Open Spina Bifida Fetoscopic Repair Project

June 7, 2018 updated by: Gerardo Sepúlveda González, Medicina Perinatal Alta Especialidad, México
The aim of the study is to assess a new fetal surgery approach to repair open spina bifida. The fetal group hypothesis is to perform a minimally invasive procedure using a fetoscopic technique in order to access to amniotic cavity and make the endoscopic repair. This approach will allow investigators to make the closure of the defect and avoid the use of an hysterotomy, reducing the risk of maternal complications as uterine dehiscence (rupture), hemorrhage and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), the patient also will be able to have a vaginal delivery.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Spina bifida can be a devastating neurological congenital anomaly . It results from incomplete middleline closure of the neural tube between 22 and 28 embryological days. Its incidence is approximately 1 per 1,000 / 2,000 births. It is considered the most common congenital anomaly of the central nervous system that is compatible with life, 90% of the defects are lumbar and sacral.

  1. The most frequent form is myelomeningocele (MMC), characterized by the extrusion of the spinal cord into a sac filled with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and is associated with lower limb paralysis and bowel and bladder neurological dysfunction.
  2. The majority of MMCs can be diagnosed between before 20 weeks. MMC is associated with Chiari II malformation, which includes a constellation of anomalies such as hindbrain herniation, brainstem abnormalities, low-lying venous sinuses and a small posterior fossa.The Chiari II malformation can have deleterious effects on motor, cranial nerve and cognitive functions. Postnatally most MMC patients develop hydrocephalus and require a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Shunts require lifelong monitoring and have a high failure rate due to infection, obstruction, and fracture.

Experimental studies using animal models have shown that prenatal coverage of a spina bifida-like lesion can preserve neurological function and reduce or reverse hindbrain herniation.These studies suggest a "two-hit" hypothesis in which the ultimate neurologic deficit results from a combination of the failure of normal neural-tube closure (first hit) with secondary spinal cord injury resulting from prolonged exposure of sensitive neural elements to the amniotic fluid (second hit mechanism).

Based on this hypothesis, open fetal surgical repair of MMC was proposed, and the recent publication of the NICHD sponsored randomized controlled trial demonstrated clear neonatal benefit of open in-utero fetal surgical repair of MMC. The study showed a reduction in the incidence of hydrocephalus and in the radiographic severity of hindbrain herniation (relative risk: 0.67; 95% confidence interval: 0.56-0.81).

Open in-utero fetal surgery is not without risk and the NICHD study (MOMS Trial) showed an elevation in maternal-fetal morbidity/risk when compared to the postnatally treated group, including higher risk for chorioamniotic separation (26% vs. 0%, respectively), maternal pulmonary edema (6% vs. 0%), oligohydramnios (21% vs. 0%), placental abruption (6% vs. 0%), spontaneous membrane rupture (46%; RR: 6.15; 95% CI: 2.75-13.78), spontaneous labor (38%; RR: 2.80, 95%CI: 1.51-5.18), maternal blood transfusion (9%; RR: 7.18; 95%CI: 0.90-57.01), and preterm delivery before 34 weeks (46%; RR: 9.2; 95%CI: 3.81-22.19). The reason for the increased incidence of these complications is related to the nature of the open fetal procedure, which involves a multi-faceted invasive approach including maternal laparotomy, large hysterotomy with uterine edge stapling, and open fetal repair of the spina bifida defect that may involve manipulation and exposure of the fetus for a significant amount of time.

Fetal endoscopic surgery has progressed rapidly over the past decades and the investigators are now able to perform a number of intricate procedures inside the uterus with specially designed instruments. These procedures include laser therapy for Twin-twin-transfusion syndrome, fetal cystoscopy and fulguration of posterior urethral valves, release of amniotic bands, and placement of various shunts and balloons inside fetal structures and cavities (peritoneal, pleural, cardiac, and trachea).

Fetoscopy offers a less invasive therapeutic option that could reduce a number of the morbidities (both maternal and fetal) related to open fetal procedures.

