Food for Thought: Food Insecurity Screening in the Emergency Department

March 14, 2023 updated by: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Food for Thought: A Randomized Trial of Food Insecurity Screening in the Emergency Department

This study compares food insecurity disclosure rates in face-to-face interviews versus electronic formats, and explores caregiver preferences regarding screening modality and location, in a large, urban pediatric emergency department. Half of the participants were screened for food insecurity verbally, face-to-face by a research assistant, and half of the participants were screened electronically by a tablet.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Children are disproportionately affected by the rise in poverty rates in the United States, and economic hardships can compromise their development, negatively affect their overall health, and adversely affect their abilities to succeed in school and in life. Food insecurity (FI)-the limited or uncertain availability of nutritionally adequate or safe foods- while strongly associated with poverty, is an independent predictor of poor health outcomes for children.

The Emergency Department (ED) of academic medical centers often serves as a point of care entry for impoverished and high-risk families. Although there is a growing interest in the healthcare system's ability to address Social Determinants of Health (SDH), little is known about food insecurity in the pediatric ED. Additionally, there are limited data on how to implement FI screening into practice in a way that maximizes elicitation of social need, while assuring patient and family comfort.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1818

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking
  • Adult caregiver accompanying pediatric patient in the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) emergency department

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient (child) in critical condition
  • Patient (child) >18 years of age
  • Previously enrolled in study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tablet Screening
Food insecurity screening conducted via electronic tablet
The intervention is the type of screening modality used to identify food insecurity: verbal face-to-face, or tablet-based screening
Active Comparator: Verbal Screening
Food insecurity screening conducted via verbal face-to-face interview
The intervention is the type of screening modality used to identify food insecurity: verbal face-to-face, or tablet-based screening

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of Food Insecurity
Time Frame: 12 months
Affirmative response to either of the two, validated screening questions for food insecurity. Investigators measured food insecurity using the validated two-question "Hunger Vital Sign" screening tool, with yes/no responses. These two questions are: within the past 12 months "we worried whether our food would run out before we got money to buy more" and "the food we bought just didn't last and we didn't have money to get more."
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preferred Screening Modality
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Report of screening modality preference: verbal, tablet, or no preference
4 weeks
Comfort level with screening location
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Report of comfort with screening in the emergency department and in the primary care setting
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 28, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

January 18, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Child Nutrition Disorders

Clinical Trials on Food Insecurity Screening Tablet

Subscribe