Reducing Barriers and Sustaining Utilization of a Cervical Cancer Screening Program in Rural Senegal

June 13, 2022 updated by: Jon Andrew Dykens, University of Illinois at Chicago
This research project will investigate the determinants of cervical cancer screening uptake and sustained utilization in this region and develop and evaluate a context-specific peer education behavioral intervention to improve uptake. Research supports the effectiveness of peer education in increasing cancer screening rates but, currently, no cervical cancer screening peer education program specific to rural Senegal exists. To inform the participatory development of this program, the investigators will assess barriers and facilitators of screening at multiple levels: individuals (women aged 30 to 59), households (family or principle social unit of at-risk women), and the community (immediate village or neighborhood with common amenities of at-risk women). We hypothesize that a peer education program that adapts to changing contexts over time and is targeted at a multi-level audience will result in early, widespread uptake and sustained use of the VIA cervical cancer screening program. Study findings will inform programmatic planning in Kedougou and the peer education curriculum we develop can serve as a template for maximizing early impact of new cervical cancer screening services implemented in other areas of rural Senegal. Our long-term goal is to inform national-level policy to guide the implementation of cervical cancer screening programs in other rural Senegal regions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The goal of this study is to inform the sustainable implementation of cervical cancer screening services in low-resource areas of Senegal naïve to cancer screening programs by

  1. investigating the access barriers and determinants of initial uptake and
  2. developing and adapting a peer education health promotion intervention to diverse and dynamic contexts to achieve sustained utilization.

Framework: Implementation Science is the study of how proven technical solutions are applicable to real world settings. The investigators will study how the implementation of VIA, as a proven intervention, can be optimized and how the screening service can best "fit" into the local context. Established complementary frameworks will guide our study. The investigators will apply

  1. the Patient-Centered Access Framework to assess the demand-side barriers and facilitators of uptake in aim 1,
  2. the Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change to evaluate how a peer education program facilitates self-management behavior of women in aim 2, and
  3. the Dynamic Sustainability Framework to evaluate the initial uptake and sustained utilization of the health service in aim 3.

The investigators seek to understand the dynamic nature of the influential factors within the local context and the process by which the investigators can facilitate responsive adaptations to the intervention in order to reduce barriers, maximize early uptake, and sustain utilization.

Overview of Study Data Collection: To achieve all aims, the investigators will conduct a cluster-randomized stepped wedge study across three representative clusters (each containing a district center and two rural sites) in the Kedougou region. For each aim the investigators will collect data at baseline and at 6-month intervals in each cluster (data collection intervals coincide with the initiation of the intervention in a new cluster). In aim 1, the investigators will develop (through a participatory approach), pilot, and conduct surveys of eligible clients and household questionnaires as well as focus groups (FG) (women ages 30-44 and 45-59) and in-depth interviews of men (ages 30-59). For aim 2, the investigators will describe the development, piloting, implementation, and adaptation of an aim 1-informed context-specific multi-level peer education curriculum across clusters through the stepped wedge approach in the Kedougou region. The investigators will collect quantitative program reach data and qualitative process evaluation data at each time period. These data will be used to adapt the intervention over time. To achieve aim 3, the investigators will collect aggregated health service level utilization data and individual surveys.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dakar, Senegal
        • Sénégal Ministère de la Santé et l'Action Sociale Département de Recherche
      • Dakar, Senegal
        • Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal Cancer Institute & Institute of Health and Development
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • University of Illinois at Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 59 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Women. Criteria for inclusion include:

  • female Senegal citizen between the ages of 30 and 59,
  • Resident in Kedougou Region,
  • eligible to seek cervical cancer prevention services at a designated intervention or control health center in the Kedougou Region, Senegal,
  • willing to participate in survey assessments; 5) able to give informed consent.

Men. Criteria for inclusion include:

  • male Senegal citizen between the ages of 30 and 59,
  • Resident in Kedougou Region,
  • living in a household with at least one woman eligible to seek cervical cancer prevention services at a designated intervention or control health center in the Kedougou Region, Senegal,
  • willing to participate in survey assessments;
  • able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No additional exclusion criteria exist.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SCREENING
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SEQUENTIAL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Cervical Cancer Screening Education
Context-specific multi-level peer education cervical cancer screening education curriculum is implemented by Care Groups. This is conducted through a cluster-randomized stepped wedge study. Cluster 1 (randomly selected) crosses to the intervention arm at Period 2, Cluster 2 (randomly selected) crosses over to the intervention arm at Period 3, and so on. By the end of the study, all clusters will cross over to the intervention arm (one-way), though in random order. At the end of the final time period, the outcome of interest is compared between the intervention and control periods within each cluster. Differences in service utilization and recommendation will be compared, whereby clusters serve as their own controls as they cross over from the control to intervention group.
a multi-modal peer education curriculum directed at a multi-level audience and aimed at motivating women to seek cervical cancer screening services.
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
No educational program is implemented for each cluster prior to crossover to intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the number of women screened for the first time, age stratified
Time Frame: measured at baseline and every 6 months through 35 months.
Number of women who are screened for cervical cancer
measured at baseline and every 6 months through 35 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the number of women and men recommending the service
Time Frame: measured at baseline and every 6 months through 35 months.
Number of women and men recommending that women of screening age get cervical cancer screening
measured at baseline and every 6 months through 35 months.
Change in the knowledge of cervical cancer
Time Frame: measured at baseline and every 6 months through 35 months.
Composite of Knowledge of cervical cancer score from the quantitative survey
measured at baseline and every 6 months through 35 months.
Change in the number of women being re-screened, age stratified
Time Frame: measured at baseline and every 6 months through 35 months.
Number of women being re-screened at 2 years per regional policy
measured at baseline and every 6 months through 35 months.
Change in the number of individuals directly receiving intervention
Time Frame: measured at baseline and every 6 months through 35 months.
Number of individuals communities directly receiving intervention
measured at baseline and every 6 months through 35 months.
Change in the number of households directly receiving intervention
Time Frame: measured at baseline and every 6 months through 35 months.
Number of households directly receiving intervention
measured at baseline and every 6 months through 35 months.
Change in the number communities directly receiving intervention
Time Frame: measured at baseline and every 6 months through 35 months.
Number of communities directly receiving intervention
measured at baseline and every 6 months through 35 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 3, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 15, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We will share all IPD that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Upon completion of the study. The materials will be available indefinitely.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Cancer

Clinical Trials on Care Group Cervical Cancer Screening Education Curriculum

3
Subscribe