Azacitidine and Pembrolizumab in Pancreatic Cancer

January 8, 2026 updated by: Susan E. Bates

Phase II Open-Label, Single-Center Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab Following Induction With the Hypomethylating Agent Azacitidine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer After Failure of First-Line Therapy

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of combining immune therapy, pembrolizumab, with a hypomethylating agent, azacitidine, for pancreatic cancer. People who have advanced pancreatic cancer with disease progression on first-line therapy are usually treated with a second chemotherapy regimen. However, there is no single accepted chemotherapy regimen and national guidelines recommend chemotherapy or clinical trial participation. In this study, all study subjects will receive a combination of immune therapy (every 3 weeks) and a hypomethylating agent (every 4 weeks). To date, studies have shown that combining a hypomethylating agent with chemotherapy or immune therapy may benefit patients across different solid tumor types including pancreatic cancer. Preclinical data in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer demonstrates improvement in survival with the combination of a hypomethylating agent and immune therapy. However, the use of single agent hypomethylating agent or immune therapy has not been shown to be effective in patients with pancreatic cancer. The one exception, to date, is the use of immune therapy in those individuals with a particular genetic feature known as mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability. The combination of immune therapy and a hypomethylating agent has not been studied in human subjects and is not approved by the FDA for use in pancreatic cancer.

This is a non-randomized, single-center, open-label trial of pembrolizumab and azacitidine in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Approximately 31 individuals will be asked to participate in this study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) has the worst prognosis of any major malignancy in the United States and, unlike other common cancers, annual deaths from PDA are rising. Despite recent advances, cytotoxic chemotherapy for PDA has been disappointing. Even among the small subset of patients who are suitable for surgical resection at the time of diagnosis, complete resection is followed by recurrence in majority of patients without further systemic therapy. Thus all PDA patients require systemic chemotherapy and more effective regimens are urgently needed.

Combination chemotherapy is effective in controlling disease and prolonging survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Despite recent successful phase 3 studies in the first-line setting, there is no defined second-line treatment for patients who experience disease progression following first-line therapy. Consensus guidelines (such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines) recommend clinical trial participation in this setting.

The investigators' pre-clinical data suggests that decitabine treatment in the KPC model of pancreatic cancer leads to a significant up-regulation of interferon-related genes and a polarization of the infiltrating immune cells. Based on these results, the investigators have evaluated the effect of single agent decitabine or anti-PD1H (a homologue of PD1 with very similar function and expression pattern) compared to combination therapy (treatment with decitabine followed by PD1H blockade). The investigators' preliminary results showed minimal effect of either agent alone on tumor growth but marked decrease in tumor progression in the combination arm. These results form the foundation of this phase II study.

This study will treat patients with the combination of azacitidine and pembrolizumab. A direct comparison between azacitidine and decitabine in terms of efficacy within a controlled clinical trial has not been performed thus far. In randomized myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) trials, the remission rates were similar for azacitidine and decitabine but the overall survival in the experimental arm was significantly shorter in the decitabine trial compared to the azacitidine trial. A primary reason to utilize azacitidine in this setting is our desire to amply reduced dose therapy with the goal of maintaining subjects on therapy Low-dose azacitidine is being tested in phase I/II clinical trials for advanced solid tumors-mainly colorectal cancer, small-cell lung carcinomas, ovarian cancer, and breast cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be willing and able to provide written informed consent for the trial.
  • Age ≥18 years of age on day of signing informed consent.
  • Have confirmed diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
  • Have a predicted life expectancy of greater than 3 months.
  • Have measurable disease based on RECIST 1.1.
  • Have a performance status of 0 or 1 using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Scale within 3 days of first dose of study drug.
  • Have documented radiographic progression to or documented intolerance of first line systemic chemotherapy which included either gemcitabine or Fluorouracil (5-FU) based regimen (including capecitabine).
  • Subjects who have documented disease recurrence within 6 months of completing neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for limited disease will be eligible for study. Subjects who recur greater than 6 months after completing adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy will not be eligible unless they receive additional chemotherapy for advanced disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Is currently participating and receiving study therapy or has participated in a study of an investigational agent and received study therapy, or herbal/complementary oral or IV medicine within 2 weeks of the first dose of treatment.
  • Has received chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 14 days of first dose of study medication.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pembrolizumab
Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer will receive pembrolizumab with the hypomethylating agent azacitidine.
Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks until progression
Other Names:
  • Keytruda
50 mg/m2 subcutaneous daily for 5 days every 28 days
Other Names:
  • Vidaza

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 24 months
PFS is defined as the time from the first day of trial treatment to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 (At least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Note: the appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression)) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Throughout study duration, up to approx 80 months
ORR is defined as the percentage of the participants in the analysis population who have a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Responses are based on assessments per RECIST 1.1.
Throughout study duration, up to approx 80 months
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: Throughout study duration, up to approx 80 months
For subjects who demonstrate CR or PR, based on assessments per RECIST 1.1, DOR is defined as the time from first documented evidence of CR or PR until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Throughout study duration, up to approx 80 months
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: Throughout study duration, up to approx 80 months
DCR is defined as the percentage of participants who have achieved CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) based on assessments per RECIST 1.1.
Throughout study duration, up to approx 80 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susan E Bates, MD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 3, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreas Cancer

Clinical Trials on Pembrolizumab

Subscribe