pain due to peripheral arterial In-stent restenosis Disease located within the femoropopliteal artery Patient has a In-stent restenosis lesion(s) with >50% stenosis documented angiographically Patient has symptoms of peripheral arterial disease classified as Rutherford Category 2 or greater.

Exclusion Criteria:

They were excluded if they had one or more of the following: 1. Acute or subacute lower limb ischemia; 2. Severe calcification lesions; 3. Total occlusions lesions more significant than 10 cm or total occlusion lesions with a suspicion of subintimal wire recanalization 4. untreated ipsilateral iliac artery stenosis>70%, or the distal runoff artery <1 root; 5. Previously lower extremity intervention or surgical graft artery bypass; 6. Severe renal insufficiency, creatinine level greater than 2.5 mg/dL; 7. The patient's platelet count is less than 100,000/uL, antiplatelet or anticoagulant contraindications to required medications; 8. Patients with immune system diseases or malignant tumours; 9. ongoing active infection 10. decompensated congestive heart failure or acute coronary syndrome; 11. Unwillingness to return for future follow-up visits

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intervention: Stents
Stents group
Active Comparator: Intervention: Atherectomy
Direct Atherectomy group
Active Comparator: Intervention: Balloon
Balloon group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Patency Rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Primary patency is defined as no significant reduction of flow detectable by Duplex ultrasound through the index lesion and no further clinically driven target vessel revascularization performed in the interim. Significant reduction of flow is binary restenosis defined as the diameter stenosis >50% with a peak systolic velocity ratio >2.4 as measured by Duplex ultrasound.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical success
Time Frame: 1 day
Technical success is defined as residual stenosis less than 30% by final angiography and/or a flow-limiting dissection.
1 day
freedom from clinically-driven TLR
Time Frame: 12 months
it is defined as freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization
12 months
Limb Salvage Rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Limb Salvage is defined as the freedom from secondary major amputation
12 months
Major Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months
Major adverse events included death, index limb ischemia, index limb amputation, clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and significant embolic events, which were defined as causing end-organ damage.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atherosclerosis

Clinical Trials on plaque excision system

Subscribe