Randomized Evaluation of BST-CarGel Versus Microfracture Alone On Recovery From Distal Femoral Cartilage Lesions (RECORD)

October 30, 2018 updated by: Piramal Healthcare Canada Ltd
This multi-centre randomized, controlled trial will assess the impact of BST-CarGel scaffold with microfracture versus microfracture alone on short and long term clinical benefit in patients with cartilage lesions of the femoral condyle requiring operative management.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The current standard of treatment for cartilage lesions on the femoral condyle is microfracture, which is conducted by penetrating the subchondral bone below the lesion. This procedure creates a natural healing response as a result of the bleeding and clotting caused by the microfracture, restoring the lesion. BST-CarGel (Piramal Life Sciences, Bio-Orthopaedic Division), a liquid chitosan-containing polymer scaffolding, has been developed as an intra-articular injectable scaffold to aid in the stabilization of the blood clot created by microfracture. BST-CarGel does not interfere with the normal clotting process; however, it enables a prolonged healing time due to the increased stabilization of the clot within the lesion and the inhibition of clot retraction.

The RECORD trial is a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial to assess the impact of the BST-CarGel scaffold and microfracture versus microfracture alone on short term clinical benefit as measured by loaded knee pain (single leg squat) on a visual analogue scale (3-6 months), mid-long term clinical benefit as measured by the same loaded knee pain (single leg squat) (9, 12, and 24 months) and Tegner Activity Score (TAS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis (KOOS) at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. Approximately 158 participants with full-thickness grade III and IV cartilage lesions will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive one of the two treatments during an arthroscopic procedure and will be followed for up to 24 months to collect outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Adelaide, Australia, 5000
        • Calvary Wakefield Hospital
      • Murdoch, Australia, 6150
        • Murdoch Orthopaedic Clinic
      • Banff, Canada, T1L1B3
        • Banff Sport Medicine
      • London, Canada, N6A3K7
        • Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic
      • Montreal, Canada, H1T4B3
        • Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
      • Lyon, France, 69004
        • Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse
      • Nancy, France, 54000
        • CHRU Nancy - Hospital Central
      • Regensburg, Germany, 93042
        • University Medical Centre Regensburg
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08023
        • Hospital Quironsalud Barcelona
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08003
        • Hospital Universitari del Mar
      • Zaragoza, Spain, 50009
        • Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8032
        • SportClinic Zurich / Hirslanden Clinic
      • Birmingham, United Kingdom, B312AP
        • The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital
      • Southampton, United Kingdom, S0166YD
        • University Hospital Southampton

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • requires cartilage repair treatment due to distal femoral cartilage lesion
  • is 18-55 years of age at the time of surgery
  • has single, focal cartilage lesion on one of the femoral condyles
  • has symptomatic cartilage lesion that has failed conservative management
  • has a single lesion classified as focal, full-thickness grade 3 or 4 according to the ICRS (3A, 3B, 3C, 3D and 4A)
  • an area of lesion between 1.5-3 cm2 after debridement
  • has a stable knee (<5-mm side-to-side difference on Lachman and varus and valgus stress testing and grade 0 or 1 on the pivot-shift test) and an intact meniscal rim
  • is willing and able to participate in required follow-up visits at the investigational site and to complete study procedures and questionnaires and recommended physiotherapy regimen
  • has agreed to discontinue the use of all knee pain medication 3 days before the pre-treatment visit and the post-treatment follow-up visits at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months
  • has consented to participating in the study by signing the IRB/EC approved informed consent form
  • no deep osteochondral defect ( < 5 mm bone loss)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • has multiple lesions or kissing (opposing) lesion(s) greater than GII
  • has clinically relevant compartment malalignment (>5°)
  • has bone cyst(s) associated with, or adjacent to, the index lesion
  • has Osteochondritis Dissecans with bone or bone-cartilage fragment in place
  • has had ligament treatments in the index knee within the previous 24 months
  • has had surgical cartilage treatments in the index knee within previous 12 months
  • has had intra-articular injections in the index knee within the previous 2 months
  • has diagnosis of an immunosuppressive disorder
  • has a BMI > 30 kg/m2
  • has concomitant healing bone fractures
  • has a single lesion classified as focal, full-thickness grade 4B as defined by ICRS
  • has noteworthy pain in the ipsilateral hip or ankle or contralateral hip, knee, or ankle
  • has inflammatory arthropathy
  • has blood clotting disorders, was receiving anticoagulant therapy, or has recurring deep vein thrombosis
  • has a serious heart condition or liver and/or renal abnormalities diagnosed within the previous 24 months
  • has chronic infection of the lower joint extremities
  • has a history of alcohol or drug abuse within the previous 12 months
  • is facing current or impending incarceration
  • has a known allergy to shellfish
  • is pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • in the opinion of the PI, has an emotional or neurological condition that would pre-empt their ability or willingness to participate in the study including mental illness, drug or alcohol abuse
  • chronic knee pain
  • has a documented medical history of vitamin-D deficiency that is not being managed with supplementation
  • is entered in another investigational drug, biologic, or device study or has been treated with an investigational product in the past 30 days
  • requires an open procedure
  • is known to be at risk for lost to follow-up, or failure to return for scheduled visits

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Microfracture treatment
Microfracture surgery of the femoral condyle
Microfracture is performed by penetrating the subchondral bone beneath the cartilage lesion inducing a bleeding response.
EXPERIMENTAL: BST-CarGel plus microfracture treatment
BST-CarGel combined with fresh, autologous whole blood and applied to the lesion on the femoral condyle with a syringe following an arthroscopic microfracture surgery.
Microfracture is performed by penetrating the subchondral bone beneath the cartilage lesion inducing a bleeding response.
BST-CarGel is combined with fresh, autologous whole blood and applied to the lesion on the femoral condyle with a syringe following microfracture arthroscopic surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in loaded knee pain (single leg squat) visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months post-surgery
Used to demonstrate patient clinical improvement. The VAS is one of the most commonly used measures of pain intensity, where the patient rates their pain on a scale from 0 to 10 (0=no pain; 10=maximum pain possible).
Baseline to 24 months post-surgery
Change in knee function measured by the TAS questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months post-surgery
The TAS is a validated patient-administered questionnaire for use in multiple knee injuries and consists of a numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10 to indicate the ability to perform specific activities.
Baseline to 24 months post-surgery
Change in knee function measured by the IKDC questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months post-surgery
The IKDC measures the progress in symptoms, function, and sports activities caused by knee impairment after a treatment has been performed. It can be used with reliability and validity in patients with a range of knee conditions.
Baseline to 24 months post-surgery
Change in knee function measured by the KOOS questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months post-surgery
The KOOS is a measure of a patient's perceived knee pain and function, as well as associated problems with their knee status. It contains 42 items that are all recorded on a five-point Likert Scale by the patient.
Baseline to 24 months post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Repair tissue quantity and quality
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post-surgery
Measured by MOCART Score and percentage lesion fill. The MOCART Score will be completed by two independent, blinded, well-trained radiologist readers.
Up to 24 months post-surgery
Adverse events related to treatment
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post-surgery
Up to 24 months post-surgery
Economic evaluation
Time Frame: surgical visit, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months,12 months and 24 months post-surgery
Measured by study-specific Resource Utilization Questionnaires which will be used to determine the costs associated with the use of the BST-CarGel scaffold treatment.
surgical visit, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months,12 months and 24 months post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jean-Pierre Desmarais, Piramal Healthcare Canada Ltd

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 26, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 6, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 6, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Lesion of Articular Cartilage of Knee

Clinical Trials on Microfracture treatment

3
Subscribe