Lidocaine Patch Versus Intravenous Lidocaine in Pain Relief After Laparoscopy

August 7, 2020 updated by: hany farouk, Aswan University Hospital

Is Lidocaine Patch as Effective as Intravenous Lidocaine in Pain and Illus Reduction After Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery? A Randomized Clinical Trial

To evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine patch applied around wound in laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in reduction of postoperative pain and illus compared to intravenous lidocaine infusion and placebo.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Postoperative pain after gynecologic surgery is a challenging problem associated with increased morbidity and cost. The inflammatory response to surgery plays a crucial rule in inducing postoperative illus. Systemic local anesthetics proved to have anti-inflammatory properties that may be beneficial in preventing ileus added to its analgesic actions. The lidocaine patch evaluated in many types of pain with promising results. The study try to evaluate the patch in perioperative field as a more simple and safe technique than the intravenous route.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aswan, Egypt, 81528
        • Aswan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • female undergoing elective gynecologic surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known allergy to lidocaine,
  • respiratory or cardiac dysfunction, arrhythmia, treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs,
  • inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis)
  • hepatic, renal
  • chronic use of analgesics or corticosteroids

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: lidocaine patches
for every port entry site from the three in ports of laparoscope, patients received three lidocaine patches 5% (Lidoderm® , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Chadds Ford, PA). Each patch measured 10 cm × 14 cm and contains (700 mg), was divided into two equal parts, six parts applied two of it around one port entry site that marked before sterilization and just before induction of anesthesia. The patches not changed until removed after return of bowel function or on the maximum at fifth postoperative day.
for every port entry site from the three in ports of laparoscope, patients received three lidocaine patches 5% (Lidoderm® , Endo Pharmaceuticals, Chadds Ford, PA). Each patch measured 10 cm × 14 cm and contains (700 mg), was divided into two equal parts, six parts applied two of it around one port entry site that marked before sterilization and just before induction of anesthesia. The patches not changed until removed after return of bowel function or on the maximum at fifth postoperative day.
Other Names:
  • lidocaine patch
Active Comparator: IV lidocaine
received i.v. lidocaine infusion after induction of anesthesia, 2 mg/min if body weight >70 kg or 1 mg/min if body weight <70 kg.
received i.v. lidocaine infusion after induction of anesthesia, 2 mg/min if body weight >70 kg or 1 mg/min if body weight <70 kg.
Other Names:
  • lidocaine infusion
Placebo Comparator: IV saline infusion
received i.v. saline infusion.
received i.v. saline infusion.
Other Names:
  • placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain VAS scores at rest and during coughing were recorded postoperatively
Time Frame: 24 hours
To determine if lidocaine patch is superior to placebo as an adjunctive therapy for acute postoperative pain. Average pain score in women at 24 hours postoperatively. Measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a scale which measures pain from 0 to 100 with 0="no pain" and 100="the worst pain you have ever felt".
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infertility

Clinical Trials on lidocaine patches

3
Subscribe