Duble Lumen Intubation

July 29, 2019 updated by: Łukasz Szarpak, Lazarski University

Evaluation of the Double-Lumen Tube Vivasight-DL vs. Standard Duble-lumen Tube in Normal and Difficult Airway Scenarios: A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover, Simulation Trial

Intrabronal intubation is one of the basic methods of airway protection during cardiac surgery. The use of double-lumen tubes in the implementation of a standard method based on macintosh laryngoscope may cause the prolongation of the procedure especially in the case of difficult airways. The aim of the study was to match the effectiveness of endotracheal intubation using a standard Macontosh laryngskop and a normal double-lumen tube versus the ETView DL tube.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

47

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Masovian
      • Warsaw, Masovian, Poland, 02-662
        • Faculty of Medicine, Lazarski University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • anesthesiologist or a person in the course of specialization
  • consent voluntary participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Normal airway
normal airway. the language has not been inflated. the instructor assessed the difficulty of intubation based on the Cormack - Lehane scale to the first degree
intubation using standard double-lumen tube with Macintosh laryngoscope
intubation using Double-Lumen Video Tube Vivasight-DL with Macintosh laryngoscope
Experimental: Difficult airway
dofficult airway. Difficult airways were obtained by means of language inflation using a simulator control panel, so as to obtain the degree of intubation difficulty assessed by an independent anesthesiologist to the third degree according to the Cormack-Lehane scale
intubation using standard double-lumen tube with Macintosh laryngoscope
intubation using Double-Lumen Video Tube Vivasight-DL with Macintosh laryngoscope

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intubation time
Time Frame: 1 day
from taking of the intubation device to successful intubation
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time to visualize the glottis
Time Frame: 1 day
time defined as the time from taking laryngoscope in hand until you obtain visualize the glottis
1 day
success of the first intubation trial
Time Frame: 1 day
effectiveness of the first attempt of intubation by participants using four intubation devices
1 day
overall success rate
Time Frame: 1 day
effectiveness measured during a maximum of three intubation attempts, confirmed by a single lung ventilation test
1 day
the degree of visibility of the glottis
Time Frame: 1 day
The POGO score describes how much glottic opening is visible. A POGO score of 100% indicates visualization of the entire glottic opening from the anterior commissure of the vocal cords to the interarytenoid notch. A POGO score of 0% corresponds with no visualization of laryngeal structures.
1 day
Cormack - Lehane grade
Time Frame: 1 day
self-reported percentage the vocal cord visualization using the Cormack-Lehane grading (grade 1-4)
1 day
ease of use
Time Frame: 1 day
To access subjective opinions about the difficulty of the each intubation method, participants were asked to give a rating on a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 100 (extremely difficult).
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jacek Smereka, PhD, Wroclaw Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 7, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ETI_2018_DL1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Clinical Trials on Standard double-lumen tube

Subscribe