Implementation of Computer-Assisted Intraoperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy

March 9, 2017 updated by: Erasme University Hospital

Implementation of Computer-Assisted Intraoperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Before and After Study

The aim of this study is to compare the implementation of computer-assisted goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) to standard of care fluid therapy in major abdominal surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Fluid therapy is one of the main tools used in anesthesiology to maintain adequate hemodynamic stability. Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) based on cardiac output and/or dynamic parameters of fluid responsiveness (e.g. pulse pressure variation) has been shown to decrease post-operative complications. The main inconvenience of protocol based therapy is its technical complexity which requires considerable time, attention, and vigilance. GDFT assisted by a closed-loop system, when compared to manual GDFT, is associated with a longer preload independent state and could increase clinician adherence to protocol. To this day no study has compared closed-loop assisted GDFT to standard of care.

Goal:

This study compares the results of the study entitled "Crystalloids or Colloids for Goal directed Fluid Therapy With Closed-loop Assistance in Major Surgery" (NCT02312999) to a standard of care group (started retrospectively before the first included patient of the above study) where fluid therapy is based only on static variables (e.g. arterial pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure (CVP), and urine output.) These groups consisted of the same population undergoing the same types of surgery.

Hypothesis:

A protocolized approach using computer-assisted GDFT when compared to standard of care is associated with less fluid administration and less blood transfusions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

260

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, 1070
        • Erasme University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (over the age of 18) undergoing elective major abdominal surgery that is expected to take longer than 3 hours and requiring general anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 years of age
  • Patients not undergoing surgery, requiring anesthesia, or cardiac output monitoring
  • Patients with arrhythmia and/or atrial fibrillation
  • Patients who are allergic to HES (hydroxyethyl starch)
  • Patients with renal insufficiency (serum creatinine of >2 mg/ml) or hepatic dysfunction (liver enzymes >1.5)
  • Patients who has coagulation disorders (values higher than 1.5x normal values)
  • Patients without the capacity to give written informed consent or refusal of consent
  • Pregnancy at time of enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard of care
This group (started retrospectively before the first included patient of the closed-loop goal-directed fluid therapy group) consists of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery where fluid management is carried out based only on static variables (e.g. arterial pressure, heart rate, CVP, and urine output).
Patients receive fluid management based only on static variables (e.g. arterial pressure, heart rate, CVP, and urine output). This control group (started retrospectively before the first included patient of the closed-loop goal directed fluid therapy group) consists of the same population undergoing the same surgery as the closed-loop GDFT group.
Active Comparator: Computer-assisted GDFT

This group consists of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery where fluid management is carried out with a closed-loop (automated) system to deliver fluid by a goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) standardized protocol.

Confer: "Crystalloids or Colloids for Goal-directed Fluid Therapy With Closed-loop Assistance in Major Surgery" (NCT02312999)

Patients receive fluid therapy via a computer-assisted goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) prototype closed-loop (automated) system guided by a cardiac output monitor.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perioperative fluid administration
Time Frame: 24 hours
Fluid balance during perioperative period
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality rate
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Length of hospitalisation
Time Frame: Every day up to 90 days after hospitalization
Every day up to 90 days after hospitalization
Transfusion of blood products during hospitalization
Time Frame: Every day up to 90 days post surgery
In-hospital transfusion during hospitalization
Every day up to 90 days post surgery
Hypotension incidence during surgery
Time Frame: 24 hours
Incidence of hypotension (defined as total case time spent with 20% drop from baseline preoperative blood pressure)
24 hours
Need of vasopressor
Time Frame: 24 hours
Use of vasopressors during the perioperative period
24 hours
Renal function - urea level
Time Frame: Every day up to 90 days after hospitalization
Urea levels. Measured in a blood sample taken during hospitalization
Every day up to 90 days after hospitalization
Renal function - creatinine level
Time Frame: Every day up to 90 days after hospitalization
Creatinine levels. Measured in a blood sample taken during hospitalization
Every day up to 90 days after hospitalization
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: Every day up to 90 days after hospitalization
Major complications included cardiac (acute coronary syndrome/ arrhythmia), pulmonary (embolism/edema), gastrointestinal (bowel and surgical anastomotic leak/internal or external fistulas/peritoneal effusions), renal (renal failure requiring dialysis), infectious (peritonitis/ sepsis), coagulation (bleeding), wound dehiscence, stroke, reoperation, readmission, and death. Minor complications included unplanned ICU admission, pneumonia/pleural effusion, deep venous thrombosis, paralytic ileus progressive, renal insufficiency, infection (superficial wound infection/fever/urinary infection) and confusion/delirium.
Every day up to 90 days after hospitalization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe