Comparison of Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Lidocaine Spray for Hysteroscopy

October 30, 2012 updated by: Sertac ESIN, Dr. Sami Ulus Children's Hospital

Comparison of Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Lidocaine Spray for Pain Relief in Office Hysteroscopy: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Hysteroscopy is an instrument to visualize the interior walls of uterus (womb) and it enables the doctor to do minor operative procedures. Although it causes little discomfort, sometimes it may be disturbing for the patient. This pain is usually perceived during the passage of the instrument through the cervix (neck of the womb). The investigators would like to minimize this pain by two drugs: Misoprotol and lidocaine

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Outpatient or office hysteroscopy has become the 'gold standard' for the investigation of the intrauterine abnormalities. This minimal invasive modality provides brilliant and clear visualization of the entire uterine cavity and besides this, by the operative channel, minor procedures may easily be performed in the office setting which is priceless for the gynecologist. However, pain related to the procedure may make the procedure uncomfortable for the patient and the physician. Together with the operative time, hysteroscope diameter is considered as the main factor influencing pain. The pain perceived during hysteroscopy may be reduced by using a smaller diameter hysteroscope or by using anesthesia, which decreases pain perception.

In this prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study, we aim to compare the effectiveness of sublingual misoprostol versus lidocaine pump spray for pain relief during office hysteroscopy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

138

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06090
        • Dr Sami Ulus Maternity and Children Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 49 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Premenopausal women in the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle with no contraindication for hysteroscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • vaginal bleeding at the time of the procedure
  • known sensitivity to lidocaine (amide group local anesthetics) or prostaglandins
  • epilepsy
  • significantly impaired respiratory or cardiac conduction functions
  • hypertension
  • glaucoma
  • renal failure
  • acute liver disease
  • uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • pregnancy or suspicion of pregnancy
  • pelvic inflammatory disease
  • cervical operation history
  • vaginismus.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sublingual Misoprostol & Lidocaine placebo
Misoprostol 200 µg sublingually single dose and Lidocaine spray placebo
Other Names:
  • Cytotec
The pharmacy-produced sterile saline containing pump spray external characteristics identical to lidocaine pump spray
Experimental: Lidocaine Pump Spray & Misoprostol placebo
Lidocaine Pump spray, 6 sprays to cervix (60 mg totally) and sublingual misoprotol placebo
Other Names:
  • Xylocaine %10 pump spray
Lactose filler, the pharmacy-produced pills identical to original misoprostol pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient VAS score immediately after the procedure
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure
Immediately after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient VAS score 10 minutes after the procedure
Time Frame: 10 minutes after the procedure
10 minutes after the procedure

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Need for cervical dilation
Time Frame: During the procedure
During the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Tuncay Kucukozkan, Professor, Sami Ulus Maternity and Childrens Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 31, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 31, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2012

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain During Hysteroscopy

Clinical Trials on Sublingual Misoprostol

3
Subscribe