Platinum-based Chemotherapy With Atezolizumab and Niraparib in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (ANITA)

A Phase III Randomized, Double-blinded Trial of Platinum-based Chemotherapy With or Without Atezolizumab Followed by Niraparib Maintenance With or Without Atezolizumab in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian, Tubal or Peritoneal Cancer and Platinum Treatment-free Interval (TFIp) >6 Months

Atezolizumab in this study is expected to have a positive benefit-risk profile for the treatment of patients with platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer. Of interest, atezolizumab is being investigated also in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in second line (2L)/ third line (3L) platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients in ATALANTE (NCT02891824), which also includes bevacizumab in the combination. The study is proceeding as expected after >100 patients enrolled and under independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) supervision.

Platinum-containing therapy is considered the treatment of choice for patients with platinum-sensitive relapse. However the duration of response and the prolongation of the progression free interval with chemotherapy are usually brief, among other because these chemotherapy regimens cannot be continued until progression as they are associated with neurological, renal and hematological toxicity and cannot generally be tolerated for more than about 6 to 9 cycles.

Niraparib received FDA approval in March 2017 as maintenance treatment of adult patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer who are in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Recently, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has also approved niraparib as maintenance monotherapy. Despite the progress brought about by niraparib, there is a need for a more effective treatment to extend the progression free interval in this patient population. The combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-death protein 1 (anti-PD1) or anti-death protein ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) has a compelling rationale to this aim, especially under the light of the emerging clinical data of this combination.

The use of atezolizumab concurrent to platinum-containing chemotherapy followed by niraparib as maintenance therapy after completion of chemotherapy, as per normal clinical practice, may provide further benefit to patients in terms of prolonging the progression free interval and increasing the interval between lines of chemotherapy, hence delaying further hospitalization and the cumulative toxicities associated with chemotherapy. Additionally, preliminary studies with atezolizumab suggest an acceptable tolerability profile for long term clinical use in recurrent ovarian cancer patients and other indications.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

414

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Charleroi, Belgium
        • Grand Hôpital de Charleroi
      • Leuven, Belgium
        • UZ Leuven
      • Liège, Belgium
        • CHU de Liège, site Sart Tilman
      • Mons, Belgium
        • CHU Ambroise Pare
      • Namur, Belgium
        • CHU UCL Namur site St. Elisabeth
      • Angers, France, 49055
        • ICO - Paul Paupin - ANGERS
      • Besançon, France, 25000
        • CHU Besançon
      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • Institut Bergonié
      • Caen, France, 14000
        • Centre Francois Baclesse
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63011
        • Centre Jean Perrin
      • Lyon, France, 69008
        • Centre Leon Berard
      • Marseille, France, 13009
        • Institut Paoli Calmettes
      • Montpellier, France, 34298
        • ICM Val D'Aurelle
      • Nice, France, 06100
        • Centre Antoine Lacassagne
      • Nîmes, France, 30900
        • ONCOGARD - Institut de Cancérologie du Gard
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou
      • Paris, France, 75020
        • Hopital Tenon
      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Hopital Cochin
      • Paris, France, 75020
        • Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses-Croix Saint Simon
      • Plérin Cedex, France, 22198
        • HPCA Cario
      • Saint-Cloud, France, 92210
        • Institut Curie - Hopital Claudius Régaud
      • Saint-Cloud, France, 92210
        • Institut Curie - Hôpital René Huguenin- SAINT CLOUD
      • Saint-Herblain, France, 44800
        • ICO Centre Rene Gauducheau
      • Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France, 54519
        • Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
      • Villejuif, France, 94800
        • Gustave Roussy
      • Bad Homburg, Germany
        • Hochtaunus-Kliniken
      • Dresden, Germany
        • Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
      • Essen, Germany
        • Kliniken Essen-Mitte
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Mammazentrum Hamburg am Krankenhaus Jerusalem
      • Hannover, Germany
        • Diakovere Krankenhaus
      • Kulmbach, Germany
        • Klinikum Kulmbach
      • Mannheim, Germany, 68167
        • Universitätsklinikum Mannheim
      • Münster, Germany
        • Universitatsklinikum Munster
      • Nordhausen, Germany
        • MVZ Nordhausen
      • Oldenburg, Germany
        • Klinikum Oldenburg AöR
      • Rosenheim, Germany
        • RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim
      • Tübingen, Germany
        • Universitatsklinikum Tubingen
      • Ulm, Germany
        • Universitätsfrauenklinik Ulm
      • Wiesbaden, Germany
        • Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden
      • Brescia, Italy
        • Spedali Civili
      • Lecco, Italy
        • ASST Lecco
      • Milano, Italy
        • Istituto Europeo di Oncologia
      • Padova, Italy
        • I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Oncologico Veneto
      • Reggio Emilia, Italy
        • Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova
      • Torino, Italy
        • AO Città della Salute e della Scienza- Ospedale Sant'Anna
      • Torino, Italy
        • Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I
      • A Coruña, Spain
        • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña
      • Badalona, Spain
        • Ico Badalona
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • H. Clinic Barcelona
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital de la Vall d'Hebron
      • Cordoba, Spain
        • H Reina Sofía Cordoba
      • Girona, Spain
        • ICO Girona
      • Hospitalet del Llobregat, Spain
        • ICO Hospitalet
      • León, Spain
        • Hospital de Leon
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Gregorio Marañón
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario 12 de octubre
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Clínico San Carlos
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Clínica Universitaria de Navarra
      • Murcia, Spain
        • H Morales Meseguer
      • Málaga, Spain
        • Complejo Hospitalario Regional de Málaga
      • Palma De Mallorca, Spain
        • Hospital Son Llatzer
      • Sevilla, Spain
        • Hospital Virgen del Rocío
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
      • Valencia, Spain
        • H La Fe de Valencia
      • Zaragoza, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
    • Barcelona
      • Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital de Sabadell
    • Navarra
      • Pamplona, Navarra, Spain, 31008
        • Clinica Universidad de Navarra

