- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03624439
Duble Lumen Intubation
July 29, 2019 updated by: Łukasz Szarpak, Lazarski University
Evaluation of the Double-Lumen Tube Vivasight-DL vs. Standard Duble-lumen Tube in Normal and Difficult Airway Scenarios: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover, Simulation Trial
Intrabronal intubation is one of the basic methods of airway protection during cardiac surgery.
The use of double-lumen tubes in the implementation of a standard method based on macintosh laryngoscope may cause the prolongation of the procedure especially in the case of difficult airways.
The aim of the study was to match the effectiveness of endotracheal intubation using a standard Macontosh laryngskop and a normal double-lumen tube versus the ETView DL tube.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
47
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Masovian
-
Warsaw, Masovian, Poland, 02-662
- Faculty of Medicine, Lazarski University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- anesthesiologist or a person in the course of specialization
- consent voluntary participation in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- refusal to participate in the study
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Normal airway
normal airway.
the language has not been inflated.
the instructor assessed the difficulty of intubation based on the Cormack - Lehane scale to the first degree
|
intubation using standard double-lumen tube with Macintosh laryngoscope
intubation using Double-Lumen Video Tube Vivasight-DL with Macintosh laryngoscope
|
|
Experimental: Difficult airway
dofficult airway.
Difficult airways were obtained by means of language inflation using a simulator control panel, so as to obtain the degree of intubation difficulty assessed by an independent anesthesiologist to the third degree according to the Cormack-Lehane scale
|
intubation using standard double-lumen tube with Macintosh laryngoscope
intubation using Double-Lumen Video Tube Vivasight-DL with Macintosh laryngoscope
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
intubation time
Time Frame: 1 day
|
from taking of the intubation device to successful intubation
|
1 day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
time to visualize the glottis
Time Frame: 1 day
|
time defined as the time from taking laryngoscope in hand until you obtain visualize the glottis
|
1 day
|
|
success of the first intubation trial
Time Frame: 1 day
|
effectiveness of the first attempt of intubation by participants using four intubation devices
|
1 day
|
|
overall success rate
Time Frame: 1 day
|
effectiveness measured during a maximum of three intubation attempts, confirmed by a single lung ventilation test
|
1 day
|
|
the degree of visibility of the glottis
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The POGO score describes how much glottic opening is visible.
A POGO score of 100% indicates visualization of the entire glottic opening from the anterior commissure of the vocal cords to the interarytenoid notch.
A POGO score of 0% corresponds with no visualization of laryngeal structures.
|
1 day
|
|
Cormack - Lehane grade
Time Frame: 1 day
|
self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4)
|
1 day
|
|
ease of use
Time Frame: 1 day
|
To access subjective opinions about the difficulty of the each intubation method, participants were asked to give a rating on a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 100 (extremely difficult).
|
1 day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jacek Smereka, PhD, Wroclaw Medical University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Bialka S, Copik M, Rybczyk K, Owczarek A, Jedrusik E, Czyzewski D, Filipowski M, Rivas E, Ruetzler K, Szarpak L, Misiolek H. Assessment of changes of regional ventilation distribution in the lung tissue depending on the driving pressure applied during high frequency jet ventilation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Jul 31;18(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0552-2.
- Szarpak L, Kurowski A, Zasko P, Karczewska K, Czyzewski L, Bogdanski L, Adamczyk P, Truszewski Z. Double-lumen tube tracheal intubation in a manikin model using the VivaSight Double Lumen: a randomized controlled comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;34(1):103-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Oct 23. No abstract available.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 7, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 30, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
June 30, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 7, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
August 10, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 31, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 29, 2019
Last Verified
July 1, 2019
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- ETI_2018_DL1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Undecided
IPD Plan Description
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on request.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Intubation; Difficult or Failed
-
Catharina Ziekenhuis EindhovenCompletedAnesthesia Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation | Failed or Difficult Intubation, Initial EncounterNetherlands
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)RecruitingIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, Australia, Austria, India, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation;Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States, Canada, Singapore
-
Spanish Network for Research in Infectious DiseasesCompletedIntubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedSpain
-
Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityCompletedIntubation; Difficult or Failed | Difficult LaryngoscopyTurkey
-
Selcuk UniversityCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedTurkey
-
Groupe Hospitalier de Bretagne SudCentre National d'Etudes SpatialesCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedFrance
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedKorea, Republic of
-
B.P. Koirala Institute of Health SciencesUnknownIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedNepal
-
Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research...Not yet recruitingIntubation; Difficult or Failed
Clinical Trials on Standard double-lumen tube
-
International Institute of Rescue Research and...Unknown
-
Rambam Health Care CampusCompletedEndotracheal Intubation | Airway Management | One Lung Ventilation
-
Diansan SuNingbo No.2 Hospital; Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing UniversityNot yet recruitingThoracoscopic Surgery | Double Lumen Tube IntubationChina
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterCompletedSingle Lung Ventilation | Double Lumen Endotracheal TubeUnited States
-
Medical University of SilesiaCompletedPredictive Value of Tests | Intubation;DifficultPoland
-
Zhejiang UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Seoul National University HospitalUnknownPreventing Blood Leakage of Bronchial CuffKorea, Republic of
-
Rennes University HospitalCompletedPancreaticoduodenectomy | Digestive System Surgical ProcedureFrance
-
University Medical Centre LjubljanaUnknown