Exercise Dose-response for Diabetes in the Elderly (EDDIE)

September 4, 2018 updated by: Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre

Exercise Dose-response for Diabetes in the Elderly: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

One-center randomized, three-arm, parallel, superiority, controlled trial in 132 elderly outpatients with type 2 diabetes. Two different combined exercise training doses (300min/week vs 150min/week) will be compared against usual care. The entire study length will last 24 weeks, and assessments will be conducted at baseline, previously to the group allocation, at 12 weeks and at 24 weeks just after the treatments' end. The study's primary outcome is the glycated hemoglobin level at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes of clinical relevance to type 2 diabetes and elderlies will also be acquired.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is a randomized controlled trial, three-arm parallel-group. The first aim is to evaluate the efficacy of a supervised and structured combined exercise training program in HbA1c levels at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes measurements of clinical relevance for type 2 diabetes and elderly patients are included at 12 and 24 weeks.

The investigators will enroll 132 elderlies divided into three experimental groups, randomized in a ratio of 1:1 (44 patients per group). The treatments arms comprises structured supervised combined exercise training programs, three times a week, lasting 24 weeks of duration. The G150 group will exercise 150 min per week of aerobic and strength training (50 min per session, 25 min for each modality) and the G300 group will exercise twice the volume in the same G150's intensity, and week frequency (100 min per session, 50 min for each modality). No intervention will be offered to the control group (i.e., they will continue their usual care). Treatments arms will progress on training load tailored by their maximal heart rate percentage for aerobic training and maximal repetitions for strength training.

The sample size was calculated considering a between-group mean difference of 0.45%, with standard deviation of 0.7% in HbA1c levels, for an 80% of statistical power and 5% of type 1 error, in a superiority hypothesis design.

In detail, the primary outcome is the HbA1c level at 24 weeks, an secondary outcomes are: HbA1c levels at 12 weeks; office blood pressure assessed through a digital sphygmomanometer at 12 and 24 weeks; lipid profile (total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides) at 24 weeks; endothelial function assessed by flow-mediated dilation at 12 and 24 weeks; intima-media thickness at 24 weeks; physical fitness assessed by maximal oxygen uptake and maximal muscle strength at 24 weeks; body composition assessed by dual x ray absorptiometry at 24 weeks; quality of life and geriatric depressive symptoms assessed by questionnaires at 24 weeks.

The investigators hypothesized that the G300 will greater improve the 24-week HbA1c levels and secondary outcomes against the G150 and the control group. The present study was designed and will be conducted by a multidisciplinary staff, and follows ethical and methodological standards for randomized clinical trials. As for empirical evidence provision, it is expected to highlight the efficacy of the non-pharmacological treatment for type 2 diabetes in the elderly patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

