- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03561012
Team-Based Goals and Incentives for Community-Based Health Workers to Promote Maternal and Child Health in Bihar, India
Use of Team-Based Goals and Incentives to Improve the Performance of Community-Based Health Workers in Promoting Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health and Nutrition Behaviors in Bihar, India: A Cluster Randomized Trial
This study is designed to evaluate the impact of team-based goals and performance-based incentives for community-based health workers on health-promoting behaviors among women related to reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition in Bihar, India.
The intervention was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and implemented from 2012 to 2014. Health sub-centers in the catchment areas of five blocks (sub-districts) of the district of Bengusarai were randomly assigned to treatment or control arms (38 sub-centers were assigned to each). Data were collected in the Intervention and Control areas from mothers of infants 0-12 months at baseline and at 2.5-year follow-up, to assess the intervention's effects on quality and quantity of FLW home visits, postnatal health behaviors, and among older infants/toddlers, complementary feeding and vaccination. Difference in difference analyses were used to assess outcome effects in this quasi experimental study.
The TBGI intervention was implemented in areas where the BMGF-funded Ananya program (official title: Bihar Family Health Initiative) was also being implemented. Thus, the impact is of the [TBGI intervention + Ananya] versus [Ananya alone]. The Ananya program was developed and implemented via a partnership of BMGF and the Government of Bihar. The ultimate purpose of Ananya was to reduce maternal, newborn, and child mortality; fertility; and child undernutrition in Bihar, India. Ananya involved multi-level interventions designed to build front line health worker (FLW) capacities and reach to communities and households, as well as to strengthen public health facilities and quality of care to improve maternal and neonatal care and health behaviors, and thus survival. It was implemented from 2012 to 2014. Eight focal districts in western and central Bihar received Ananya, while 30 districts did not.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Mothers of infants 0-12 months residing in the catchment area of the subcenters (public health facilities)
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Control Arm
|
Standard of care
|
Experimental: Intervention arm
|
The intervention included 3 main components.
1) The intervention fostered a sense of team collective responsibility and solidarity (TEAM) by emphasizing the value of teamwork and front-line community health workers (FLWs) reciting a pledge at meetings to serve beneficiaries.
2) To establish goals and coverage targets related to maternal and child health outcomes (GOALs), 7 targets were identified related to delivery preparations, newborn care, exclusive breastfeeding, and family planning.
3) Small non-cash incentives were awarded to FLWs each quarter if their team met greater than 70% of the collective subcenter goals; incentives were most common cookware products (e.g., dish, cooking vessel, steamer).
Non-cash incentives also included a certificate of recognition for teams that met their targets in all quarters (INCENTIVES).
In the areas of the intervention and control arms, the Ananya program was also underway (see Brief Summary of the project).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
At least 2 antenatal home visits in final trimester
Time Frame: Up to 2.5 years
|
Assessed via self-report from representative sample of mothers of children aged 0-11 months.
|
Up to 2.5 years
|
At least one home visit within 24 hours of delivery, among women who had a home delivery
Time Frame: 2.5 year follow-up
|
Assessed via self-report from representative sample of mothers of children aged 0-11 months.
|
2.5 year follow-up
|
At least one home visit within 1 week of delivery
Time Frame: 2.5 year follow-up
|
Assessed via self-report from representative sample of mothers of children aged 0-11 months.
|
2.5 year follow-up
|
Complementary feeding home visit for women with infant 6-11 months old
Time Frame: 2.5 year follow-up
|
Assessed via self-report from representative sample of mothers of children aged 0-11 months.
|
2.5 year follow-up
|
Postpartum family planning home visits
Time Frame: 2.5 year follow-up
|
Assessed via self-report from representative sample of mothers of children aged 0-11 months.
|
2.5 year follow-up
|
Obtained phone number for delivery (Frontline worker's (FLW) number, number for private vehicle, number for ambulance, any of the above)
Time Frame: 2.5 year follow-up
|
Assessed via self-report from representative sample of mothers of children aged 0-11 months.
|
2.5 year follow-up
|
Received 90 IFA tablets
Time Frame: 2.5 year follow-up
|
Assessed via self-report from representative sample of mothers of children aged 0-11 months.
|
2.5 year follow-up
|
Immediate breastfeeding (within 1 hour of delivery)
Time Frame: 2.5 year follow-up
|
Assessed via self-report from representative sample of mothers of children aged 0-11 months.
|
2.5 year follow-up
|
Nothing applied to the cord after cutting
Time Frame: 2.5 year follow-up
|
Assessed via self-report from representative sample of mothers of children aged 0-11 months.
|
2.5 year follow-up
|
Infant age 6-11 months old ate cereal-based meal in previous day
Time Frame: 2.5 year follow-up
|
Assessed via self-report from representative sample of mothers of children aged 6-11 months.
|
2.5 year follow-up
|
Current use of any modern method of contraception:
Time Frame: 2.5 year follow-up
|
Assessed via self-report from representative sample of mothers of children aged 0-11 months.
|
2.5 year follow-up
|
Child age 6-11 months old received DPT3 vaccination
Time Frame: 2.5 year follow-up
|
Assessed via self-report from representative sample of mothers of children aged 6-11 months.
|
2.5 year follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy
-
Prevent Age Resort "Pervaya Liniya"RecruitingHealthy Aging | Healthy Diet | Healthy LifestyleRussian Federation
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy AdultsNetherlands
-
Yale UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth-related Benefits of Introducing Table Olives Into the Diet of Young Adults: Olives For HealthHealthy Diet | Healthy Lifestyle | Healthy Nutrition | CholesterolUnited States
-
Hasselt UniversityRecruitingHealthy | Healthy AgingBelgium
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.Syneos HealthCompleted
-
Galera Therapeutics, Inc.Syneos HealthCompletedHealthy | Healthy VolunteersAustralia
-
University of PennsylvaniaActive, not recruitingHealthy | Healthy AgingUnited States
-
Chalmers University of TechnologyGöteborg UniversityCompletedHealthy | Nutrition, HealthySweden
-
University of ManitobaNot yet recruitingHealthy | Healthy Diet
Clinical Trials on Team-Based Goals and Incentives
-
St.Paul's Hospital, KoreaCompletedTobacco Use DisorderKorea, Republic of
-
University of PennsylvaniaNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedSedentary Employees
-
Arizona State UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedPhysical Activity | Behavior | GoalsUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruitingBrain Injuries, Traumatic | Executive DysfunctionUnited States
-
Abramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Active, not recruitingPhysical ActivityUnited States
-
Peking UniversityNot yet recruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Hypertension | Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
-
University of PennsylvaniaRobert Wood Johnson FoundationCompletedPhysical ActivityUnited States
-
The Miriam HospitalUnknown
-
UConn HealthPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; University of ConnecticutRecruiting
-
West Virginia UniversityCompleted