Evaluation of a Simple Clinical Test to Detect the Risk of Falling in Patients With BPCO and Research for Predictive Factors of Fall Risk. (Equil-BPCO)

August 12, 2019 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Evaluation of a Simple Clinical Test to Detect the Risk of Falling in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Research for Predictive Factors of Fall Risk.

The risk of falling in increased in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. To date, a screening test (the Berg Balance scale, BBS) is used to evaluate this risk but it spends 20 to 30 minutes to complete.

The aim of our study is to evaluate the sensitivity of a more straightforward test (Timed Up and Go, TUG)) to assess the fall risk. The TUG is routinely used in elderly to screen for frailty.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

We will recruit COPD patients in stable condition (free of exacerbation of the disease for a month), 40 without chronic respiratory failure and 40 with home oxygen therapy.

The patients will be proposed to perform the following tests and to fill in questionnaires:

- Questionnaires: Elderly Falls Screening Test to quantify the falls in the last year, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale.

Tests:

  • Berg Balance Scale measuring balance in 14 different functional tasks (abnormal cut-off value <56)
  • Timed Up and Go evaluating the time to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down (abnormal cut-off value >12 seconds).
  • 6 minute walk test evaluating endurance to submaximal exercise.
  • Isokinetic maximal force of the quadriceps at 60°/s
  • Balance control: posturography consisting in measuring variations when standing on a force platform.
  • Body composition assessment through Dual Xray Absorptiometry (DXA), to measure body muscle mass and more specifically appendicular muscle mass index as a criteria of sarcopenia, and bone mineral density.
  • Blood analysis: a blood sample will be withdrawn to measure calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D, albumin transthyretin, cell count, C reactive protein.

Analysis of the results:

We will calculate the sensitivity of the TUG test (abnormal test) to detect fall risk as assessed by an abnormal BBS score.

Moreover, in fallers, we will search for predictive factors. More specifically, we will look for the role of a decreased quadriceps force, a reduced muscle mass, a poor tolerance of exercise, the presence of hypoxia (severity of the disease).

Perspectives:

When validated as a screening test for the risk of falling in COPD patients, the TUG test could be used routinely by physiotherapists as a more simple and faster test and will enable to prevent falls through initiation of a balance control training program.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Auvergne
      • Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne, France, 63003
        • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

We will recruit COPD patients in stable condition (free of exacerbation of the disease for a month), 40 without chronic respiratory failure and 40 with home oxygen therapy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • COPD confirmed by pulmonary function tests
  • Long term oxygen therapy since at least 3 months in the LOT+ subgroup

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exacerbation of COPD necessitating an hospitalization or an oral corticosteroid treatment, in the last 4 weeks
  • Pulmonary rehabilitation in the last 3 months
  • Any neurological disease affecting balance control.
  • Inability to perform a walk test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
COPD patients without chronic respiratory failure

We will recruit COPD patients in stable condition (free of exacerbation of the disease for a month), 40 without chronic respiratory failure and 40 with home oxygen therapy.

The patients will be proposed to perform the following tests and to fill in questionnaires

It's a functional test evaluating the time to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down (abnormal cut-off value >12 seconds).
COPD patients with home oxygen therapy

We will recruit COPD patients in stable condition (free of exacerbation of the disease for a month), 40 without chronic respiratory failure and 40 with home oxygen therapy.

The patients will be proposed to perform the following tests and to fill in questionnaires

It's a functional test evaluating the time to rise from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down (abnormal cut-off value >12 seconds).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the Timed Up and Go test and the Berg Balance scale
Time Frame: at day 1
Comparison of the consistency of abnormal value of the Timed Up and Go test and the Berg Balance scale
at day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of the TUG test and the BBS
Time Frame: at day 1
to detect fall as assessed by the Elderly Falls Screening Test.
at day 1
Difference in BBS score
Time Frame: at day 1
between COPD patients without and with chronic respiratory failure (LOT+/- subgroups).
at day 1
Identify predictive factors of fall risk
Time Frame: at day 1
walk distance, quadriceps force, muscle mass, balance control.
at day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 27, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 27, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHU-332
  • 2016-A01188-43 (Other Identifier: 2016-A01188-43)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COPD Diagnosed

Clinical Trials on Timed Up and Go

3
Subscribe