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients ≥ 18 years old
  2. Life expectancy ≥3 months
  3. Signed informed consent and ability to comply with treatment and follow-up
  4. Histologically confirmed diagnosis (cytology alone excluded) of high- grade serous or endometrioid ovarian, primary peritoneal or tubal carcinoma.
  5. Breast Cancer (BRCA) mutational status is known (germline or somatic)
  6. Relapsed disease more than 6 months after the last platinum dose
  7. No more than 2 prior lines of chemotherapy are allowed, and the last one must contain a platinum-based regimen
  8. At least one measurable lesion to assess response by RECIST v1.1 criteria.
  9. Mandatory de novo tumor biopsy (collected within 3 months prior to randomization) sent to HistoGene X as a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sample for PD-L1 status determination for randomization. The inclusion of patients with non informative tissue PD-L1 status will be capped to 10% of the whole study population:

    • If the mandatory de novo biopsy is technically not possible or failed to produce enough representative tumor tissue, an FFPE sample from archival tissue may be acceptable after approval of the sponsor.
    • Bone metastases, fine needle aspiration, brushing, cCell pellet from pleural effusion, or ascites or lavage are not acceptable.
  10. Two additional tumour samples are needed: Archival tumor sample must be available for exploratory PD-L1 testing in archival tissue and archival or "de novo" tissue sample for biomarkers must also be available.
  11. Performance status determined by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-1
  12. Normal organ and bone marrow function:

