Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Azathioprine in Treatment Naive Autoimmune Hepatitis (CAMARO)

June 18, 2023 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

A Randomised, Open-label Clinical Trial Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Azathioprine for Induction of Remission in Treatment Naive Autoimmune Hepatitis

Rationale: Current standard therapy of autoimmune hepatitis consists of a combination of prednisolone and azathioprine. However, a significant proportion of patients does not respond to, or is intolerant for, azathioprine. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has surpassed azathioprine as therapy to prevent organ transplant rejection and is sometimes used as an alternative option for autoimmune hepatitis. Several case series and one prospective study have documented the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil as induction therapy for autoimmune hepatitis. Robust evidence from a formal randomized clinical trial is lacking.

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil as induction therapy in patients with treatment naive autoimmune hepatitis.

Study design: Multicenter, randomised, open-label intervention study Study population: Patients with newly diagnosed autoimmune hepatitis who are in need of induction therapy according to current guidelines.

Intervention: The intervention group will receive oral mycophenolate mofetil for 24 weeks. The control group will be treated with azathioprine for 24 weeks. Both groups will be treated with steroid induction which will closely follow the schedule from the recent Clinical Practice Guidelines by the European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL).

Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is the proportion of patients in biochemical remission, defined as normalization of serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels after 24 weeks of treatment, per treatment group. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability of mycophenolate mofetil, time to remission, changes in Model For End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) -score (and its components bilirubin, INR, creatinine), albumin, pseudocholinesterase and N-terminal procollagen-III-peptide, ELF (Enhanced Liver Fibrosis) -score and aspects of quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Antwerpen, Belgium
        • University Hospital Antwerpen
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081 HV
        • Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
      • Arnhem, Netherlands
        • Rijnstate Ziekenhuis
      • Den Bosch, Netherlands
        • Jeroen Bosch ziekenhuis
      • Enschede, Netherlands
        • Medisch Spectrum Twente
      • Groningen, Netherlands
        • University Medical Center Groningen
      • Leiden, Netherlands, 2333ZA
        • Leiden University Medical Centre
      • Maastricht, Netherlands
        • Maastricht UMC+
      • Nieuwegein, Netherlands, 3430 EM
        • Sint Antonius Hospital
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6525GA
        • Radboud University Medical Centre
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Erasmus MC
      • Uden, Netherlands
        • Bernhoven
    • Limburg
      • Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands, 6419 PC
        • Zuyderland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Probable or definite diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis according to the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Study Group criteria
  • First presentation of AIH requiring treatment according to the current EASL guidelines
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Must provide informed consent and agree to comply with the trial protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Overlap syndrome with Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) or Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) (Paris criteria, strong positive Anti-Mitochondrial Antibodies (AMA), past liver biopsy or cholangiographic findings compatible with PBC or PSC).
  • Presentation with acute liver failure, defined as presence of hepatic encephalopathy and coagulopathy (INR > 1.5)
  • Current treatment with prednisone/prednisolone and/or immunosuppressive medication for an indication other than autoimmune hepatitis
  • Current systemic infection
  • Other clinically significant medical conditions that could interfere with the trial
  • If female of childbearing potential: known pregnancy, or unwilling to practice anticontraceptive measures.
  • History of noncompliance with medical regimens, or patients who are considered to be potentially unreliable or unable to participate
  • Mental instability or incompetence, such that the validity of informed consent or compliance with the trial is uncertain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mycophenolate mofetil
The intervention group will receive oral mycophenolate mofetil for 24 weeks. Both groups will be treated with steroid induction which will closely follow the schedule from the recent EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Active Comparator: Azathioprine
. The control group will be treated with azathioprine (standard of care) for 24 weeks. Both groups will be treated with steroid induction which will closely follow the schedule from the recent EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biochemical remission
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The percentage of patients in biochemical remission, defined as normalization of serum ALT and IgG levels after 24 weeks of treatment, per treatment group.
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to biochemical remission
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Biochemical remission at any time
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Complete biochemical response, defined as normalization of AST, ALT and IgG at 6 months after initiation of treatment
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Insufficient response, defined as lack of complete biochemical response determined at 6 months
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Non-response at 4 weeks: defined as <50% decrease of serum transaminases within 4 weeks after initiation of treatment
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks
Up to 4 weeks
Changes in MELD score (and its components bilirubin, international normalized ratio (INR), creatinine) and in albumin
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Changes in liver stiffness, measured by transient elastography
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
N-terminal procollagen-III-peptide, ELF score
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Changes in quality of life measured with SF-36
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Difference in side-effects, adverse events and serious adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
The level of ALT, AST, GGT in both groups
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Percentage of patients with biochemical remission
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Ratio of ALT to lowest ALT ever
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Extrahepatic AIH manifestations (e.g. arthralgia)
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Patient survival
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Fatigue index
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Pruritis VAS score
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks
Difference in cumulative corticosteroid dose between MMF and azathioprine
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Up to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joost PH Drenth, MD, PhD, Radboud University Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Bart van Hoek, MD, PhD, Leiden University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

September 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autoimmune Hepatitis

Clinical Trials on Mycophenolate mofetil

3
Subscribe