Vascular Changes of Rotator Cuff Repair Augmented With a Whole Blood Fibrin Clot

May 3, 2022 updated by: Christopher Proctor, Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital
The goal of this study is to assess whether undergoing surgical repair of the rotator cuff with the additional intervention of whole blood fibrin clot will improve rotator cuff vascularization at the bone-tendon interface repair site and patient outcomes compared to those who do not receive the whole blood fibrin clot intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patient outcomes after rotator cuff repair vary greatly and depend on the size of the tear itself. Researchers have identified a number of devices that can be used to reinforce the surgical repair and enhance the structure and function of both the muscles and tendons (Jo et al., 2011; Randelli, Arrigoni, Ragone, MEng, Aliprandi, Cabitza, 2011; Proctor, 2014). Reinforcement patches have been used to help improve surgical outcomes, including: allograft rotator cuff, human cadaveric skin, pig and bovine skin, equine pericardium, and porcine intestinal submucosa (Randelli, Arrigoni, Ragone, MEng, Aliprandi, Cabitza, 2011). Although synthetic patches have also shown some effectiveness, these patches do not provide biologic augmentation of the tendon repair (Jo et al., 2011).

Additionally, there has been some research examining the effectiveness of using platelet-rich plasma therapy to help repair both rotator cuff tendinopathy and tears. Platelets play an important role in the healing process and it has been theorized that exposing inflamed or healing tissue to higher densities of platelets can contribute to less pain, better range of motion (ROM), and overall healing (Pandey et al., 2016). The consensus on this type of therapy has shown inconclusive results, however. For example, research by Jo et al. (2011) found no significant change in clinical recovery in respect to pain or ROM compared to a control group. Alternatively, Pandey et al. (2016) found significant improvements in both pain and ROM scores as well as decreased re-tear rates in the plasma-rich protein treatment group. These and other similar studies utilized different methodologies for patient populations (tendinopathy versus full tears, etc.), treatment timing, formulation of platelet-rich plasma or whole blood fibrin clot, and time of follow-up. Further research is needed to identify what treatments, if any, in the field of platelet-rich plasma are most beneficial for patients with rotator cuff tears. Recent research has demonstrated that whole blood fibrin clots concentrate 98% of available platelets and release growth factors including vascular endothelial growth factor over two weeks (Siegel, Clevenger, Proctor, Clegg, & Proctor, 2017). However, clinical evidence indicating the effect of whole blood fibrin clots on the healing of repaired torn rotator cuffs is lacking (Jo et al., 2011). The goal of this study is to assess whether undergoing surgical repair of the rotator cuff with the additional intervention of whole blood fibrin clot will improve rotator cuff vascularization at the bone-tendon interface repair site and patient outcomes compared to those who do not receive the whole blood fibrin clot intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Santa Barbara, California, United States, 93101
        • De La Vina Surgery Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 69 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1) Presence of ultrasonographic or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) documented rotator cuff tear confirmed at surgery to be a medium to large-sized rotator cuff tear (> 1 cm), which requires intervention due to persistent difficulty in elevation of affected shoulder and/or pain; 2) ability to give informed consent for procedure, rehabilitation, and regular clinical and radiologic follow-up for a minimum period of 6 most post-surgery; and have 3) preoperative blood platelet counts >150,000/microliter.

Exclusion Criteria:

1) they have a type III subscapularis tear and above due to different rehabilitation protocol; 2) massive, partial, or traumatic cuff tears; 3) partial or incomplete repairs; 4) is a chronic smoker or patient with Parkinson's disease; 5) have a condition that may hinder healing or attending follow-up visits (e.g., diabetes, immunocompromised status, chemotherapy treatment, chronic steroid use); and 6) age >70.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Patients in the control arm will receive standard of care for their rotator cuff tear, and will not receive the additional whole blood fibrin clot.
Experimental: Treatment
Patients in the control arm will receive standard of care for their rotator cuff tear, in addition to, the whole blood fibrin clot.
For all patients assigned to the treatment group, 35mL of whole blood will be obtained during surgery by an anesthesiologist. 5 mL of the blood will be sent for pre-clot formation cell count evaluation for platelets, red blood cells and white blood cells. The remaining 30mL will be placed into a sterile container with a sintered glass cylinder supported by the lid for fibrin clot formation. The clot formation cups will be placed on a rotator at room temperature for 10 minutes at 125rpm. The fibrin clot will be removed and 5mL of the post-clot serum sent for post-clot formation cell count evaluation for platelets, red blood cells, and white blood cells.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vascularity Index
Time Frame: Assessed 6 weeks postoperatively.
Vascularity or the structural outcome will be assessed at 6 weeks postoperatively using the vascularity index scoring system described in Zumstein et al., (2014).
Assessed 6 weeks postoperatively.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at 1 week, 3 weeks, and then at 3 and 6 months.
A 10-point pain scale for pain at night, with 0 being no pain and 10 being unbearable.
Assessed at baseline and at 1 week, 3 weeks, and then at 3 and 6 months.
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, and 3 and 6 months.
A 21 - item questionnaire that measures quality of life for patients with rotator cuff disease.
Assessed at baseline, and 3 and 6 months.
Veterans Rand (VR-12)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, and 3 and 6 months.
A generic quality of life measure that consists of 12 items.
Assessed at baseline, and 3 and 6 months.
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and at 3 and 6 month.
A 100-point scale which measures pain (up to 50 points) and function (up to 50 points). A higher score indicates less pain and better function.
Assessed at baseline and at 3 and 6 month.
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation Score (SANE)
Time Frame: Assessed at 3 and 6 months.
A single -item questionnaire that asks "What percentage of normal is your shoulder?" A rating scale from 0% to 100% is given with higher being better.
Assessed at 3 and 6 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Results on the aggregate of the sample will be published.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tear

Clinical Trials on Whole Blood Fibrin Clot

3
Subscribe