A few animal studies and some clinical human experience with fetoscopic repair of MMC have been reported showing the feasibility of covering the defect with a patch and sealant, or even in performing a full repair. These repairs have been accomplished using at least two (and sometimes more) entry ports through the uterine wall. Kohl et al. in Germany, have demonstrated the feasibility of performing a complete percutaneous fetoscopic repair of MMC using carbon dioxide to distend the uterus and provide a dry working area for the surgeon to perform the repair.

These investigators described a two-layer covering technique using an absorbable patch (Durasis, Cook, Germany) and sutures. However, while they showed that the procedure is feasible, their percutaneous technique with complete two layer surgical closure of the defect using sutures was associated with prolonged operative time and significant maternal and obstetrical morbidities.

Fetoscopy in a CO2 gas filled uterus has been recently reported by groups in Bonn, Germany (Kohl et al) and Sao Paulo, Brazil (Pedreira et al). The fetoscopic technique the investigators use has been developed and tested in a fetal sheep model of MMC by the investigators group and others (Peiro et al). This fetoscopy technique has now been employed by a group of investigators, in human fetal surgery cases in Houston, Texas, Monterrey México and in Shiraz, Iran showing its feasibility and applicability to the human uterus and fetus, and demonstrating an improved degree of flexibility in terms of access to the fetus regardless of placental location. The technique is designed to decrease the maternal risks of open uterus fetal surgery while maintaining a similar level of fetal benefit as seen in the MOMS trial.

The investigators technique employs general deep anesthesia and an open abdomen/exteriorized (but closed) uterus methodology that allows the minimally invasive closure of the fetal neural tube using the same closed skin repair currently employed at another US centers using the open uterus approach. The technique employs a novel approach to low pressure uterine distention using the same carbon dioxide gas 8-12 mmHg that others attempting fetoscopic repair have used, but employing a much lower gas flow rate and pressure. In addition, this technique allows a significantly quicker neural tube repair because of improved access to the fetus, ability to manipulate the fetus into the required position, and superior port placement resulting from the exteriorized maternal uterus.

The technique consist in a three access ports (10 French each) and these can be sutured into the uterus allowing a closed seal and minimizing gas leakage. Finally, a 2-3 mm Storz surgical sets enables a full surgical repair to be performed via a fetoscopic approach.

There have been reports about sheep model, with dual access port fetoscopic neural tube closure using a 12 french cannula, a second 9 french cannula, a cover patch, and a medical sealant with similar results to that seen with open fetal surgical repair in the same sheep model. Using the knowledge and expertise gained with more than 3 years of experience in fetoscopic sheep surgery, Dr. Peiro has now performed 8 minimally invasive repairs on human patients in Barcelona (Vall D'Hebron Hospital, Instituto Nacional de Perinatologia, Mexico City, Mexico). Also there have been reports at Texas Childrens Hospital ( Belfort) using two ports technique in order to successfully repair the defect.

The neurosurgical repair proposed in this protocol will involves release of the placode, dissection of the surrounding skin and attempted primary closure of the defect using available skin. In those cases where the investigators are able to complete the procedure with full skin closure of the defect, the only difference between the open uterus procedure and the fetoscopic procedure, will be that the surgery will be done fetoscopically rather than through an open uterine incision. If the investigator group is unable to close the skin primarily despite best fetoscopic efforts, the option of performing/completing the repair as an open procedure exists and will be offered to the patient previous counselling of the maternal morbidity. The patient is monitored in hospital until ready for discharge.

