Postural Stability in Cervical Spinal Myelopathy

November 26, 2025 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Study of Postural Stability in Subjects With Myelopathy Using a Portable Virtual Reality Balance Protocol

Veterans are at heightened risk of developing cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) from rigors of military service. Balance and posturography are negatively affected in CSM, but require expensive equipment, and extensive training of personnel for data acquisition and interpretation. The Virtual Environment TBI Screen (VETS) is a simple and inexpensive construct that could be implemented as an aid in diagnosis and as an objective means to compare treatment modalities and track recovery. The goal for the SPiRE is to generate the critical data to support rigorous Merit studies of posturography for assessments of clinical course in the treatment and rehabilitation of CSM. The investigators' ultimate goal, if the SPiRE is successful, is to phase in objective posturography assessments as VA standard of care in CSM.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

COVID-19 administrative hold

Veterans are at heightened risk of developing cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) from rigors of military service. Diagnosis of CSM involves a set of clinical findings and is confirmed by imaging the spine.

Gait impairment and disturbances of stance control are hallmarks of CSM and are a consequence of abnormalities in proprioception due to dorsal column tract damage of the spine. Currently, gait and balance deficits rely on clinical level assessments and judgement for detection. An objective measure of posturography has the benefit of: a) quantifying balance-related disability in CSM, b) facilitating structure-functional assessments in CSM, and c) quantifying the degree surgical interventions affect posturography and recovery of function in CSM.

Objective and sensitive means for assessing balance and posturography exist, but are not routinely incorporated in diagnosis or functional tracking of progress after interventions such as surgery. A barrier may be accessibility of posturography and ease of assessments. The Virtual Environment TBI Screen (VETS) was devised using Army Rapid Innovation Development funding to objectively assess balance and posturography in a cost effective, but sensitive manner. VETS involves virtual environments and computerized posturography and is proving to be a sensitive system facilitating diagnosis, treatment, and mitigation of balance dysfunction associated with mTBI.

The working hypothesis is VETS testing will enhance clinical judgements regarding CSM. The SPiRE is designed to provide data critical to a more extensive program of research incorporating posturography into treatment and rehabilitation of CSM.

First, a limited comparative study of standing balance will be conducted of 20 Veterans being evaluated for cervical spine surgery to treat CSM and 20 otherwise healthy Veterans. Second, posturography of the Veterans undergoing surgery to treat CSM will be tracked during their scheduled follow up visits to determine the degree VETS scores are affected by surgery and to track recovery from CSM.

Patients in the CSM group will be selected based on clinical criteria. Veterans in the control group will be recruited from the Syracuse Veterans Affairs Medical Center (SVAMC) and surrounding community.

For VETS testing, the Veteran will stand directly on a firm surface or foam pad placed on top of a Wii Balance Board (WBB). There are six conditions manipulating surface (firm or foam surface) and visual input (eyes open viewing a static scene, eyes closed, and eyes open viewing a dynamic visual scene). The primary measure is the center of pressure (COP) sway area. These 6 conditions allow for an assessment of generalized vs specific deficits in COP sway area considering proprioception, dependence of visual input and visuo-proprioceptive integration.

AIM 1A: Determine whether and to what degree balance is altered in CSM. The degree of COP sway will be compared between CSM and controls in the six conditions comprising VETS testing.

AIM 1B: Determine whether VETS enhances sensitivity and selectivity in the diagnosis of CSM. Composite measures of balance will be related to clinical assessment tools and their relationship with MRI.

AIM 2: Evaluate the VETS scores after surgery to treat CSM. The degree of COP sway area under the 6 conditions will be compared before surgery, 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery (corresponding with post-operative clinical assessments).

The ultimate goal is to validate and incorporate objective balance testing into routine assessment for CSM to aid in disambiguating CSM, to improve functional assessments of recovery, and to aid in evaluations of different treatment and rehabilitation strategies in CSM for the Veteran population.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Syracuse, New York, United States, 13210
        • Syracuse VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

US Veterans.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients in the CSM group will be selected based on clinical criteria. Inclusion criteria for the CSM group are:

  • symptoms of myelopathy in upper and lower extremities and stenosis of the cervical spine demonstrated by MRI or myelography
  • lower extremity muscle strength of 4 as quantified by manual muscle test (MMT) 36 or above
  • ability to stand without support with eyes closed for 30 s or more
  • Veterans in the control group will be recruited from the SVAMC and surrounding community using printed advertisements

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria for all study participants are:

  • presence of lower extremity or lumbar spine disease
  • peripheral neuropathy
  • history of other neurological disorder
  • inability to stand in an upright position with both feet together and eyes closed
  • Although the SVAMC population is predominately Caucasian and male, every effort will be made to recruit minorities and women
  • The proposed study will neither target for recruitment nor will the investigators exclude pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM)
Degenerative cervical myelopathy, encapsulates a cascade of events leading to significant degenerative changes in discs, formation of osteophytes, facet hypertrophy, calcification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and ligamentous flavum with resultant canal stenosis and segmental instability.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Virtual Environment TBI System (VETS) Assessment of Static Posturography
Time Frame: Pre-Surgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans
The postural stability task involves six conditions during which Veterans are instructed to look straight ahead and maintain an upright stance as stably as possible. Veterans are barefooted with feet comfortably placed ~25 cm apart. The six conditions are (1) Eyes Open (EO) Firm (2) Eyes Closed (EC) Firm, (3) Dynamic Scene (DYN) Firm, (4) EO Foam, (5) EC Foam, and (6) DYN Foam. a) Comparison of CSM vs. Control and within-subject visual (EO,EC, and DYN) and surface conditions (FIRM and FOAM). b) Comparison of balance and posture at Pre-surgery for CSM group to age and gender matched non-CSM controls. Only pre-surgery data in CSM group was collected due to COVID-19.
Pre-Surgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans
Change in Static Posturography (VETS)
Time Frame: Pre-surgery compared to 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months post-surgery VETS factors. The Post-surgery endpoints are normally scheduled clinical follow ups.
The Pre-surgery CSM group recruited for VETS (Static Posturography) measurement will also serve as the sample for the change in VETS measurement as a change in centimeters (cm). This is a longitudinal assessment of balance following surgical intervention for CSM.
Pre-surgery compared to 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months post-surgery VETS factors. The Post-surgery endpoints are normally scheduled clinical follow ups.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nurick Scale
Time Frame: PreSurgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans

The Nurick scale is a 6-grade ordinal scale assessing gait impairment, with grades ranging from 0 (signs and symptoms of root involvement but no evidence of spinal cord disease) to 5 (chair bound or bedridden). The aggregate value of the Nurick scale will be related to posturography. Classification Scheme:

  • Grade 0: signs or symptoms of root involvement but without evidence of spinal cord disease
  • Grade 1: signs of spinal cord disease but no difficulty in walking.
  • Grade 2: slight difficulty in walking which does not prevent full-time employment
  • Grade 3: difficulty in walking which prevented full time employment or the ability to do all housework, but which was not so severe as to require someone else's help to walk
  • Grade 4: able to walk only with someone else's help or with the aid of a frame.
  • Grade 5 : chairbound or bedridden.
PreSurgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: PreSurgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans
NDI is related to VETS posturography to determine sensitivity of standing posture to degree of disability. The NDI is a 10-item questionnaire addressing function activities (personal care, lifting, reading, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation), pain intensity, concentration, and headache. For each item, patients make their ratings on a 6-point Likert scale with values 0 = no disability and 5 = complete disability. Summed scores for each category are multiplied by 2 to give a total NDI score ranging from 0-100. Score: /50 Transform to percentage score x 100 = %points. Scoring: Example:16 (total scored)50 (total possible score) x 100 = 32% If one section is missed or not applicable the score is calculated: 16 (total scored)45 (total possible score) x 100 = 35.5% Minimum Detectable Change (90% confidence): 5 points or 10 %points
PreSurgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans
Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2)
Time Frame: PreSurgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans
The SF-36 questionnaire consists of eight scales yielding two summary measures: physical and mental health. The physical health measure includes four scales of physical functioning (10 items), role-physical (4 items), bodily pain (2 items), and general health (5 items). The mental health measure is composed of vitality (4 items), social functioning (2 items), role-emotional (3 items), and mental health (5 items). The SF-36 offers a choice of recall format at a standard (4 week) or acute (1 week) time frame. Likert scales and yes/no options are used to assess function and well-being on this 36-item questionnaire. To score the SF-36, scales are standardized with a scoring algorithm or by the SF-36v2 scoring software to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health status, and a mean score of 50 has been articulated as a normative value for all scales.
PreSurgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans
EC FIRM/EO FIRM Ratio
Time Frame: PreSurgery
From the VETS, a ratio corresponding to the Rhomberg ratio of COP sway will be used to determine the degree static posture depends on visual input. The Romberg test used in posturography compares postural sway in eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) conditions. The Romberg ratio was calculated in the traditional manner, i.e. EC/EO. The ensuing Romberg ratio (EC/EO) is used to assess visual dependency in postural stability. Higher Romberg ratios reflect greater instability with closed eyes, ( a greater amount of postural sway during eyes closed) whereas a ratio < 1 indicates higher stability in the EC versus EO condition.
PreSurgery
EO FOAM/EO FIRM
Time Frame: PreSurgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans
From the VETS, a ratio of COP sway will be used to determine the degree static posture is affected by reduced proprioception.
PreSurgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans
EC FOAM/EO FOAM Ratio
Time Frame: PreSurgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans
From the VETS, a ratio of COP sway will be used to determine the degree of loss of visual information. Loss of visual information compounds reduced proprioceptive ability in static balance.
PreSurgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans
DYN FOAM/DYN FIRM Ratio
Time Frame: PostSurgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans compared to otherwise healthy Veterans
From the VETS, a ratio of COP sway will be used to determine how roll vection is induced by loss of proprioception.
PostSurgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans compared to otherwise healthy Veterans
DYN FIRM/ EO FIRM Ratio
Time Frame: PreSurgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans
From the VETS, a ration of COP sway to determine the degree roll vection is induced.
PreSurgery compared to otherwise healthy Veterans

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard J. Servatius, PhD, Syracuse VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • F2882-P
  • RX002882-01A1 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Department of Veterans Affairs)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Subscribe