    • Haemoglobin ≥10.0 g/dL
    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1.5 x 109/L
    • Lymphocyte count ≥0.5 × 109/L
    • Platelet count ≥100 x 109/L
    • Total bilirubin ≤1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN)
    • Serum albumin ≥2.5 g/dL
    • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤2.5 x ULN, unless liver metastases are present in which case they must be ≤5 x ULN
    • Serum creatinine ≤1.5 x institutional ULN or calculated creatinine clearance ≥ 30 mL/min using the Cockcroft-Gault equation
    • Patients not receiving anticoagulant medication must have an International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≤1.5 and an Activated ProThrombin Time (aPTT) ≤1.5 x ULN.
  13. Negative Test Results for Hepatitis.
  14. Toxicities related to previous treatments must be recovered to < grade 2
  15. Female participants must be postmenopausal or surgically sterile or otherwise have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days of the first study treatment and agree to abstain from heterosexual intercourse or use single or combined contraceptive methods.
  16. Participant must agree to not donate blood during the study or for 90 days after the last dose of study treatment.
  17. Participant must agree to not breastfeed during the study or for 180 days after the last dose of study treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-epithelial tumor of the ovary, the fallopian tube or the peritoneum.
  2. Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential or low grade
  3. Other malignancy within the last 5 years except curatively treated non-melanoma skin cancer, in situ cancer of the cervix and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
  4. Major surgery within 4 weeks of starting study treatment or patients who have not completely recovered (Grade ≥ 2) from the effects of any major surgery at randomization
  5. Core biopsy or other minor surgical procedure, excluding placement of a vascular access device, within 7 days prior to Day 1, Cycle 1
  6. Administration of other chemotherapy drugs, anticancer therapy or anti-neoplastic hormonal therapy, or treatment with other investigational agents or devices within 28 days prior to randomization, or within a time interval less than at least 5 half-lives of the investigational agent, whichever is shorter, or anticipation to do it during the trial treatment period (non-investigational hormonal replacement therapy is permitted)
  7. Palliative radiotherapy (e.g., for pain or bleeding) within 6 weeks prior to randomization or patients who have not completely recovered (Grade ≥ 2) from the effects of previous radiotherapy
  8. Current or recent (within 10 days prior to randomization) chronic use of aspirin (>325 mg/day) or clopidogrel (>75 mg/day)
  9. Clinically significant (e.g. active) cardiovascular disease
  10. Resting ECG with corrected QT interval (QTc) >470 msec on 2 or more time points within a 24 hour period or family history of long QT syndrome
  11. Left ventricular ejection fraction defined by multigated acquisition/echocardiogram (MUGA/ECHO) below the institutional lower limit of normal
  12. History or clinical suspicion of brain metastases or spinal cord compression. CT/MRI of the brain is mandatory (within 4 weeks prior to randomization) in case of suspected brain metastases. Spinal MRI is mandatory (within 4 weeks prior to randomization) in case of suspected spinal cord compression
  13. History or evidence upon neurological examination of central nervous system (CNS) disorders (e.g. uncontrolled epileptic seizures) unless adequately treated with standard medical therapy
  14. Current, clinically relevant bowel obstruction, including sub-occlusive disease, related to underlying disease
  15. Uncontrolled tumor-related pain
  16. Uncontrolled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites requiring recurrent drainage procedures (once monthly or more frequently). Patients with indwelling catheters (e.g., PleurX) are allowed
  17. Uncontrolled hypercalcemia (>1.5 mmol/L ionized calcium or calcium >12 mg/dL or corrected serum calcium > ULN) or symptomatic hypercalcemia requiring continued use of bisphosphonate therapy or denosumab
  18. Evidence of any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding or laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of an investigational drug or puts the patient at high risk for treatment related complications
  19. Pregnant or lactating women
  20. Simultaneously receiving therapy in any interventional clinical trial
  21. Prior treatment with CD137 agonists or immune checkpoint stimulating or blockade therapies, such as anti-PD1, anti-PDL1 or anti-CTLA4 therapeutic antibodies
  22. Treatment with systemic immunostimulatory agents (including but not limited to interferon-alpha (IFN-α) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) within 4 weeks or five half-lives of the drug (whichever is shorter) prior to Cycle 1, Day 1
  23. Treatment with systemic corticosteroids or other systemic immunosuppressive medications (including but not limited to prednisone, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, thalidomide, and anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents) within 2 weeks prior to Cycle 1, Day 1, or anticipated requirement for systemic immunosuppressive medications during the trial
  24. History of autoimmune disease, including but not limited to myasthenia gravis, myositis, autoimmune hepatitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, vascular thrombosis associated with anti-phospholipid syndrome, Wegener's granulomatosis, Sjögren's syndrome, Guillain-Barré syndrome, multiple sclerosis, vasculitis, or glomerulonephritis
  25. History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (including pneumonitis), drug-induced pneumonitis, organizing pneumonia (i.e., bronchiolitis obliterans, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia), or evidence of active pneumonitis
  26. Immunocompromised patients, e.g., patients who are known to be serologically positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  27. Signs or symptoms of infection within 2 weeks prior to Cycle 1, Day 1
  28. Active tuberculosis
  29. Administration of a live, attenuated vaccine (including against influenza) within 4 weeks prior to Cycle 1, Day 1 or anticipation that it will be administered at any time during the treatment period of the study or within 5 months after the final dose of atezolizumab.
  30. History of severe allergic, anaphylactic, or other hypersensitivity reactions to chimeric or humanized antibodies or fusion proteins
  31. Known hypersensitivity or allergy to biopharmaceuticals produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells or to any component of the atezolizumab formulation or allergy to any of the other drugs included in the protocol or their solvents (including to Cremophor®)
  32. Patient has received prior treatment with a poly (adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor in the recurrent setting or has participated in a study where any treatment arm included administration of a PARP inhibitor in the recurrent setting, unless the patient is unblinded and there is evidence of not having received a PARP inhibitor. Patients that received PARP inhibitor as front line are eligible for the study. The duration of exposure to PARPi following front line therapy needs to be ≥18 months for BRCA mutated patients and ≥ 12 months for BRCA wild type patients.
  33. Patient has had any known ≥Grade 3 hematological toxicity anemia, neutropenia or thrombocytopenia due to prior cancer chemotherapy that persisted >4 weeks and was related to the most recent treatment
  34. Patient has any known history or current diagnosis of Myelodysplasic syndrome (MDS) or Anaplastic Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
  35. Previous allogeneic bone marrow transplant or previous solid organ transplantation
  36. Patient has a condition (such as transfusion dependent anemia or thrombocytopenia), therapy, or laboratory abnormality that might confound the study results or interfere with the patient's participation for the full duration of the study treatment
  37. Participant has any known hypersensitivity to niraparib components or excipients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Arm A (Control Arm)

