Alcohol and Health: Personalized Feedback

October 29, 2019 updated by: Emma Brett, Oklahoma State University
Heavy episodic drinking (HED) among college students remains a concern within the U.S., as rates of HED are still high in this population. Though a variety of brief motivational interventions for alcohol use in college students have demonstrated significant effects, these effects are often small and not consistently maintained over time. Personalized feedback interventions (PFIs) are a particularly promising approach, as these are often acceptable to college students, as well as low-cost, and easy to disseminate. Though presentation of interperson discrepancy via descriptive and injunctive norms has shown consistent effects within PFIs and received much attention in the literature, intraperson, or ideal-actual self discrepancies, has largely been ignored. Drawing from cognitive dissonance theory, self-regulation theory, and motivational interviewing, the current study aims to evaluate the efficacy of an alcohol PFI with a values component to incorporate ideal-self discrepancy into a typical intervention.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

320

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oklahoma
      • Stillwater, Oklahoma, United States, 74078
        • North Murray Hall Oklahoma State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be at least 18 years of age
  • Must be able to speak and read English
  • Must report consuming alcohol in a typical week over the past month

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Must not deny drinking within the past month
  • Non-English speaking
  • Under the age of 18

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Values-PFI
The PFI with values will include information commonly included in personalized feedback interventions for alcohol use, such as norms information and drinking profile, as well as feedback on three of the assessed values that are highly important to the participant.
Other: Traditional-PFI with values assessment
This PFI will include information on drinking profile, norms, behavioral strategies used while drinking, and practical costs related to drinking reframed as monetary values and caloric values.
Other: Traditional PFI no values assessment
This PFI will include information on drinking profile, norms, behavioral strategies used while drinking, and practical costs related to drinking reframed as monetary values and caloric values.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Alcohol consumption
Time Frame: one-month post baseline
measured by drinks per week
one-month post baseline
Alcohol consequences
Time Frame: one month post-baseline
measured by the BYAACQ to determine number of consequences experienced in the past month post-baseline
one month post-baseline
Value-behavior discrepancy for values related to alcohol use
Time Frame: one month post-baseline
Measured by the VLQ-A to measure change in behavioral consistency with values specifically related to alcohol use one month post-baseline
one month post-baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceptions of norms
Time Frame: one month post-baseline
Perceptions of descriptive norms will be more accurate one month post-baseline
one month post-baseline
Trait mindfulness
Time Frame: one month post-baseline
Levels of mindfulness as measured by the FFMQ will be measured at both time points
one month post-baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 29, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 29, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AS1770

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Drinking

Clinical Trials on Personalized Feedback Intervention with Values

3
Subscribe