Prevalence and Impact on Quality of Life of Airway Disease in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

July 9, 2017 updated by: Sun Mi Choi, Seoul National University Hospital
The investigators assess the prevalence of airway disease associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Korea, and evaluate the effect of these airway diseases on the symptoms and quality of life of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is defined as a specific form of chronic, progressive fibrosing interstitial pneumonia of unknown cause, occurring primarily in older adults, and limited to the lungs. It is characterized by progressive worsening of dyspnea and lung function and is associated with a poor prognosis.

The main symptoms of patients with IPF are dyspnea on exertion and a persistent dry cough or mildly productive cough.

In many IPF patients, cough is often the first symptom, preceding dyspnea on exertion sometimes by years. It affects upwards of 70-85% of patients with IPF.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (prevalence rate 4-18%) and asthma (prevalence rate 5.9-9.9%) are the airway disease whose main symptoms are also dyspnea and cough.

To date, the effect of airway disease has not been well studied in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and the prevalence is unknown in Korea.

Unlike idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, airway disease is a treatable, modifiable disease, so treatment of these diseases may improve QOL in IPF patients.

Therefore, this study's purpose is A. Identify the prevalence of airway disease in IPF patients B. Identify differences in QOL and symptoms according to presence of airway disease C. Identify the symptomatic improvement after active treatment for the airway diseases

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

ILD registry(Seoul National University IRB, IRB No. 1312-048-542), outpatient department, ward

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • IPF patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients on systemic steroid
  • Patients with acute exacerbation within the last 6 months
  • PFT+BDR, MBPT contra-indication
  • SpO2 < 90%

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants who have asthma combined with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Confirmation of asthma : pulmonary function test with bronchodilator response or Methacholine provocation test
Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Number of participants who have COPD combined with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Confirmation of COPD : pulmonary function test with bronchodilator response
Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Number of participants who have Eosinophilic bronchitis combined with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 year
Confirmation of Eosinophilic bronchitis : pulmonary function test with bronchodilator response, induced sputum
Through study completion, an average of 2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference of CAT scores between patients with airway disease and those without airway disease.
Time Frame: baseline and after treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Quality of life : COPD assessment test(CAT)
baseline and after treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
The difference of SGRQ scores to assess quality of life between patients with airway disease and those without airway disease.
Time Frame: baseline and after treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Quality of life : St George's Respiratory Questionnaire(SGRQ)
baseline and after treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
The difference of mMRC scores to assess symptom severity between patients with airway disease and those without airway disease.
Time Frame: baseline and after treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Symptom severity : mMRC
baseline and after treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
The difference of distance of 6MWT to assess symptom severity between patients with airway disease and those without airway disease.
Time Frame: baseline and after treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Symptom severity : 6 minute walking test(6MWT)
baseline and after treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
The difference of EQ-5D-VAS scores to assess symptom severity between patients with airway disease and those without airway disease.
Time Frame: baseline and after treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Symptom severity : EQ-5D-VAS
baseline and after treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
The difference of CQLQ scores to assess symptom severity between patients with airway disease and those without airway disease.
Time Frame: baseline and after treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Symptom severity : Cough Quality-of-Life Questionnaire(CQLQ)
baseline and after treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Checking the improvement of CAT score to assess the quality of life between patients with airway disease and those without airway disease
Time Frame: After treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Quality of life : COPD assessment test(CAT)
After treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Checking the improvement of SGRQ score to assess the quality of life between patients with airway disease and those without airway disease
Time Frame: After treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Quality of life : St George's Respiratory Questionnaire(SGRQ)
After treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Checking the improvement of mMRC scores to assess symptom severity between patients with airway disease and those without airway disease
Time Frame: After treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Symptom severity : mMRC
After treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Checking the improvement of distance of 6MWT to assess symptom severity between patients with airway disease and those without airway disease
Time Frame: After treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Symptom severity : 6 minute walking test(6MWT)
After treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Checking the improvement of EQ-5D-VAS score to assess symptom severity between patients with airway disease and those without airway disease
Time Frame: After treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Symptom severity : EQ-5D-VAS
After treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Checking the improvement of CQLQ to assess symptom severity between patients with airway disease and those without airway disease
Time Frame: After treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks
Symptom severity : Cough Quality-of-Life Questionnaire(CQLQ)
After treating the airway disease for 6~8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Choi Sun Mi, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and Lung institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Clinical Trials on Confirmation of Airway Disease combined with IPF

3
Subscribe