132

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Rio Grande Do Sul
      • Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Daniel Umpierre, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Beatriz D'Agord Schaan, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus by HbA1c (> 6.5%) or capillary casual glycemia (> 126 mg/dL), oral glucose tolerance test or hypoglycemic drug use;
  • HbA1c ≥ 7.5%;
  • Verified ability to exercise;
  • Physically inactive or regularly exercising for at least once a week.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HbA1c ≤ 12%;
  • Severe cardiovascular disease (class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmia, unstable angina, or use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator);
  • Major cardiovascular events 1 year previously to the enrollment (non-fatal myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, cardiac catheterization, deep vein thrombosis, hospitalization or other severe health-related event);
  • Chronic renal disease requesting dialysis;
  • Severe macular injury (retinopathy) that disables patients to enroll an exercise program;
  • Severe cognitive impairment (dementia) that disables patients to enroll an exercise program;
  • Deafness that disables patients to enroll an exercise program;
  • Blindness that disables patients to enroll an exercise program;
  • Progressive neurological disorders (Parkinson, multiple sclerosis, etc.) that disables patients to enroll an exercise program;
  • Osteoarticular or muscular injuries or another health conditions which generate inability to carry on the interventions;
  • Plans of moving to another city during the study;
  • Living together with another person enrolled in the study;
  • A medical report indicating exercise contraindication based on a cardiopulmonary exercise testing;
  • Inability or refusal to give written consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Participants randomized to this group will perform monthly cohabitation meetings.
Experimental: G150
Participants randomized to this group will be enrolled to a 150 min/week structured and supervised exercise training. The program consists of 3 sessions in a week, each of these lasting 50 minutes. The session will be composed of aerobic training (25 minutes at 60-75% of HRmax) and strength training (25 minutes, 8 whole-body exercises at up to 8-12 maximal repetitions).
This group will receive 150 min/week of combined exercise training, structured and supervised.
Experimental: G300
Participants randomized to this group will be enrolled to the same structural settings of G150 group (type of exercise, exercise intensity and weekly frequency). They will receive twice the G150 group dose's. To do so, each session will last 100 minutes (50 minutes of aerobic exercise training and 50 minutes of strength training).
This group will receive 300 min/week of combined exercise training, structured and supervised.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HbA1c
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Glycated hemoglobin in DCCT units (%)
Change from baseline to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HbA1c
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks
Glycated hemoglobin in DCCT units (%)
Change from baseline to 12 weeks
Office Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured through automatic oscillometric device in mmHg
Change from baseline to 12 weeks
Office Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured through automatic oscillometric device in mmHg
Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Lower limbs functional capacity
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
By using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), lower-limb mobility will be assess in the following sequence: static standing balance, walking speed and indirect muscle strength. The performance of functional activities will be converted to a standardized scale from 0 (poor functional capacity) to 12 points (excellent functional capacity)
Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) assessed by maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing and reported in its weighted form (ml/kg/min)
Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Geriatric Depression Symptoms
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Geriatric depression alertness and improvements will be assessed through a questionnaire comprised by 15 questions in a YES/NO answer options nested to 0/1 numbered options. Alertness of geriatric depression is characterized when the overall score reaches 5 points or below it. The overall score is calculated a posteriori due to variations on questions directions (e.g., YES = 1 or YES = 0 conditioned to the question).
Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Endothelial function, early adaptation
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 12 weeks
Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) assessed through high resolution ultrasonography
Change from baseline to 12 weeks
Endothelial function
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) assessed through high resolution ultrasonography
Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Intima-media thickness
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Intima-media thickness (IMT) assessed through high resolution ultrasonography
Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Body composition
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Body composition assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry system (DXA)
Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Patients' quality of life will be assessed by the World Health Organization Quality of Life for Elderlies (WHOQoL-OLD) instrument. It comprises 24 questions and answers are presented in a one-way direction, 1-to-5 scale.
Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Muscle thickness
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Muscle thickness assessed through high resolution ultrasonography
Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Muscle quality
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Image echo-intensity assessed through high resolution ultrasonography
Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Lower body maximal muscle strength
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 24 weeks
Lower body maximal muscle strength will be assessed by the knee extension one-maximal repetition test, reported in kilograms (kg).
Change from baseline to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Umpierre, PhD, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre/Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
  • Study Director: Beatriz Schaan, MD, PhD, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre/Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 31, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Data HbA1c and neuromuscular function and any deemed relevant support information (sociodemographic, clinical history and allocated groups) will be shared if available. Details regarding the study's design and statistical plan can be obtained consulting the trial's protocol. Data on other outcomes could be requested contacting the PI. Data access will be available after all participants completed the study and will remain accessible for as long as deemed necessary by the study's committee. Data sets, variables' dictionary and statistical analysis description will be made available online upon registration at a clinical trial management system nested to the EDDIE Study's website (www.ufrgs.br/eddie), and the access will be permitted after acceptance of the EDDIE Study team's data sharing terms and policy.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The individual participant dataset will become available up to six months after the first study publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

A simple registration aside a policy acceptance term will grant access to study's datasets.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Analytic Code

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type2 Diabetes

3
Subscribe