Effectiveness of Different Incentive Models in Booster up the Second Follow up Response Rate

May 21, 2018 updated by: Dr. Wang Man-Ping, The University of Hong Kong
Aim to test the effectiveness of different incentive models for increasing the follow-up response rate in the current smoker subject.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

According to the Hong Kong Census and Statistic Department, 10.5% of the Hong Kong population who aged 15 years or above are daily smokers (Thematic Household Survey Report - Report No. 59, 2016). The smoking prevalence was estimated from a thematic household survey that has been conducted every 2 or 3 years. Another population-based survey related to tobacco control is the Tobacco Control Policy-related Survey conducted by the Hong Kong Council on Smoking and Health and the University of Hong Kong. Both surveys were in a cross-sectional design and no follow-up was done. A cohort study with follow-up data could provide more insights for the causal relationship. However, most people are not willing to complete follow-up survey and the response rate is often low (Mellahi, 2016). The low survey response rate could lead to statistically bias in the research funding (Pit, 2014). Therefore, cohort surveys need to provide attractive monetary incentive to the interviewee to increase the response rate (Pit, 2014).

This study aims to assess and compare the 3-month response rate of a follow-up survey due to different financial incentive schemes. The findings will be used for a feasibility assessment of future cohort studies of evaluating tobacco control measures and public opinion, and exploration of appropriate incentive scheme.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1246

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All Hong Kong residents

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 15 or above
  • Cantonese or Mandarin speakers

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to provide a consent form
  • Speak language other than Cantonese and Mandarin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Incentive schemes 1
No incentive will be given after completing the follow-up survey
Incentive schemes 2
Receiving $100 supermarket coupon after completing the follow-up survey
Incentive schemes 3
Receiving $200 supermarket coupon after completing the follow-up survey
Incentive schemes 4
Receiving $100 supermarket coupon before completing the follow-up survey and another $100 supermarket coupon after completing the follow-up survey

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of respondents who will complete the 3-month follow-up
Time Frame: Finish all telephone survey by Jan 2018
Proportion of respondents who will complete the 3-month follow-up
Finish all telephone survey by Jan 2018

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Man Ping Wang, PhD, Study Principal Investigator

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Incentive schemes 2017

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

3
Subscribe