Approximately 6 weeks after the surgery a post-procedure fetal MRI will be performed. If there is evidence of good closure of the neural tube defect and reversal of the Chiari II malformation, a vaginal delivery can be attempted based on obstetric criteria. Patients will be followed in person every 3-4 months after birth to 12 months at the Spina Bifida Clinic at Christus Muguerza Alta Especialidad. Remaining visits will be yearly up to 5 years. If this is not possible, questionnaire(s) will be mailed to the participants and records will be requested from the treating neurosurgeon on this same schedule.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nuevo Leon
      • Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Christus Muguerza Alta Especialidad
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. - Pregnant women - maternal age 18 years old or older and capable of consenting for their own participation in the study
  2. - Singleton pregnancy
  3. - Myelomeningocele with the upper boundary located between T1 and S1
  4. - Evidence of hindbrain herniation (confirmed on MRI) to have Arnold Chiari type II malformation)
  5. - Absence of chromosomal abnormalities and associated anomalies.
  6. - Gestational age at the time of the procedure will be between 19 to 26 weeks
  7. - Normal karyotype and / or normal chromosomal microarray (CMA) by invasive testing (amniocentesis or CVS). If there is a balanced translocation with normal CMA with no other anomalies the candidate can be included. Patients declining invasive testing will be excluded.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. - Fetal anomaly unrelated to myelomeningocele
  2. - Sever kyphosis
  3. - Increased risk for preterm labor included short cervical length (<15 mm), history of incompetent cervix with or without cerclage, and previous preterm birth
  4. - Placental abnormalities (previa, abruption, accreta) known at time of enrollment
  5. - A prepregnancy body mass index > or equal to 35 Kg/m2
  6. - Contraindications to surgery including previous hysterotomy (whether from a previous classical cesarean, uterine anomaly such as an arcuate or bicornuate uterus, mayor myomectomy resection or previous fetal surgery) in active uterine segment.
  7. - Technical limitations precluding fetoscopic surgery, such as uterine fibroids, fetal membrane separation, and uterine anomalies.
  8. - Maternal fetal Rh isoimmunization, Kell sensitization or neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia affecting the current pregnancy
  9. - Maternal HIV, Hepatitis B/C status positive
  10. - Maternal medical condition that is a contraindication to surgery or anesthesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Fetoscopy
All participants will undergo fetoscopic repair of open spina bifida
Performing a minimally invasive procedure using a fetoscopic technique in order to access to amniotic cavity and make the endoscopic repair of the fetal neural tube defect.
Other Names:
  • Fetal surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Capability to achieve successful closure of the myelomeningocele by fetoscopic surgery
Time Frame: Time of procedure (day 0)
Binary variable (yes/no) describing if the neural tube defect (myelomeningocele) has been successfully closed (placed dissected and dropped into the open spinal canal, cystic tissue resected and edges closed to the midline), by fetoscopic surgery, and without conversion to open surgery.
Time of procedure (day 0)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgery time (minutes)
Time Frame: Time of procedure in minutes (day of surgery / day 0)
Time between the skin incision and skin closure
Time of procedure in minutes (day of surgery / day 0)
Delivery gestational age (weeks and days)
Time Frame: From surgery and up to 21 weeks after the procedure
Gestational age at birth
From surgery and up to 21 weeks after the procedure
Premature rupture of membranes PROM (weeks and days)
Time Frame: Between the surgery to 37 weeks of pregnancy (18 weeks after repair)
Amniotic fluid leakage before onset of labor
Between the surgery to 37 weeks of pregnancy (18 weeks after repair)
Chorioamnionitis
Time Frame: Between the surgery and delivery (up to 20 weeks after repair)
The presence or absence of an intrauterine infection
Between the surgery and delivery (up to 20 weeks after repair)
Mode of delivery
Time Frame: Delivery, up to 21 weeks after surgery
Vaginal or cesarean delivery
Delivery, up to 21 weeks after surgery
Neurodevelopment evaluation by Bayley Scales of infant development II
Time Frame: Up to 24 months after birth
Score of the Mental Developmental Index of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II at 24 months of age. The score ranges from 50 (minimum) to 150 (maximum). A score of <70 indicates severe developmental delay; 70-84 indicates moderate delay; >85 indicates no delay.
Up to 24 months after birth
Childhood motor function on physical examination
Time Frame: 24 months after birth
Difference between the anatomic upper border of the lesion level and motor function based on the physical examination at 24 months of age. A positive score of 2 indicates a functional level 2 vertebrae higher than lesion level. A score of -2 indicates a function level 2 vertebrae lower than the lesion level.
24 months after birth
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt
Time Frame: After birth and up to 12 months
Need for a cerebrospinal fluid shunt within the first year of life
After birth and up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myelomeningocele

Clinical Trials on Fetoscopy

Subscribe