Placebo of atezolizumab in combination with one of the platinum based regimens below (investigator's choice) followed by maintenance niraparib with placebo:

  • Carboplatin (AUC = 5, d1) plus paclitaxel and placebo every 3 weeks. Non-progressing patients will be switched to maintenance niraparib in combination with placebo every 3 weeks
  • Carboplatin (AUC = 4, d1) plus gemcitabine and placebo every 3 weeks. Non-progressing patients will be switched to maintenance niraparib in combination with placebo every 3 weeks.
  • Carboplatin (AUC = 5, d1) plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and placebo every 4 weeks. Non-progressing patients will be switched to maintenance niraparib in combination with placebo every 3 weeks.
Volume equivalent to 1200 mg of atezolizumab drug product. Intravenous Day 1
Other Names:
  • Placebo of Atezolizumab
Intravenous. Day 1
175 mg/m². Intravenous. Day 1
200 mg or 300 mg. Oral. From day 1 to 21
1000 mg/m². Intravenous. Day 1 and day 8.
30 mg/m². Intravenous. Day 1
Experimental: Arm B (experimental arm)

Atezolizumab in combination with one of the platinum based regimens below (investigator's choice) followed by maintenance niraparib with atezolizumab:

  • Carboplatin (AUC = 5, d1) plus paclitaxel and atezolizumab every 3 weeks. Non-progressing patients will be switched to maintenance niraparib in combination with atezolizumab every 3 weeks.
  • Carboplatin (AUC = 4, d1) plus gemcitabine and atezolizumab every 3 weeks. Non-progressing patients will be switched to maintenance niraparib in combination with atezolizumab every 3 weeks.
  • Carboplatin (AUC = 5, d1) plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and atezolizumab every 4 weeks. Non-progressing patients will be switched to maintenance niraparib in combination with atezolizumab every 3 weeks.
Intravenous. Day 1
175 mg/m². Intravenous. Day 1
200 mg or 300 mg. Oral. From day 1 to 21
1000 mg/m². Intravenous. Day 1 and day 8.
30 mg/m². Intravenous. Day 1
1200 mg. Intravenous. Day 1
Other Names:
  • Tecentriq

