The Effect of Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery on Innate Immune Homeostasis. (RECOVER-PLUS)

October 27, 2021 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

The Effectiveness of Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in Preserving Innate Immune Homeostasis by Reducing Peritoneal Mesothelial Cell Injury.

Substudy of the RECOVER trial (a randomised controlled trial comparing the effect of low pressure pneumoperitoneum with deep neuromuscular block versus normal pressure pneumoperitoneum with moderate neuromuscular block during laparoscopic colorectal surgery on early quality of recovery) investigating innate immune homeostasis after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: increased intra-abdominal pressure can cause peritoneal mesothelial cell injury either directly or by compression of the capillary vessels, causing a variable degree of ischemia reperfusion injury. The immune system can identify damage to host cells by recognising Danger-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs) that are released upon cell death in an uncontrolled fashion, such as during surgical trauma. DAMPs elicit an immune response similar to the response to invading pathogens and induce an anti-inflammatory immune response strongly related to postoperative recovery, infectious complications and mortality. Low pressure PNP is associated with lower levels of serum pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and better preservation of innate immune function.

Objective: to establish the relationship between the use of low pressure pneumoperitoneum with deep neuromuscular blockade and innate immune function after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Study design: a multi-center, blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial.

Study population: adult individuals scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery with a primary colonic anastomosis.

Intervention: participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to either the experimental group (group A): low pressure PNP (8 mmHg) with deep NMB (PTC 1-2) or the control group (group B): normal pressure PNP (12 mmHg) with moderate NMB (TOF count 1-2).

Primary endpoint: mononuclear cell responsiveness ex-vivo as reflected by TNFα release upon LPS stimulation.

Secondary endpoints: mononuclear cell responsiveness ex-vivo as reflected by IL-6, IL-10 and IL-1beta release upon LPS stimulation. Peritoneal mesothelial hypoxia as reflected by peritoneal HIF1α mRNA expression, histological peritoneal mesothelial cell injury and plasma levels of DAMPs and cytokines.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6532SZ
        • Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled for laparoscopic colorectal surgery with a primary anastomosis
  • Obtained informed consent
  • Age over 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient control of the Dutch language to read the patient information and to fill out the questionnaires
  • Primary colostomy
  • Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Chronic use of analgesics or psychotropic drugs
  • Use of NSAIDs shorter than 5 days before surgery
  • Known or suspected allergy to rocuronium of sugammadex
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Indication for rapid sequence induction
  • Severe liver- or renal disease (creatinine clearance <30ml/min)
  • BMI >35 kg/m²
  • Deficiency of vitamin K dependent clotting factors or coagulopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low pressure PNP, deep NMB
Low pressure pneumoperitoneum of 8 mmHg with deep neuromuscular block (post tetanic count of 1-2) reached by titration with continuous infusion of Rocuronium bromide.
Lowering intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopic surgery
Other Names:
  • Low intra-abdominal pressure
Deep (PTC 1-2) versus moderate (TOF count 1-2) neuromuscular block
Other Names:
  • Deep muscle relaxation
Active Comparator: Normal pressure PNP, moderate NMB
Normal pressure pneumoperitoneum of 12 mmHg with moderate neuromuscular block (TOF count of 1-2) reached by titration with bolus or continuous infusion of a low dose of Rocuronium bromide.
Deep (PTC 1-2) versus moderate (TOF count 1-2) neuromuscular block
Other Names:
  • Deep muscle relaxation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mononuclear cell responsiveness ex vivo
Time Frame: Before surgery, 24 and 72 hours after surgery
TNFalpha release upon LPS stimulation
Before surgery, 24 and 72 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mononuclear cell responsiveness ex-vivo
Time Frame: Before surgery, 24 and 72 hours after surgery
IL-6, IL-10 and IL-1beta release upon LPS stimulation
Before surgery, 24 and 72 hours after surgery
Serum DAMPs and cytokines
Time Frame: Before surgery, at the end of surgery and 24 hours after surgery
Danger associated molecular patterns, TNFalpha, IL-6 and IL-10
Before surgery, at the end of surgery and 24 hours after surgery
HLA-DR mRNA expression
Time Frame: Before surgery, 24 and 72 hours after surgery
MHC-II antigen presenting immune receptor
Before surgery, 24 and 72 hours after surgery
Peritoneal histology and HIF1alpha expression
Time Frame: At the start and end of surgery
Histology and HIF1alpha mRNA expression of a peritoneal biopsy
At the start and end of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michiel C Warlé, MD, PhD, Radboud University Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Kim I Albers, MD, Radboud University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 24, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumoperitoneum

Clinical Trials on Low pressure pneumoperitoneum

3
Subscribe