A Group Study on the Effects of a Short Multi-Domain Cognitive Training in Healthy Elderly Italian People

December 7, 2018 updated by: Roberta Daini, University of Milano Bicocca
Alongside physiological cognitive ageing, nowadays there is an alarming increase in the incidence of dementia that requires communities to invest in its prevention. The engagement in cognitively stimulating activities and strong social networks have been identified among those protective factors promoting successful cognitive ageing. One aspect regarding cognitive stimulation concerns the relevance of the frequency of an external intervention. For these reasons, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a 3-month multi-domain cognitive training program, administered once per week in a group of healthy elderly aged over 60 years old. Their results obtained on a series of neuropsychological tests, both pre- (t0) and post-training (t1), were compared with those of a passive control group who did not receive the cognitive training.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Participants were assigned to the experimental or control group based on their time of application to the program. Both experimental and control group underwent a neuropsychological assessment to investigate different cognitive domains, before and after (~3 months) the training program. Based on the scores obtained during the preliminary neuropsychological assessment, the participants of the experimental training group were divided into small subgroups (ranging from 8 to 12 subjects) to further address individualization of training (i.e. level of difficulty of the exercises proposed). The experimental group attended weekly sessions of the multi-domain cognitive training. Each session lasted around one hour and the overall duration of the training was of 3 months, for a total of 13 sessions. To promote improvement transfer to everyday life, some of the exercises proposed were ecological in their nature, in that, they asked participants to solve tasks that recalled everyday situations (such as remembering names or road maps). Furthermore, throughout the training, approximately once every two sessions brief psycho-educational interventions were provided.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

108

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy, 20126
        • University of Milan-Bicocca

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 60 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Negative anamnesis for neurological and/or psychiatric diseases
  • No suspected cognitive impairment as assessed during the pre-training neuropsychological testing (>2 pathological scores)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
Group receiving the multi-domain cognitive training
Weekly sessions of multi-domain cognitive training, each lasting around one hour for an overall duration of the training of 3 months (13 sessions)
No Intervention: Control group
Passive control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change from pre-training in Montreal Congnitive Assessment (MoCA) scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Raw score, assessing global cognitive functioning. Cutoff: < 17.362. Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Mean change from pre-training in Forward and Backward Digit and Corsi Span scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Raw score, assessing verbal and visuo-spatial short term memory. Cutoff: < 4.26 (Forward Digit Span), < 2.65 (Backward Digit Span), < 3.46 (Forward Corsi Span), < 3.08 (Backward Corsi Span). Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Mean change from pre-training in Short Story test scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Raw score, assessing verbal long term memory. Cutoff: < 7.5. Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Mean change from pre-training in Copy and Recall of Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Raw score, assessing constructional abilities and visuo-spatial long term memory. Cutoff: < 28.87 (Copy), < 9.46 (Recall). Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Mean change from pre-training in Semantic and Phonological Verbal Fluency scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Raw score, assessing executive functions. Cutoff: < 16 (Phonological), < 24 (Semantic). Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Mean change from pre-training in Stroop color and word test scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Raw score, assessing inhibitory control. Cutoff: > 36.92 (for Time measure), > 4.24 (for Error measure). Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Mean change from pre-training in Trail Making test scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Raw score, assessing attention. Cutoff: > 93 (TMT A), > 282 (TMT B), > 186 (TMT B-A). Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Mean change from pre-training in Raven's coloured matrices scores
Time Frame: Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Raw score, assessing non-verbal reasoning. Cutoff: < 18. Cutoff scores indicate the value above/below which the cognitive performance is considered pathological.
Pre- and post-training (after ~3 months of training)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean scores in the Post-training questionnaire
Time Frame: Post-training (after ~3 months of training)
Scores assessing both the satisfaction level about the training and the possible impact of the program on participants' everyday activities, mood and socialization. Each question was measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1: most negative score; 5: most positive score).
Post-training (after ~3 months of training)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Age-related Cognitive Decline

Clinical Trials on Multi-domain cognitive training

3
Subscribe