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 30 months
Period from study entry (day of randomization) until disease progression, death or date of last contact. Progression will be based on tumor assessment made by the investigators according to the RECIST v1.1 criteria.
30 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 60 months
The observed length of life from entry into the study (day of randomization) to death due to any cause, or the date of last contact if patient alive.
60 months
Time to first subsequent therapy or death (TFST)
Time Frame: 60 months
Time from the date of randomization in the current study to the start date of the first subsequent anticancer therapy.
60 months
Time to second subsequent therapy or death (TSST)
Time Frame: 60 months
Time from the date of randomization in the current study to the start date of the second subsequent anticancer therapy
60 months
Time to second progression or death (PFS2)
Time Frame: 60 months
Time from treatment randomization to the earliest date of assessment of progression on the next anticancer therapy following study treatment or death by any cause.
60 months
Incidence of Treatment Adverse Events
Time Frame: 60 months
Frequency and severity of adverse events as assessed by CTCAE version 5.0 for the regimens administered on this study
60 months
Patient-reported abdominal symptoms
Time Frame: 60 months
Clinically-meaningful improvement in patient-reported abdominal pain or bloating, defined as a 10-point decrease from the baseline score on either of the two items of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire-ovarian cancer module (QLQ-OV28) abdominal/GI symptom scale (items 31 and 32)
60 months
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of function and health related quality of life (HRQoL)
Time Frame: 60 months
Clinical improvement, remaining stable, or deterioration in patient-reported function and HRQoL, defined as a 10-point increase, changes within 10 points, and a 10-point decrease, respectively, from the baseline score on each of the functional (physical, role, emotional, and social) and global health status/HRQoL scales of EORTC QLQ-C30
60 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: 60 months
Based on investigator assessment by RECIST v1.1 during the chemotherapy phase and during the maintenance phase
60 months
Duration of response (DOR)
Time Frame: 60 months
Based on investigator assessment by RECIST v1.1 during the chemotherapy phase and during the maintenance phase
60 months
Progression-free survival (PFS) from the beginning of the maintenance phase in all patients, in patients in complete or partial response after completing chemotherapy and in patients with stable disease after completing chemotherapy
Time Frame: 60 months
Period from start of maintenance treatment until disease progression, death or date of last contact assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 criteria, in all patients receiving maintenance treatment as well as in the subgroup of patients with complete response/partial response (CR/PR) of stable disease (SD) after completing chemotherapy
60 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) and BRCA status.
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship of PFS with BRCA mutational status
60 months
Overall Survival (OS) and BRCA status.
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship of OS with BRCA mutational status
60 months
Time to first subsequent therapy or death (TFST) and BRCA status.
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship of TFST with BRCA mutational status
60 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) and BRCA status.
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship of ORR with BRCA mutational status
60 months
Duration of Response (DOR) and BRCA status.
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship of DOR with BRCA mutational status
60 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) and PD-L1 status
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship of PFS with PD-L1 expression status
60 months
Overall Survival (OS) and PD-L1 status
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship of OS with PD-L1 expression status
60 months
Time to first subsequent therapy or death (TFST) and PD-L1 status
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship of TFST with PD-L1 expression status
60 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) and PD-L1 status
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship of ORR with PD-L1 expression status
60 months
Duration of Response (DOR) and PD-L1 status
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship of DOR with PD-L1 expression status
60 months
Efficacy of atezolizumab compared to placebo in the PD-L1 negative and PD-L1 positive subgroups
Time Frame: 60 months
To evaluate the immune response to atezolizumab
60 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate PROs of disease associated with atezolizumab versus placebo
Time Frame: 60 months
Mean and mean changes from the baseline score in disease by cycle and between treatment arms as assessed by scale of european organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
60 months
Evaluate PROs of disease associated with atezolizumab versus placebo
Time Frame: 60 months
Mean and mean changes from the baseline score in disease by cycle and between treatment arms as assessed by scale quality of life questionnaire ovarian 28 (QLQ-OV28)
60 months
Evaluate treatment-related symptoms associated with atezolizumab versus placebo
Time Frame: 60 months
Mean and mean changes from the baseline score in treatment-related symptoms by cycle and between treatment arms as assessed by all symptom item scale of EORTC QLQ-C30.
60 months
Evaluate treatment-related symptoms associated with atezolizumab versus placebo
Time Frame: 60 months
Mean and mean changes from the baseline score in treatment-related symptoms by cycle and between treatment arms as assessed by all symptom item scale of EORTC QLQ-OV28
60 months
Treatment burden
Time Frame: 60 months
Any treatment burden patients may experience in association with atezolizumab versus placebo, as measured by a single item (from GP5: "I am bothered by side effects of treatment") from the physical wellbeing subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Quality of Life instrument
60 months
Patients' health utility
Time Frame: 60 months
Evaluate and compare between treatment arms patients' health utility as measured by European Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) to generate utility scores for use in economic models for reimbursement
60 months
Patients' health utility
Time Frame: 60 months
Evaluate and compare between treatment arms patients' health utility as measured by EuroQoL 5 Dimension to generate utility scores for use in economic models for reimbursement
60 months
Patients' health utility
Time Frame: 60 months
Evaluate and compare between treatment arms patients' health utility as measured by 5 Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) to generate utility scores for use in economic models for reimbursement
60 months
Association of PD-L1 expression and other immune biomarkers with clinical outcomes
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship between tumour immune-related or disease type-related biomarkers (including but not limited to mutational burden, PD-L1, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and cluster of differentiation (CD)8) in tumour tissues or blood samples, and clinical outcomes
60 months
Biomarkers predictive of the response to atezolizumab.
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship between exploratory biomarkers (circulating cell-free DNA) assessed from plasma before and during/after treatment, and clinical outcomes
60 months
Biomarkers predictive of the response to atezolizumab.
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship between exploratory biomarkers (proteins) assessed from plasma before and during/after treatment, and clinical outcomes
60 months
Biomarkers predictive of the response to atezolizumab.
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship between exploratory biomarkers (cytokines) assessed from plasma before and during/after treatment, and clinical outcomes
60 months
Effect of antibiotic (ATB) use on the efficacy of atezolizumab.
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship between ATB use within 2 month before and 1 month after the first study administration with atezolizumab efficacy as measured by PFS.
60 months
To evaluate the efficacy of atezolizumab vs placebo according to previous use of PARP inhibitors in front line.
Time Frame: 60 months
Relationship between previous use of PARP inhibitors in front line and clinical outcomes.
60 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe