Two Neck Ultrasound Measurements as Predictors of Difficult Laryngoscopy

May 23, 2018 updated by: Abele Donati, MD, Università Politecnica delle Marche

Evaluation of Two Neck Ultrasound Measurements as Predictors of Difficult Laryngoscopy: a Prospective Trial

Background: Unpredictable laryngoscopic difficulty remains a dramatic challenge for anaesthesiologists. Ultrasound (US) based airway assessment has been recently proposed as a useful tool in adjunct to clinical methods, but to date few studies are available about the potential role of ultrasound in difficult airway evaluation.

The aim of this study is to determine the correlation between the sonographic measurements of anterior cervical soft tissues's thickness and Cormack-Lehane grade view at direct laryngoscopy in patients with normal clinical screening tests.

Design: Prospective, single blinded, observational study. Number of patients: 300 adult patients Methods: All patients are assessed before surgery to evaluate clinical evidence of difficult airways. Simultaneous ultrasound measures of the anterior cervical soft tissues are performed.

At induction of anaesthesia the laryngoscopic view is graded by a different anaesthetist, blinded to the ultrasound assessments.

Statistical analysis:

Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) are used to determine the "difficulty prediction capability" of each sonographic measurement and to assess the optimal cut-off scores To allow for comparisons between "restricted-difficult" airway and "easy" airway groups, a two-sided Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test is employed as appropriate. The results will be averaged (mean ± standard deviation SD) for each parameter for continuous data. Values of p < 0.05 are considered as statistically significant.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Unpredictable laryngoscopic difficulty, especially if difficult ventilation occurs, during standard laryngoscopy, remains a dramatic challenge for anaesthesiologists. Accurate airway assessment should always be performed, but the common clinical screening tests have shown low sensitivity and specificity with a limited predictive value. Ultrasound (US) based airway assessment has been recently proposed as a useful, simple, bedside and non-invasive tool in adjunct to clinical methods, but to date few studies are available about the potential role of ultrasound in difficult airway evaluation and these are mostly limited on specific groups of patients.

The aim of this prospective, single blinded, observational study is to determine the correlation between two neck ultrasound measures assessed at the pre-operative visit and Cormack-Lehane grade view at direct laryngoscopy, assessed at the induction of anaesthesia 24 hours later.

METHODS: During the pre-operative visit (24 hours before surgery), clinical screening tests to predict a difficult airway are performed and the anterior cervical soft tissue's thickness is assesses.

The thickness of the anterior cervical soft tissues is measured at two levels, thyro-hyoid membrane (pre-epiglottis space) and vocal cords (laryngeal inlet), using a US probe 10-13-MHz linear transducer placed in the transverse plane with the patient's head in neutral position.

On each level the distance from the skin in the median axis in cm (mDSE = median distance skin to epiglottis; mVC = median distance skin to vocal cords) and the surrounding Area in cm2 (PEA = pre-epiglottis area; AVC = Area pre vocal cords) are measured.

At the induction of anaesthesia the laryngoscopic view is graded by a different anaesthetist blinded to the ultrasound assessments and with more than 5 years of experience with OR activity. For each patient it's considered only the best attempt at direct laryngoscopy obtained after optimizing position, complete muscle relaxation (TOF=0), and, if necessary, external laryngeal manipulation. A decrease of SpO2 < 92% is a criterion for abandoning the procedure and a maximum of three attempts are admitted before declaring intubation failure with direct laryngoscopy. A Cormack-Lehane Grade 1 or 2a are classified as easy laryngoscopy and grade 2b - 3a - 3b or 4 as restricted or difficult laryngoscopy.

STATISTICAL ANALISYS: According to the literature, ultrasound measurements should predict as difficult at least 80% of the intubations that are really difficult (with a C-L ≥ 2b). Since the incidence of difficult intubation is about 5-10% of all intubations 1-3,6, it is necessary to study at least 244 patients in order to obtain statistically significant differences between the two groups accepting an alpha error of 0.05 and a beta error of 0.20.

Kolmogorov-Smirnov's test is used to test the normality of distribution. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) is used to determine the "difficulty prediction capability" of each sonographic measurement and to assess the optimal cut-off scores To allow for comparisons between "restricted-difficult" airway and "easy" airway groups, a two-sided Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test are employed as appropriate. The results will be averaged (mean ± standard deviation SD) for each parameter for continuous data. Values of p < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

ETHICS: Ethical approval for this study was provided by Marche's Regional Ethics Committee (CERM), Ancona, ITA (Protocol No. 2016-0405); Chairperson: Prof Marcello D'Errico on 23 March 2017. Informed written consent was obtained. The study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ancona, Italy, 60126
        • AOU Ospedali Riuniti Ancona - Università Politecnica delle Marche

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All the adult patients undergoing to pre-operative evaluation for elective surgery at AOU-University Hospital of Ancona

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients undergoing pre-operative evaluation for elective surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Predicted difficult intubation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
median Distance Skin to Epiglottis (mDSE)
Time Frame: 24 hours
The median Distance Skin to Epiglottis, unit of measure cm, is detected using a US linear probe (10-13-MHz) with the transducer placed in the transverse plane and the patient's head in neutral position. It represents the distance from the skin in the median axis and the epiglottis
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Abele Donati, MD, PhD, UNIVPM, University of Ancona

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-0405

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Difficult Intubation

3
Subscribe