Cardiovascular Effects of Acute Exercise Post-Stroke (ACES)

February 25, 2021 updated by: Ada Tang, McMaster University

Acute Effects of High-Intensity Interval Exercise vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Exercise on Arterial Stiffness in Chronic Stroke

There is an urgent need to reduce the impact of stroke by promoting optimal rehabilitation strategies that decrease the risk of stroke. Improving cardiovascular health following a stroke is a key rehabilitation strategy that has the potential to reduce the risk of a recurrent event.

Adverse cardiovascular events, including stroke, are often due to chronic atherosclerosis, which shows as increased arterial stiffness. Elevated arterial stiffness is prevalent in individuals with cardiovascular disease, is associated with markers of silent cerebrovascular disease and is a new marker for predicting cardiovascular risk. Cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs) are used to assess cardiorespiratory fitness. Novel CPET protocols have emerged for stroke, enabling safe and valid measurements of cardiorespiratory fitness. Cardiovascular exercise, typically performed through moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE), can improve function and fitness in individuals living with stroke and lower the risk of recurrent stroke. Recently, high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) has emerged as a potentially potent stimulus that may also lead to improvements in function and fitness. While HIIE has shown benefits in clinical and non-clinical populations, only a few small, preliminary studies have examined the effects of HIIE in individuals living with stroke, and most have primarily focused on examining the effects of HIIE on function and gait. No study has examined and compared the acute effects of a CPET, MICE and HIIE on arterial stiffness in stroke. This study will (1) examine the acute effects of a single session of this HIIE protocol compared to a CPET and a single session of MICE on arterial stiffness among individuals with chronic stroke, and (2) the feasibility of a high-intensity interval training exercise protocol previously found to be tolerable and effective in attaining high levels of exercise intensity in in these individuals.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Stroke is the leading cause of adult disability and the fourth leading cause of death in Canada, with an annual cost to the economy of $3.6 billion. There is an urgent need to reduce the impact of stroke by promoting optimal rehabilitation strategies that decrease the risk of stroke. Improving cardiovascular health following a stroke is a key rehabilitation strategy that has the potential to reduce the risk of a recurrent event. Adverse cardiovascular events, including stroke, are often due to chronic atherosclerosis. Amplified arterial stiffness is a sign of atherosclerosis which increases arterial wall stress and reduces coronary perfusion. Elevated arterial stiffness is prevalent in individuals with cardiovascular disease, is associated with markers of silent cerebrovascular disease and is a new marker for predicting cardiovascular risk. Cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs) are the gold standard for assessing cardiorespiratory fitness. In stroke, impairments in physical function may be present and limit individuals' ability to perform a CPET on traditional modes such as a cycle ergometer or treadmill. Thus, novel CPET protocols have been developed to allow individuals with stroke perform a fitness test safely and effectively. Cardiovascular exercise, typically performed through moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE), can improve function and fitness in individuals living with stroke and lower the risk of recurrent stroke. Recently, high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) has emerged as a potentially potent stimulus that may also lead to improvements in function and fitness. HIIE combines short bursts of high-intensity cardiovascular exercise with periods of rest or recovery, and allows individuals to achieve higher intensities of cardiovascular exercise that do not need to be maintained for a long period of time like MICE. In this way, HIIE has the potential to be an additional exercise strategy to enhance cardiovascular health post-stroke. While HIIE has shown benefits in clinical and non-clinical populations, only a few small, preliminary studies have examined the effects of HIIE in individuals living with stroke, and most have primarily focused on examining the effects of HIIE on function and gait.

While the chronic effects of exercise on arterial stiffness have been examined in stroke, no study has examined the acute effects of a CPET, MICE, or HIIE. Different exercise stimuli may elicit variable short-term influences on arterial stiffness in individuals who have had a stroke, but this has not been previously examined. The feasibility of HIIE for individuals with a broader range of functional abilities after stroke is also not well established.

This study will (1) compare the acute effects of a HIIE session to a CPET and a session of MICE on arterial stiffness and (2) examine the feasibility of a HIIE protocol in individuals with a broad range of abilities after stroke. The investigators anticipate that (1) arterial stiffness will be elevated to a greater degree immediately following HIIE compared to the CPET and MICE, and will remain elevated following 15 minutes post-exercise, and (2) both HIIE and MICE protocols will be safe and feasible for individuals with stroke (no occurrence of adverse events), however the HIIE protocol will allow participants to obtain and be able to sustain a higher level of exercise intensity, and therefore a higher heart rate, compared to MICE. Understanding the time course of changes in arterial stiffness following acute exercise may provide insight into vascular responses of HIIE and thus potential underlying physiological mechanisms of post-stroke exercise.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

4

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 1C7
        • McMaster University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 40-80 years of age
  • >6 months following first-ever, single stroke
  • Living in the community (not in an institutional setting)
  • Able to walk at least 10 meters (assistive devices permitted)
  • Able to follow commands.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals will be excluded if they present with:
  • Significant disability (a score >2 in the modified Rankin scale)
  • Class C or D American Heart Association Risk Scores
  • Any contraindications to exercise testing or training as set forth by the American College of Sports Medicine Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (ACSM, 2014)
  • Any other neurological or musculoskeletal condition or co-morbidity that would preclude safe exercise participation
  • Pain worsened with exercise
  • Any cognitive, communication, or behavioral concerns that could limit safe exercise involvement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exercise
All participants will perform 3 exercise sessions: one session to assess their cardiorespiratory fitness, one session on moderate-intensity continuous exercise and one session of high-intensity interval exercise
Participants will perform a graded cardiopulmonary exercise test to asses their cardiorespiratory fitness. It will also provide a peak exercise stimulus to examine acute changes in arterial stiffness, and to prescribe both moderate intensity continuous exercise and high intensity interval exercise.
Participants will perform a 30-minute session of moderate-intensity continuous exercise.
1 week later, participants will perform a 19-minute session of high-intensity interval exercise.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Arterial Stiffness
Time Frame: Resting before exercise, immediately following (within 5 minutes) of exercise cessation, and continuously for 15 minutes post exercise.
Arterial stiffness will be measured at rest, immediately after each exercise stimulus, and continuously for 15 minutes after each exercise stimulus to assess change in this measure post-acute exercise. Arterial stiffness will be measured using the criterion standard for measuring central arterial stiffness, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). Arterial stiffness will be assessed non-invasively through applanation tonometry. cfPWV is calculated as cfPWV=D (meters)/Δt (seconds), where Δt is the pulse transit time between carotid and femoral arteries and D the distance between the two arteries.
Resting before exercise, immediately following (within 5 minutes) of exercise cessation, and continuously for 15 minutes post exercise.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events [Safety]
Time Frame: During active engagement of HIIE and MICE protocols, and within 7 days later
Incidence of adverse events that occur during or after HIIE and MICE
During active engagement of HIIE and MICE protocols, and within 7 days later
Time spent at prescribed heart rate intensity [Feasibility]
Time Frame: During active engagement of HIIE and MICE protocols
The total time spent at the prescribed heart rate intensity for each protocol will be determined, i.e. # minutes during the 30-minute MICE and 19- minute HIIE protocols.
During active engagement of HIIE and MICE protocols

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ada Tang, PhD, McMaster University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 27, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Cardiovascular

Clinical Trials on Cardiopulmonary exercise test

Subscribe