- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03794466
Quantify the Degree of Pain Relief of Pelvic Congestion Syndrome Following Gonadal Vein Embolization
March 18, 2026 updated by: University of Kansas Medical Center
Quantification of Pain Relief With Gonadal Vein Embolization for Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
The primary objective is to quantify the degree of pain relief in patients undergoing gonadal vein embolization with coils as well as identify clinical or imaging factors that are predictive of a positive response to treatment, or poor response to treatment.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
Chronic pelvic pain affects almost 40% of women during their lifetime.
Pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS) accounts for up to 30% of those with chronic pelvic pain.
The most common underlying cause of PCS is incompetence or obstruction of the gonadal veins, resulting in painful congestion of the pelvic and perineal venous vasculature.
Medical treatment is first line, and aims to suppress ovarian function and induce vasoconstriction of the venous system.
Unfortunately, efficacy and long-term pain relief from medical therapy is limited.
Coil embolization of the gonadal veins has been shown to decrease pain in those affected by PCS, although the degree of relief has not yet been quantified.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
30
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Carissa Walter, MPH
- Phone Number: 9139457450
- Email: cwalter2@kumc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
- Recruiting
- The University of Kansas Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Carissa Walter, MPH
- Phone Number: 913-945-7450
- Email: cwalter2@kumc.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Adam S Alli, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Daniel Kirkpatrick, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Steven Lemons, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Brandon Custer, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Philip Johnson, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Zachary Collins, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Women, 18 years of age and older, who are candidates for gonadal vein embolization in the Interventional Radiology division at the University of Kansas Medical Center from October 1, 2018 to October 1, 2019.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female patients 18 years of age or older
- Meet the clinical and imaging criteria for the diagnosis of PCS and have no contraindications to coil embolization of the gonadal veins.
- Patients who are treated with coil embolization of the gonadal veins in the Interventional Radiology division between October 1, 2018 to October 1, 2019.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients less than 18 years of age.
- Patients who are found to have an underlying cause of pelvic congestion syndrome unrelated to venous congestion and insufficiency. This includes, but is not limited to, nutcracker syndrome, or a mass resulting in extrinsic compression of the gonadal veins.
- Patients who have received prior surgical therapy for PCS, including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH-BSO), gonadal vein resection, or gonadal vein ligation.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quantify pain relief using the Pelvic Congestion Symptom Pain Scale after gonadal vein embolization
Time Frame: Change from baseline (before gonadal vein embolization) to 360 days post-procedure.
|
quantify the degree of pain relief in patients undergoing gonadal vein embolization with coils using a survey consisting 4 questions.
Answers will be given values 0-4, which higher values are considered to be worse outcomes.
One question is "On average, how many days a week do you experience pelvic pain?" Answers would be none (0), 1-2 days a week (1), 3-4 days a week (2), 5-6 days a week (3), and every day of the week (4).
Maximum total amount of points will be 16.
This is the number of points added together from all 4 questions.
|
Change from baseline (before gonadal vein embolization) to 360 days post-procedure.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Predict positive or poor response to gonadal vein embolization treatment
Time Frame: Change from baseline (before gonadal vein embolization) to 360 days post-procedure.
|
Identify clinical or imaging factors that are predictive of a positive response to treatment, or poor response to treatment.
|
Change from baseline (before gonadal vein embolization) to 360 days post-procedure.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Adam S Alli, MD, University of Kansas Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Ignacio EA, Dua R, Sarin S, Harper AS, Yim D, Mathur V, Venbrux AC. Pelvic congestion syndrome: diagnosis and treatment. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2008 Dec;25(4):361-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1102998.
- O'Brien MT, Gillespie DL. Diagnosis and treatment of the pelvic congestion syndrome. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2015 Jan;3(1):96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
- Koo S, Fan CM. Pelvic congestion syndrome and pelvic varicosities. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Jun;17(2):90-5. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2014.02.005.
- Lopez AJ. Female Pelvic Vein Embolization: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Aug;38(4):806-20. doi: 10.1007/s00270-015-1074-7. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
- Daniels JP, Champaneria R, Shah L, Gupta JK, Birch J, Moss JG. Effectiveness of Embolization or Sclerotherapy of Pelvic Veins for Reducing Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016 Oct;27(10):1478-1486.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.04.016. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
- Brown CL, Rizer M, Alexander R, Sharpe EE 3rd, Rochon PJ. Pelvic Congestion Syndrome: Systematic Review of Treatment Success. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2018 Mar;35(1):35-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1636519. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
- Guirola JA, Sanchez-Ballestin M, Sierre S, Lahuerta C, Mayoral V, De Gregorio MA. A Randomized Trial of Endovascular Embolization Treatment in Pelvic Congestion Syndrome: Fibered Platinum Coils versus Vascular Plugs with 1-Year Clinical Outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Jan;29(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 10, 2019
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 3, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
January 7, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 23, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 18, 2026
Last Verified
March 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00143045
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pelvic Pain
-
Foundation University IslamabadActive, not recruitingPregnancy Related Pelvic Girdle PainPakistan
-
Haute Ecole de Santé VaudLa Tour HospitalNot yet recruitingPregnancy | Pelvic Girdle Pain | Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions
-
University of California, San FranciscoStanford University; National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health...CompletedPelvic Pain | Chronic Pelvic Pain | Recurrent Pelvic PainUnited States
-
SoLa Pelvic TherapyUroshape LLCRecruitingChronic Pelvic Pain | Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (CPPS)United States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityPenumbra Inc.; Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation; VIVA PhysiciansRecruitingPelvic Pain | Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome | Pelvic Pain Syndrome | Pelvic Congestive Syndrome | Pelvic VaricesUnited States
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)CompletedPregnancy | Genito-Pelvic Pain | Pelvic Floor Muscle ExerciseTurkey
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalRecruitingPregnancy | Pregnancy-related Low Back and Pelvic PainChina
-
Aijun SunSecond Hospital of Jilin University; Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical... and other collaboratorsUnknownChronic Pelvic PainChina
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedIntractable Pelvic Cancer PainEgypt
-
Beijing Konruns Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.CompletedChronic Pelvic PainChina