Characteristics and Mechanism of Denosumab-treated Giant Cell Tumor of Bone (D-Gct)

August 23, 2017 updated by: Hebei Medical University Third Hospital

Clinical, Pathologic Characteristics and Its Mechansim of Denosumab Treated Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTb) is a primary, osteolytic, benign tumor of the bone. Surgery is the commonly used treatment. Discovery of RANKL and its human monoclonal antibody, denosumab, led to use of denosumab for treatment of GCT. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and pathological results of treatment of relapsed or refractoriness GCT with denosumab and to assess adverse effect profile and recurrence rate.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTb) is an aggressive, benign bone tumor. GCTb, which was first defined by Cooper and Travers, can produce pulmonary metastasis, albeit rarely (1-6%). GCTb constitutes 5% of primary bone tumors and 20% of benign bone tumors. Histologically, the tumour consists of a proliferation of mononuclear cells, accompanied by a population of non-neoplastic osteoclast-like giant cells and mononuclear osteoclast precursors. Currently, it is thought that proliferating neoplastic cells produce a number of cytokines and mediators, including the receptor activator of nuclear factor κ-B-ligand (RANK-RANKL) system, that recruit osteoclast precursors and induce their maturation into multinucleated osteoclast. The standard management of GCTb is based on surgery with several local adjuvant treatments like methacrylate cement, phenol or cryotherapy to reduce the risk of recurrence, while bisphosphonates are used in some cases to decrease bone resorption and for pain relief in inoperable tumours or metastatic disease. In the last 5 years the use of denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody already licensed for postmenopausal osteoporosis and prevention of skeletal related events in bone metastases from solid tumours, has been introduced in the treatment strategy of GCTb. In this study we examined the clinical, radiological, histological and underlying mechanism features of a series of GCTb, before and after denosumab administration, comparing baseline and resection specimens. Moreover, we examined the safety of the drug and on the angiogenesis through the determination of microvascular density (MVD).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Zhuang Zhou, Ph.D
  • Phone Number: +86 18833130669
  • Email: 39094572@qq.com

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Guochuan Zhang, M.D.
  • Phone Number: +86 13932110889

Study Locations

    • Hebei
      • Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China, 050000
        • Recruiting
        • Zhuang Zhou
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Guochuan Zhang, M.D.
          • Phone Number: +86 13932110889

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Giant cell tumor of bone patients confirmed by clinical, medical imaging and Pathology.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) less than 14 patients; 2) pregnant patients; 3) A patient who receives other medications during treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pre-Denosumab GctB
Specimens obtained during biopsy
Denosumab (trade names Prolia and Xgeva) is a human monoclonal antibody for the treatment of osteoporosis, treatment-induced bone loss, metastases to bone, and giant cell tumor of bone.Denosumab is a RANKL inhibitor, which works by preventing the development of osteoclasts which are cells that break down bone.
Other Names:
  • Xgeva or Prolia
Experimental: Post-Denosumab GctB
Specimen after administration of Denosumab
Denosumab (trade names Prolia and Xgeva) is a human monoclonal antibody for the treatment of osteoporosis, treatment-induced bone loss, metastases to bone, and giant cell tumor of bone.Denosumab is a RANKL inhibitor, which works by preventing the development of osteoclasts which are cells that break down bone.
Other Names:
  • Xgeva or Prolia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Molecular analysis (Immunohistochemistry for RANKL, RANK, OPG,Col-I, VEGF)
Time Frame: 6 month

For collagen RANKL (Receptor Activator for Nuclear Factor-κ B Ligand), RANK (Receptor Activator for Nuclear Factor-κ B), OPG (Osteoprotegerin), Col-I (type I Collagen), VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) immunohistochemistry, sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and immunostained with a SA1024 SABC-POD kit and Kit-0017 DAB detection kit. Briefly, antigen retrieval was performed, and endogenous peroxidases were then inactivated prior to incubation with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. This was followed by incubation with a biotinylated secondary antibody and a streptavidin-biotin complex peroxidase solution. Diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromogen was applied and counterstained with hematoxylin for antibody detection.

Images were captured by a microscope system at 400-magnification. The integrated optical density values of each factor were semiquantitatively analyzed using Imaging Pro Plus 6.0 software.

6 month
Molecular analysis (RT-PCR for RANKL, RANK, OPG,Col-I, VEGF)
Time Frame: 6 month
Tissures mRNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The RNA concentration and quality were assessed using a Quawell Q5000 spectrophotometer (Quawell, San Jose, CA). Reverse transcription PCR was performed using a Gene Amp 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and custom-designed, validated primers for Col1α1, Col2α1, Aggrecan, MMP-13, and ADAMTS-4. GAPDH was used as the housekeeping gene. Relative gene expression changes were reported using the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method as previously described. The experiment was repeated in triplicate to ensure accuracy.
6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Score - Pain evaluation
Time Frame: 6 months
Visual analog scale [VAS] is a measure of pain intensity. It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (called horizontal visual analogue scale) or,vertical called vertical visual analog scale usually 10 cm or 100 mm length [both the gradations are used]. It is anchored by two verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme. For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 [on 100-mm scale]
6 months
Hematology test - Tartrate Resistant Acid Phosphatase
Time Frame: 6 months
Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, a bone resorption marker, is secreted from osteoclasts and this marker is reported to be high in patients with giant cell tumor of bone. We investigated the effects of denosumab and the usefulness of a tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase as a monitoring marker in the management of a refractory giant cell tumor of bone. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase secretion was measured in the patient's serum to monitor the response to denosumab, and a rapid normalization of the marker was observed after the first denosumab administration.
6 months
Follow-up for recrudescence
Time Frame: 6 month to 1 year

Patients were followed up regularly for local or systemic tumor recurrence by X-ray, CT, MRI, ECT.

The follow-up period was 3 months.

6 month to 1 year
Morphological change - HE (Hematoxylin-Eosin) staining
Time Frame: 6 month
For histological analysis of the adjacent intervertebral disc and fusion mass, the tissures of the Giant cell tumor of bone were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, decalcified in 10% EDTA-2Na for 3 months, and then embedded in paraffin. They were subsequently cut into 5-mm sections with cationic slides. Slides of the tissures of the Giant cell tumor of bone were stained with H&E and captured by a microscope system (BX53; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
6 month
Micro-vessel density or area by IHC - stained slides
Time Frame: 6 month
IHC - stained for VEGF images were used for microvessel density (MVD) and vascular bud relative area analysis. MVD was measured by counting the number of cartilage endplate vascular buds (an average of cephalic and caudal vascular buds). The ratio of vascular bud area to the total endplate area was measured for vascular bud relative area analysis using the grid method. MVD and vascular bud relative area analyses were repeated at least three times for enhanced accuracy
6 month
Imaging changes by X-ray, CT, MRI, ECT.
Time Frame: 6 month
The patients' clinical information, images from radiographs, CT and MRI before and after Denosumab-treatment were recorded and analyzed. Tumor volume was measured on coronal, transverse, and sagital MRI or CT scansof the lesion; and maximum height, width, and depth were recorded; and the volume was calculated using the formula of an ellopsoid mass volume = [(π/6) × height × width × depth]. If CT or MRI were not available, tumor volume was measured on two-plane radiograghs.
6 month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
Time Frame: 3 year
The CTCAE v.4 criteria was used to evaluate late toxicity for all patients. Toxicity scores were recalculated for patients treated before publication of CTCAE v4.0 scale.
3 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zhuang Zhou, Ph.D, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

We have not yet planned to to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Clinical Trials on Denosumab

3
Subscribe