- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03771131
A Group Study on the Effects of a Short Multi-Domain Cognitive Training in Healthy Elderly Italian People
December 7, 2018 updated by: Roberta Daini, University of Milano Bicocca
Alongside physiological cognitive ageing, nowadays there is an alarming increase in the incidence of dementia that requires communities to invest in its prevention.
The engagement in cognitively stimulating activities and strong social networks have been identified among those protective factors promoting successful cognitive ageing.
One aspect regarding cognitive stimulation concerns the relevance of the frequency of an external intervention.
For these reasons, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a 3-month multi-domain cognitive training program, administered once per week in a group of healthy elderly aged over 60 years old.
Their results obtained on a series of neuropsychological tests, both pre- (t0) and post-training (t1), were compared with those of a passive control group who did not receive the cognitive training.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Participants were assigned to the experimental or control group based on their time of application to the program.
Both experimental and control group underwent a neuropsychological assessment to investigate different cognitive domains, before and after (~3 months) the training program.
Based on the scores obtained during the preliminary neuropsychological assessment, the participants of the experimental training group were divided into small subgroups (ranging from 8 to 12 subjects) to further address individualization of training (i.e. level of difficulty of the exercises proposed).
The experimental group attended weekly sessions of the multi-domain cognitive training.
Each session lasted around one hour and the overall duration of the training was of 3 months, for a total of 13 sessions.
To promote improvement transfer to everyday life, some of the exercises proposed were ecological in their nature, in that, they asked participants to solve tasks that recalled everyday situations (such as remembering names or road maps).
Furthermore, throughout the training, approximately once every two sessions brief psycho-educational interventions were provided.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
108
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Milan, Italy, 20126
- University of Milan-Bicocca
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
60 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age over 60 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Negative anamnesis for neurological and/or psychiatric diseases
- No suspected cognitive impairment as assessed during the pre-training neuropsychological testing (>2 pathological scores)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Experimental group
Group receiving the multi-domain cognitive training
|
Weekly sessions of multi-domain cognitive training, each lasting around one hour for an overall duration of the training of 3 months (13 sessions)
|
No Intervention: Control group
Passive control group
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean change from pre-training in Montreal Congnitive Assessment (MoCA) scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Raw score, assessing global cognitive functioning.
Cutoff: < 17.362.
Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
|
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Mean change from pre-training in Forward and Backward Digit and Corsi Span scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Raw score, assessing verbal and visuo-spatial short term memory.
Cutoff: < 4.26 (Forward Digit Span), < 2.65 (Backward Digit Span), < 3.46 (Forward Corsi Span), < 3.08 (Backward Corsi Span).
Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
|
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Mean change from pre-training in Short Story test scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Raw score, assessing verbal long term memory.
Cutoff: < 7.5.
Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
|
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Mean change from pre-training in Copy and Recall of Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Raw score, assessing constructional abilities and visuo-spatial long term memory.
Cutoff: < 28.87 (Copy), < 9.46 (Recall).
Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
|
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Mean change from pre-training in Semantic and Phonological Verbal Fluency scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Raw score, assessing executive functions.
Cutoff: < 16 (Phonological), < 24 (Semantic).
Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
|
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Mean change from pre-training in Stroop color and word test scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Raw score, assessing inhibitory control.
Cutoff: > 36.92 (for Time measure), > 4.24 (for Error measure).
Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
|
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Mean change from pre-training in Trail Making test scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Raw score, assessing attention.
Cutoff: > 93 (TMT A), > 282 (TMT B), > 186 (TMT B-A).
Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
|
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Mean change from pre-training in Raven's coloured matrices scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Raw score, assessing non-verbal reasoning.
Cutoff: < 18. Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
|
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Mean scores in the Post-training questionnaire
Time Frame: Post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Scores assessing both the satisfaction level about the training and the possible impact of the program on participants' everyday activities, mood and socialization.
Each question was measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1: most negative score; 5: most positive score).
|
Post-training (after ~3 months of training)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 7, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
December 10, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 10, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 7, 2018
Last Verified
December 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- DD
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Age-related Cognitive Decline
-
National Yang Ming UniversityNational Science and Technology CouncilCompletedAge-related Cognitive Decline | Age-related Physiology DeclineTaiwan
-
National University of SingaporeRecruitingAging | Age Problem | Age-related Cognitive Decline | Age-Related AtrophySingapore
-
Posit Science CorporationUniversity of Iowa; The University of Texas at DallasRecruitingAge-related Cognitive DeclineUnited States
-
Columbia UniversityCompletedAge-related Cognitive DeclineUnited States
-
American Academy of Regenerative MedicineUnknownAge-related Cognitive Decline
-
Perception Dynamics InstituteUniversity of California, San Diego; University of South AlabamaWithdrawnAge Related Cognitive DeclineUnited States
-
Posit Science CorporationHarvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM); University of IowaCompletedAge-related Cognitive DeclineUnited States
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedAge-Related Cognitive DeclineKorea, Republic of
-
Arizona State UniversityCompleted
-
School of Health Sciences GenevaGerman Research Foundation; Swiss National Science FoundationCompletedAge-related Cognitive DeclineSwitzerland
Clinical Trials on Multi-domain cognitive training
-
Stanford UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedMild Cognitive ImpairmentUnited States
-
Beijing Anzhen HospitalBeijing Wispirit Technology Co., LtdNot yet recruitingHypertension | Mild Cognitive ImpairmentChina
-
Beijing Anzhen HospitalBeijing Wispirit Technology Co., LtdActive, not recruitingCoronary Heart Disease | Mild Cognitive ImpairmentChina
-
Kazimierz Wielki UniversityNational Science Centre, Poland; John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin...CompletedAging | Cognitive Decline | Old Age; DementiaPoland
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingWuhan University; Beijing Friendship Hospital; First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAmnestic Mild Cognitive ImpairmentChina
-
National Yang Ming UniversityCompleted
-
Ministry of Science and Technology, TaiwanCompletedMild Cognitive Impairment
-
Geriatric Education and Research InstituteNeeuro Pte Ltd; Ministry of Health, Singapore; ProAge Pte Ltd; KKT Technology Pte...CompletedCognitive Decline | Cognitive Impairment, MildSingapore
-
National Yang Ming UniversityNational Science and Technology CouncilCompletedAge-related Cognitive Decline | Age-related Physiology DeclineTaiwan
-
NeurocoreCompletedMild Cognitive ImpairmentUnited States