Change in ATOR Screening Test Scores Over 12 Weeks (ATOR)

March 27, 2026 updated by: Sergio Hijazo Larrosa, Universidad de Zaragoza

Validity of a Screening Test Compared to Other Measures in Senior Runners With Achilles Tendinopathy After a Physiotherapy Protocol

Achilles tendinopathy (AT) is one of the most common overuse injuries in runners, with an estimated incidence ranging from 0.6% to 18.5% of all running-related injuries, reaching up to 52% in elite runners. Its prevalence increases significantly from the fourth decade of life due to histological changes associated with aging, such as tissue degeneration, decreased vascularization, alterations in collagen structure, reduced recovery capacity, and increased tendon stiffness. The repetitive nature of running and the high proportion of the population practicing this sport make runners, especially those over 40 years old, a particularly vulnerable group.

The etiology of AT is multifactorial and includes biomechanical, physiological, and contextual factors. Major risk factors include sudden increases in load, planning errors in training, biomechanical alterations, overweight, metabolic comorbidities such as diabetes or dyslipidemia, and exposure to certain medications, especially corticosteroids and fluoroquinolones. In middle-aged individuals, the combination of intrinsic and extrinsic factors along with structural tendon changes explains both the higher prevalence and the worse prognosis observed in this population.

Physiotherapy is one of the preferred treatments for AT, with therapeutic exercise-particularly the Alfredson protocol-being the intervention with the strongest scientific support. Despite its efficacy, between 25% and 45% of patients do not achieve full recovery, suggesting the influence of clinical, personal, and contextual factors not always considered in studies. Additionally, there is high variability in return-to-sport times, which has led to the development of specific programs for runners over 40.

In the Aragón community, there are no studies describing the extent of AT in senior runners nor systematically analyzing their clinical characteristics, comorbidities, referral patterns, or healthcare service use. This lack of information hampers evidence-based decision-making and the planning of preventive and therapeutic strategies in physiotherapy. This study aims to fill this gap by providing contextualized information to improve clinical practice, healthcare pathways, and physiotherapeutic guidelines.

The hypothesis of the study is that an assessment system using screening has validity for detecting clinical changes in senior runners with Achilles tendon pain. The main objective is to determine the validity of this screening compared to other clinical measures after applying a physiotherapy protocol.

A clinimetric validity design is proposed. The sample will include 40 runners over 40 years old, belonging to sports clubs, who train at least three days a week and have participated in at least five 10 km races in the past year. Participants will be recruited through running clubs and social media, and randomly assigned to two groups of 20 people each. Exclusion criteria include recent invasive treatments, use of fluoroquinolones in the last year, autoimmune diseases, or difficulties understanding questionnaires.

Data collected will include sociodemographic, anthropometric, sports activity, and clinical variables through validated scales (VISA-A, NPRS, IPAQ, and SMFA), as well as ultrasound characteristics of the tendon, ankle mobility, passive calcaneal mobility, and functional screening tests based on active movements and jumps.

The procedure involves initial measurements, random assignment to control or experimental groups, and a 12-week home self-treatment program. Both groups will perform the Alfredson exercise protocol and receive health education; the experimental group will add analytical stretching of the posterior chain following OMT methodology.

Statistical analysis will assess intergroup and intragroup differences using repeated measures ANOVA, analyze time-group interactions, and include sensitivity-to-change statistics such as effect size, minimal clinically important difference, and reliable change index.

A gender perspective will be incorporated, limiting the representation of one sex to a maximum of 70% of the sample and analyzing results separately by gender. Main limitations include the small sample size, short follow-up duration, and limited control over adherence to home treatment.

Finally, the study clearly defines internal and external validity and clarifies the use of the term screening as a functional discrimination tool within a homogeneous and clinically defined population, without asserting generalization to the broader population.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Zaragoza
      • Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, 50009
        • Recruiting
        • Centro clínico de Fisioterapia OMT-E
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Senior runners
  • They belong to a running club
  • That they have run at least 5 10-kilometer races in the past year
  • They should work out at least three times a week

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Runners who have received physiotherapy treatment involving invasive techniques in the last 3 months
  • Runners who have received pharmacological treatment with fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin) in the last year
  • Runners with autoimmune diseases
  • Individuals with limited comprehension who may be unable to answer surveys

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group: Alfredson exercises + health education + analytical stretching
Program 1
Compared with the other intervention in this study, this approach adds analytical stretching and self-stretching of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles, following the Kaltenborn-Evjenth method, in patients with Achilles tendinopathy
Experimental: Control group: Alfredson exercises + health education
Program 2
Compared with the other intervention in this study, this approach does not include analytical stretching and self-stretching of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles based on the Kaltenborn-Evjenth method in patients with Achilles tendinopathy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change from baseline in total screening score (sum of five test scores) at 12 weeks
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
The total movement screening score is calculated as the sum of five movement-based tests assessing [e.g., mobility, stability, and functional movement]. Each test is scored independently according to predefined criteria, and the total score represents overall movement performance. Change from baseline is defined as the difference between baseline and 12-week values.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change from baseline in Achilles tendon thickness measured by ultrasound at two anatomical points at 12 weeks
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Achilles tendon thickness will be measured using ultrasound at two predefined anatomical points along the tendon. Measurements will be recorded in millimeters. Change from baseline is defined as the difference between baseline and 12-week values.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Mean change from baseline in VISA-A score at 12 weeks
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
The Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire will be used to assess symptoms and function in patients with Achilles tendinopathy. The VISA-A score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better function and fewer symptoms. Change from baseline is defined as the difference between baseline and 12-week values.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change from baseline in pain intensity measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at 12 weeks
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Change from baseline is defined as the difference between baseline and 12-week values.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Mean change from baseline in physical activity level measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) at 12 weeks
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Physical activity will be assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Results will be expressed according to standard scoring protocols (e.g., MET-minutes/week). Change from baseline is defined as the difference between baseline and 12-week values.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Mean change from baseline in functional status measured by the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) at 12 weeks
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Functional status will be assessed using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) questionnaire. Scores will be calculated according to standard scoring procedures, with higher scores indicating worse function. Change from baseline is defined as the difference between baseline and 12-week values.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Mean change from baseline in ankle dorsiflexion range of motion at 12 weeks
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks
Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion will be measured in degrees using a goniometer. Passive ankle mobility will be assessed through standardized physiotherapy examination procedures. Change from baseline is defined as the difference between baseline and 12-week values.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 16, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 18, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 18, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PI22/179

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

This study collects clinical and functional information from patients with Achilles tendinopathy, including demographic data, pain measures, functional tests, and patient-reported outcomes. However, the informed consent for this trial does not include permission for secondary use or external sharing of de-identified individual data.

In addition, the purpose of the study is to evaluate two specific physiotherapy-based intervention programs, and the dataset is not intended for broader data-sharing or secondary analyses outside the primary research group.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Achilles Tendinopathy (AT)

Clinical Trials on Alfredson Exercise Program + Health Education + Analytical Stretching

Subscribe