The Value of Endocervical and Endometrial Lidocaine Flushing Before Office Hystroscopy

May 18, 2018 updated by: Ahmed Maged, Cairo University
women candidate for office hystroscopy were randomized to either flushing of the endocervix and endometrium with 4 ml lidocaine 2% diluted in 15 ml normal saline or 19 ml normal saline before office hystroscopy

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Patients were asked to urinate to evacuate the bladder. Posterior vaginal retractor was introduced to expose the cervix and ( embryo transfer catheter was introduced throught the cervix passing the internal os and intrauterine and intracervical instillation of to either flushing of the endocervix and endometrium with 4 ml lidocaine 2% diluted in 15 ml normal saline or 19 ml normal saline.

After 5 mins the procedure was started A rigid 3.5 mm hystroscope with an optic of 30 degrees was used. Normal saline solution was used as distension media, with 120 mmHg intrauterine pressure, Vaginoscopic approach, nocervical tenaculum or dilators used.

Post procedure pain management by optional dose of 75 mg of diclofenac potassium when requested.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

250

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 12111
        • Kasr Alainy medical school

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all women indicated for office hysteroscopy for evaluation of the uterine cavity eg: AUB, infertility

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women allergic to local anesthesia those required operative hysteroscopy under general anesthesia pelvic inflammatory disease known cervical malignancy profuse uterine bleeding, marked cervical stenosis recent uterine perforation previous cervical surgery and neurological disorders affecting evaluation of pain using other products that could affect the consistency of the cervix such as local estrogen, misoprostol or laminaire are contraindications for office hystroscopy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Lidocaine group
intrauterine and intracervical instillation of 4 ml of lidocaine 2% diluted in 15 ml normal saline 5 minutes before hystroscopy
intrauterine and intracervical instillation of 4 ml of lidocaine 2% diluted in 15 ml normal saline
A rigid 3.5 mm hystroscope with an optic of 30 degrees was used. Normal saline solution was used as distension media, with 120 mmHg intrauterine pressure, Vaginoscopic approach, nocervical tenaculum or dilators used.
Placebo Comparator: control group
intrauterine and intracervical instillation of 19 ml normal saline 5 minutes before hystroscopy
A rigid 3.5 mm hystroscope with an optic of 30 degrees was used. Normal saline solution was used as distension media, with 120 mmHg intrauterine pressure, Vaginoscopic approach, nocervical tenaculum or dilators used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain assessment during the hysteroscopy
Time Frame: during hystroscopy procedure
pain assessment during hystroscopy using visual analogue scale VAS. is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100
during hystroscopy procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain assessment 10 minutes after hysteroscopy
Time Frame: 10 minutes after hysteroscopy
pain assessment 10 minutes after hystroscopy using visual analogue scale VAS. is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100
10 minutes after hysteroscopy
Pain assessment 30 minutes after hysteroscopy
Time Frame: 30 minutes after hysteroscopy
pain assessment 30 minutes after hystroscopy using visual analogue scale VAS. is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100
30 minutes after hysteroscopy
Pain assessment 60 minutes after hysteroscopy
Time Frame: 60 minutes after hysteroscopy
pain assessment 60 minutes after hystroscopy using visual analogue scale VAS. is a psychometric response scale which can be used in questionnaires. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100
60 minutes after hysteroscopy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain During Hystroscopy

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine

3
Subscribe