Vaginal Misoprostol Before IUD Insertion in Women With Cesarean Scar

November 1, 2017 updated by: Ahmed Maged, Cairo University

Benefits of Use of 600 Microgram Misoprostol Vaginally Prior To Insertion Of An Intrauterine Device in Patients With Cesarean Scar: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Groups of study:

120 candidates for Cu T 380A IUD insertion were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group 1: Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion.

Group 2: Sixty women received the placebo vaginally. The placebo and misoprostol were put in 120 numbered closed envelopes according to the table of random numbers and an envelope was allocated to each patient accordingly.

Methodology:

All patients were subjected to the following:

(i) Complete history taking (ii) Proper counseling: (iv) Examination: (v) 600ug misoprostol (3tablets Misotac®, ( Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt )or placebo were administered Vaginally as deep as possible 6 hours before insertion of the IUD by gynecologist .

(vi) Insertion of IUD: (TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India ) After full history taken , Proper counseling, Informed consent is taken from each patients, examination ( general , abdominal and pelvic )to exclude any pathology .

A careful bimanual examination was done prior to IUD insertion. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution.

The Next step was to sound and measure the depth of the uterus. The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward to straighten the angle of flection.

The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange.

The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn a short distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus .

The inserter tube was then removed. Then strings were cut to project about 2-4 cm from the external cervical os.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Groups of study:

120 candidates for Cu T 380A IUD insertion were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups: Group 1: Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion.

Group 2: Sixty women received the placebo vaginally. The placebo and misoprostol were put in 120 numbered closed envelopes according to the table of random numbers and an envelope was allocated to each patient accordingly.

Methods of randomization:

To insure that everyone had an equal chance of participation, randomization was guided by table of random numbers using computer generated system(SPSS: windous version8) (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) double blinding technique was used thus; the investigator and the patient didn't know the group to which the patient was allocated.

Methodology:

All patients were subjected to the following:

(i) Complete history taking:

  • Full history taking.
  • Obstetric history.
  • Menstrual history.
  • Medical history. Data were collected in a special form for each patient. (ii) Proper counseling: Proper counseling of each patient about different types of IUDs, the advantage and side effects of each type, explanation of the menstrual pattern changes, assuring the patient that these changes are very common and that it will disappear after a period of time after insertion.

(iii) Consent: Informed consent is taken from each patients . (iv) Examination:

  1. General examination.
  2. Abdominal examination.
  3. Pelvic examination to exclude pelvic pathology .

    (v) 600ug misoprostol (3tablets Misotac®, ( Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt )or placebo ( stugeron®, Mina Pharm. under licence Janssen Pharmaceutica, Egypt ) were administered Vaginally as deep as possible 6 hours before insertion of the IUD by gynecologist .

    (vi) Insertion of IUD: (TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India ) After full history taken , Proper counseling, Informed consent is taken from each patients, examination ( general , abdominal and pelvic )to exclude any pathology .

    A careful bimanual examination was done prior to IUD insertion. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution.

    The Next step was to sound and measure the depth of the uterus. The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward to straighten the angle of flection.

    The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange.

    The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn ashort distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus .

    The inserter tube was then removed. Then strings were cut to project about 2-4 cm from the external cervical os.

    Post insertion instructions:

    Palpation of strings should be performed monthly by the patient to verify continuing presence of the IUD after each menstrual flow. Caution the patient that the first 2 menses are typically heavier.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 12151
        • Kasr Alainy Medical School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women with previous cesarean section and with no previous vaginal delivery attending outpatient clinic for IUD insertion

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. contraindications for misoprostol use (pregnancy and prostaglandin allergy).
  2. contraindications for IUD use (gynecologic malignancy, pelvic inflammatory disease and unexplained vaginal bleeding).
  3. previous vaginal delivery. And (4) medical disorders as diabetes, hypertension and bleeding tendency .

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Misoprostol group
Sixty women received 600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion.
600 micrograms of misoprostol vaginally as deep as possible six hours before IUD insertion
Other Names:
  • cytotec

bimanual examination. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution.

The Next step was to sound The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange.

The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn ashort distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus .

Other Names:
  • TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India
Placebo Comparator: placebo group
Sixty women received the placebo vaginally six hours before IUD insertion. Placebo is the same in size, color and shape to misoprostol.

bimanual examination. The cervix was exposed by introducing a vaginal speculum, the cervix and vaginal vault were cleaned with povidone- iodine solution.

The Next step was to sound The IUD was folded into the insertion tube immediately prior to insertion. The cervix was grasped with a tenaculum, and gently pulled downward The insertion tube was advanced into the uterus to the correct depth as marked on the tube by a sliding plastic flange.

The outer sheath of the insert was withdrawn ashort distance to release the arms of the T and was then gently pushed inward again to elevate the opened T against the fundus of uterus .

Other Names:
  • TCu-380A®,Pregna International Ltd, India

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score
Time Frame: At time of insertion
Pain scores were measured by Visual analogue scale (VAS) consists of 10 cm horizontal straight line with 2 ends At 0 end there was no pain and at 10 there was a severe pain
At time of insertion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difficulty of insertion of IUD in both groups
Time Frame: At time of insertion
Difficulty of IUD insertion was measured by a 10-point scale, on which 0 represented an extremely easy, and 10 an extremely difficult insertion
At time of insertion
side effects
Time Frame: from time of administration till insertion
abdominal cramps, headache, nausea, diarrhea and fever
from time of administration till insertion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ahmed Maged, Kasr Alainy Medical School

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 11, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Contraceptive Device; Complications

Clinical Trials on Misoprostol

Subscribe