Impact of a Therapeutic Education Program on the Acceptance of Disease and Management of Care (EDUPACT)

February 8, 2018 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Impact of a Therapeutic Education Program Specifically Adapted to the Precarious People Supported in Therapeutic Coordination Apartments on the Acceptance of Their Disease and the Management of Their Care

Through its patient-centered approach and focus on developing coping skills and coping strategies, Health Education could be an effective approach in therapeutic coordination apartments to reduce the perceived treatment burden among people in precarious situations with one or more chronic diseases. Decreasing perception of burden would improve their quality of life and adherence to treatment.

The general hypothesis explored in this project is that the experience of the disease, the perception of the burden of treatment, the autonomy and the quality of life of the residents improve more importantly in therapeutic coordination apartments having implemented a formalized and structured Health Education approach (experimental group) than in those who did not set up formalized and structured Health Education approach (control group).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Context: The significant increase in the number of patients with chronic disease in France in recent years has led to the implementation of therapeutic patient education programs to develop their independence and quality of life in regard to their illness. Despite this growth, socio-economic status, cultural level or education still remain significant obstacles to access to Health education for patients with psychosocial vulnerability. In this context, the implementation of an Health education approach in specific living devices called therapeutic coordination apartments (TCA) was tested in 2011. The TCAs are medico-social establishments offering accommodation and temporary medical-psycho-social support to people in a situation of precariousness affected by at least one disabling chronic pathology in order to restore their autonomy. However, only two TCAs currently offer Health Education programs integrated with their activities. These two structures were supported by the Transverse Unit for Therapeutic Education (UTET) of the University Hospital of Nantes for the construction of these programs, now authorized by the Regional Health Agency of the Pays de la Loire and effective for 18 months.

Objective: The overall objective of the project is to evaluate the added value of integrated Health Education in TCA care. The main objective will be to compare, at 6 months of care, the perception of the burden of treatment among TCA residents integrating the practice of Health Education versus control group TCA residents. The burden of treatment is defined as the perception of the constraints on daily life related to all of what a person does to heal. The secondary objectives will be, on the one hand, to evaluate the impact of Health Education in TCA on: the state of health of the residents and the perception of their state of health, their quality of life and their empowerment. On the other hand, they will study the benefits, the brakes and the levers perceived by the teams that have integrated the Health Education in their activity.

METHOD: This is a pragmatic, controlled, quasi-experimental intervention trial comparing two groups of residents: one experimental group in two TCAs incorporating Health Education and one group of 4 control TCAs. The study will be mixed, qualitative and quantitative with residents and professionals. All new volunteer residents entering TCA for 1 year will be solicited (approximately 5 to 15 per TCA). The burden of treatment will be assessed for each group after 1 month in TCA (baseline) and then at 6 months by the Treatment Burden Questionnaire. The secondary criteria will be explored quantitatively at 1 month, 6 months and 12-18 months by the EQ-5D questionnaire, the 2 global items of the WHO-QOL Brief and the MAP13, as well as the count of hospitalizations and Resident emergencies, in relation to their chronic pathology. A qualitative survey consisting of individual interviews with residents and focus groups with Therapeutic Coordination Apartments' teams practicing Health Education. The total duration of the study is 36 months.

Perspectives: By showing a potential added value for the residents of the integration of Health Education within the TCAs, this project will confirm the interest to cross specific practices of care in TCA (adapted to the precarious people, having a low level of health literacy) with Health Education practices tailored to people with multiple pathologies. The study of the perceptions of teams integrating Health Education into their practice may encourage the diffusion of these still rare programs in these structures.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

68

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • La Roche-sur-Yon, France, 85000
        • Recruiting
        • Act Passerelle
        • Contact:
          • Delphine COPPENS, IDE
          • Phone Number: 02 51 62 09 64
      • Le Mans, France, 72100
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Act Acothe
        • Contact:
          • Alexandra Keromnes, IDE
          • Phone Number: 06 14 75 25 31
      • Nantes, France, 44093
      • Nantes, France, 44000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Act Aurore
        • Contact:
          • Brigitte Brasseur, IDE
          • Phone Number: 02 51 82 60 99
      • Nantes, France, 44300
        • Not yet recruiting
        • ACT Le Logis Montjoie
        • Contact:
          • Roxane BLANCHOT-FELIX
          • Phone Number: 02 40 94 31 33
      • Rennes, France, 35200
        • Not yet recruiting
        • ACT Louis Guilloux
        • Contact:
          • Cécile Fourdan, IDE
          • Phone Number: 02 99 28 96 18

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study focuses on patients in a precarious situation with chronic pathology (one or more) that are admitted in a Therapeutic Coordination Apartment (TCA). TCA's residents are women or men, French or coming from abroad, needing medical-social welfare support to manage their disease, treatments, everyday life, and approaches.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- residents admitted in therapeutic coordination apartments since October 2017;

  • with one or more chronic disease
  • over 18
  • accepting being enrolled in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • residents in situation of great psychological and / or physical suffering
  • Residents with diseases incompatible with questionnaires (cognitive disorders, impaired comprehension or severe speech disorder)
  • Residents non-francophone without interpreter
  • Residents under justice protective measure
  • Investigator declining the participation of a resident for any substantial reason

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
experimental
therapeutic coordination apartments with formalized/official Health education program
formalized/official Health education program
non formalized/official Health education program
active comparator
therapeutic coordination apartments without formalized/official Health education program
formalized/official Health education program
non formalized/official Health education program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
evaluation of the impact of a formal approach to therapeutic patient education on the intensity of the treatment burden perceived by residents compared to therapeutic coordination apartment residents not benefiting from an authorized program
Time Frame: 6 months after the enrolment in the study
The Baseline assessment and the 6 months assessment of Treatment burden score (assessed with TBQ:Treatment burden survey)
6 months after the enrolment in the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
impact of therapeutic patient education on residents' level of depression
Time Frame: 6 months after the enrolment in the study
comparison between assessments at baseline and after 6 months - (self-assessed by residents with Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale :HAD scale)
6 months after the enrolment in the study
impact of therapeutic patient education on residents' health status
Time Frame: 6 months after the enrolment in the study
comparison between assessments at baseline and after 6 months - (assessed with number of admission in emergency unit, number of hospitalizations)
6 months after the enrolment in the study
impact of therapeutic patient education on residents' empowerment level
Time Frame: 6 months after the enrolment in the study
comparison between assessments at baseline and after 6 months - (self-assessed by residents with Patient Actvation Measure survey (MAP13))
6 months after the enrolment in the study
impact of therapeutic patient education on residents' perception of health status
Time Frame: 6 months after the enrolment in the study
comparison between assessments at baseline and after 6 months - (self-assessed by residents with The World Healyh Organisation Quality of Life survey (WHO-QoL))
6 months after the enrolment in the study
impact of therapeutic patient education on residents' quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months after the enrolment in the study
comparison between assessments at baseline and after 6 months - (self-assessed by residents with Euroqol 5 dimensions survey (EQ-5D))
6 months after the enrolment in the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Clément Le Glatin, PH, CHU de Nantes

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 8, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RC17_0108

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Disease

Clinical Trials on Health education program

3
Subscribe